Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56513

Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours

Show all headers | View raw

In article <120220141708372000%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner
<michelle@michelle.org> wrote:

> > > > > I wrote "the article", you were going by what JF wrote, and that I
> > > > > quoted; you didn't bother reading the article.
> > > > 
> > > > nope. i was going by what *you* wrote.
> > > > 
> > > > *you* said you wondered how accurate it could be based on the photo
> > > > they included. those are *your* words, which you conveniently snipped.
> > > 
> > > I wrote "the article", and you said that you didn't see anything in
> > > what I quoted about service.  If you're going to continue to lie,
> > > please don't make it so easy to point out the lie; it's like shooting
> > > fish in a barrel.
> > 
> > here's what you wrote, where you question the validity of bloomberg's
> > report based on a photo, exactly as i said you did.
> > 
> > In article <120220141239031491%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner
> > <michelle@michelle.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article <52fbc90f$0$61421$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com>, JF
> > > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Bloomberg has once again started a rumour of Apple unveiling a new Apple
> > > > TV device. Announcement expected in April, available for Christmas
> > > > shopping season.
> > > 
> > > Considering that the photo is of the first generation AppleTV which was
> > > discontinued in September 2010, I wonder how accurate the article is.
> > 
> > 
> > you *later* brought up the service. you said *nothing* about the
> > service in the original post.
> 
> One last thing, and then I'm really done.  If you had bothered to read
> the article, you would have known what I was referring to, but you were
> so eager to jump in and argue that you didn't bother to do that.  You
> can try to weasel your way around that all you want, but you can't
> change the facts.

i was responding solely to what you wrote, in that you discounted an
article, regardless of what it said or didn't say, because of the
choice of a photo.

you are trying to turn it into something it isn't, as usual, and it's
*you* who is weaseling.

but you'll never admit it.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 14:18 -0500
  Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 12:39 -0700
    Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 15:03 -0500
      Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 13:42 -0700
        Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 16:24 -0500
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 15:32 -0600
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-12 21:51 +0000
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:22 -0700
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 17:31 -0500
            Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:47 -0700
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> - 2014-02-13 04:39 +0000
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-14 12:08 -0800
        Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 16:40 -0500
          Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:28 -0700
            Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 17:48 -0500
              Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 16:00 -0700
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 18:29 -0500
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 16:49 -0700
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 17:08 -0700
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 23:18 -0500
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Happynet Steering Society <b@o.ru> - 2014-02-13 17:04 -0500
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
                Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
            Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-02-12 22:48 -0800
            Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-13 17:09 -0500
    Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 17:20 -0500
      Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:46 -0700
    Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-13 15:27 +0000

csiph-web