Re: Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use)

From	Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups	comp.arch
Subject	Re: Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use)
Date	2026-10-31 19:10 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<11c5efn$1cdb3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <ygnwlr084yt.fsf@y.z> <1793320218-5857@newsgrouper.org> <ygnjymy5uo2.fsf@y.z> <11c4dcm$102m6$1@dont-email.me> <1793471234-5857@newsgrouper.org>

Show all headers | View raw

MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> schrieb:
> Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> posted:
>
>> Josh Vanderhoof <x@y.z> schrieb:
>> 
>> > Say instead it's for something called featurex and some processors 
>> > want it in hardware and some don't.  It'd be much easier for 
>> > someone writing the software if a standard sequence of 
>> > instructions for doing featurex was defined and new processors 
>> > that do featurex in hardware automatically checked call targets 
>> > and recognize when the instruction sequence matches featurex. 
>> > Then when the routine is called later uses the dedicated 
>> > instruction instead doing the call.
>> 
>> You could have instructions that either do things in hardware or
>> jump to a subroutine at a defined address from a jump table
>> index by opcode.  That would solve the problem, I think, and
>
> That would add LDD-latency plus JUMP-latency to instruction-latency--
> even if the index was extracted by HW. Probably around 5-6 cycles.

Sounds reasonable.  Much faster than trap+emulate, fixup at runtime
would probably need lots of NOPs, and branching to different
versions multiplies code size by the number of versions you have.

It would simply be just another compromise, I guess.

>  
>> > It's be really nice because the code would be identical for 
>> > everything and also run about as fast as possible on everything. 
>> > I have no idea how hard it would be to keep the track of which 
>> > subroutines are actually new instructions though.
>> 
>> this would be OK.
>> 
>> Has anybody actually done this?
>
> How do you think microCode works ??

What I was thinking of was to expose this in the ISA, so people
could use multiplication etc without having to switch on CPU
type, which is a pain.  Call it poor man's millicode.

-- 
This USENET posting was made without artificial intelligence,
artificial impertinence, artificial arrogance, artificial stupidity,
artificial flavorings or artificial colorants.

Thread

interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-01 17:00 -0300
  Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-09-01 20:51 +0000
    Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-09-02 12:28 +0000
    Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) makendo <makendo@makendo.invalid> - 2026-10-27 14:17 +0800
      Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-10-27 16:14 +0000
        Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-10-27 17:06 +0000
          Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-10-27 19:17 +0200
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-10-27 20:59 +0000
            128/64 division (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-10-28 08:34 +0000
              Re: 128/64 division (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-28 11:10 +0000
          Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2026-10-27 19:20 +0100
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-27 18:49 +0000
            Re: floating point, interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-10-27 20:08 +0000
              Re: floating point, interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) "Brian G. Lucas" <bagel99@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 17:44 -0400
              Re: floating point, interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-10-28 12:10 +0000
                Re: floating point, interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-10-28 16:46 +0000
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-10-28 12:17 +0000
              Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-10-28 12:41 +0000
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-10-28 19:06 +0000
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 16:39 -0500
          Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-27 18:46 +0000
          Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2026-10-28 12:33 +0000
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-28 15:20 +0000
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-10-28 15:47 +0000
              Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Josh Vanderhoof <x@y.z> - 2026-10-29 19:25 -0400
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-10-30 00:30 +0000
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-10-30 14:01 -0500
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Josh Vanderhoof <x@y.z> - 2026-10-31 01:02 -0400
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2026-10-31 08:44 +0100
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2026-10-31 15:15 +0000
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Terje Mathisen <terje.mathisen@tmsw.no> - 2026-11-01 09:02 +0100
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Paul Clayton <paaronclayton@gmail.com> - 2026-11-04 23:53 -0500
                Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2026-10-31 09:45 +0000
                Re: Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-10-31 18:27 +0000
                Re: Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2026-10-31 19:10 +0000
                Re: Unimplemented opcodes via jump tables (was: interrupt handling latency and weird register use) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-11-01 16:11 +0000
                Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) - 2026-10-30 11:50 +0000
            Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-10-28 15:52 -0500
          Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-10-29 16:57 +0000
        Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-27 18:45 +0000
        Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> - 2026-10-27 13:56 -0500
  Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) MitchAlsup <user5857@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-09-02 01:43 +0000
  interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Andy Valencia <vandys@vsta.org> - 2026-09-02 08:11 -0700
    Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-03 02:59 +0000
      Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-03 14:41 +0000
  Re: interrupt handling latency and weird register use (was Re: OT: Epic RISC-V rant) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-09-03 02:56 +0000

csiph-web