Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22585
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Message-ID | <13124040.1SXmGGuGdH@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:51:12 +0100 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.11.3 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Face | %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v |
| Face | 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 |
| Subject | Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <larc8g$s3c$1@dont-email.me> <hdq2d9p4tjse2t0isfv010f2m9f0fn7gdl@4ax.com> <52d1792f$0$6555$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1590346.McO4MUtrrQ@PointedEars.de> <52d2f7f4$0$9522$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 21 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 12 Jan 2014 21:51:15 CET |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 537bacab.newsspool4.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=Ulfi997U`UgJ00P1S40fZg4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOkEUNnbbFTL3bDZm8W4\YJNlYUVHKH;GI^goE><`M@=jfm1d9hLG[6e6o |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:22585 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Christoph Michael Becker wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> The methods of Employee instances here are “privileged“ and the variables >> are “private” (terms coined by Douglas Crockford, IIRC), because only >> those methods can access those variables/pseudo-properties. It is the >> closest equivalent to private/protected properties in class-based OOP. > > AIUI, this technique has a memory overhead, however, as references to > the functions would have to be stored once per object instance (opposed > to functions referenced from properties of the prototype object). Yes, it is a tradeoff. Someone had suggested privileged *prototype* methods instead, but that only helps if all instances should share the variable values. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2014-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-11 16:37 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-01-11 15:58 +0000
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-01-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-11 20:07 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-01-12 21:15 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-12 21:51 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-01-14 09:56 +0000
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2014-01-11 23:10 +0700
csiph-web