Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #56466
| From | Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours |
| Date | 2014-02-12 17:08 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <120220141708372000%michelle@michelle.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <120220141748222890%nospam@nospam.invalid> <120220141600095481%michelle@michelle.org> <120220141829582649%nospam@nospam.invalid> <120220141649222670%michelle@michelle.org> <120220141856489225%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
In article <120220141856489225%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <120220141649222670%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner > <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > I wrote "the article", you were going by what JF wrote, and that I > > > > quoted; you didn't bother reading the article. > > > > > > nope. i was going by what *you* wrote. > > > > > > *you* said you wondered how accurate it could be based on the photo > > > they included. those are *your* words, which you conveniently snipped. > > > > I wrote "the article", and you said that you didn't see anything in > > what I quoted about service. If you're going to continue to lie, > > please don't make it so easy to point out the lie; it's like shooting > > fish in a barrel. > > here's what you wrote, where you question the validity of bloomberg's > report based on a photo, exactly as i said you did. > > In article <120220141239031491%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner > <michelle@michelle.org> wrote: > > > In article <52fbc90f$0$61421$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com>, JF > > Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > > > > Bloomberg has once again started a rumour of Apple unveiling a new Apple > > > TV device. Announcement expected in April, available for Christmas > > > shopping season. > > > > Considering that the photo is of the first generation AppleTV which was > > discontinued in September 2010, I wonder how accurate the article is. > > > you *later* brought up the service. you said *nothing* about the > service in the original post. One last thing, and then I'm really done. If you had bothered to read the article, you would have known what I was referring to, but you were so eager to jump in and argue that you didn't bother to do that. You can try to weasel your way around that all you want, but you can't change the facts.
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 14:18 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 12:39 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 15:03 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 13:42 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 16:24 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Ted Lee <tmplee@gmail.com> - 2014-02-12 15:32 -0600
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-12 21:51 +0000
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:22 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 17:31 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> - 2014-02-13 04:39 +0000
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-14 12:08 -0800
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 16:40 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:28 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 17:48 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 16:00 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 18:29 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 16:49 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-12 18:56 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 17:08 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2014-02-12 23:18 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Happynet Steering Society <b@o.ru> - 2014-02-13 17:04 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 17:38 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2014-02-12 22:48 -0800
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-13 17:09 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 17:20 -0500
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 15:46 -0700
Re: OT: New Apple TV rumours Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-13 15:27 +0000
csiph-web