Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #748251
| From | Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design, sci.energy.atomic |
| Subject | Re: Random noise generation |
| Date | 2026-09-26 18:00 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1199182$mq4l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <11964eo$3n5ba$1@dont-email.me> <1196aej$3po1j$1@dont-email.me> <nnd$2e047d73$13149011@51f0966eff7a7349> <1198258$beb2$1@dont-email.me> <4cqfblpp96pbh7vtnvoilardlu2e75ccqm@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
>john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote: >>On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:09:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >wrote: > >>Build you own nuclear reactor? >>Is probably illegal. >>Fusion power will never work anyway!!! > >There are two or three very-well-funded fusion energy startups now, >that plan to use bar lasers to compress hydrogen pellets to fusion at >maybe 10 Hz. Inertia, a spinoff of NIF, is one. > >NIF has achieved over unity light-to-energy fusion, but they use >flashtubes which are very inefficient at pumping their lasers. So >their wall-plug efficiency is awful, and their shot rate is maybe >1/day. You can NEVER get more energy out of a spring than you put in compressing it! No matter what divide by zero mamaticians and einstone say. It is a job creation program for their parrots Ever new company startups looking for yet an other clueless investor. Governments pouring money in it too (ITER) A chain reaction is like a spring hold together by some small clamp hit it end it will remove the clamp and it will jump, every now and then a clamp fails all by itself... now put enough of those clamped springs together and hit it or wait a little till the first clamp fails, that triggers a chain of expanding springs involving all . What they call 'fusion' is trying to compress the springs again not even clamping those.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
proposal Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-20 14:27 -0600
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-20 13:49 -0700
Re: proposal Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2026-09-20 23:20 +0200
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-20 14:35 -0700
Re: proposal Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2026-09-21 20:11 +0200
Re: proposal Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-09-20 22:46 +0100
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-20 14:56 -0700
Re: proposal Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-20 17:08 -0600
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-20 19:11 -0700
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-20 19:24 -0700
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-20 19:36 -0700
Re: proposal Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-09-21 03:27 +0000
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-20 21:01 -0700
Re: proposal Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-21 06:36 +0000
Re: proposal Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2026-09-21 07:02 +0000
Re: proposal Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-21 07:34 +0000
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-21 01:26 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-21 17:06 +1000
Re: proposal Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-09-20 14:57 -0700
Re: proposal sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-21 03:10 +0200
Re: proposal Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-20 20:38 -0600
Re: proposal Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-21 06:45 +0000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-21 09:26 -0700
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-22 00:36 +0800
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-09-21 10:20 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-22 16:30 +1000
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-22 14:45 +0800
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-22 17:17 +1000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 04:01 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 00:21 +1000
Re: proposal sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-22 02:32 +0200
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-21 19:03 -0700
Re: proposal sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-22 04:09 +0200
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-21 20:23 -0700
Re: proposal sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-22 06:10 +0200
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-22 16:57 +1000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 04:15 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 00:38 +1000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 08:08 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 01:49 +1000
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-23 00:04 +0800
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-24 18:27 +1000
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-24 17:07 +0800
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-25 01:41 +1000
Re: proposal Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-24 10:02 -0600
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-25 04:00 +0800
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-25 16:37 +1000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 04:04 -0700
Re: proposal sobriquet <dohduhdah@yahoo.com> - 2026-09-22 16:38 +0200
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 08:22 -0700
Re: proposal Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-23 00:08 +0800
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 09:36 -0700
Random noise generation (was: Re: proposal) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-23 00:50 +0800
Re: Random noise generation (was: Re: proposal) john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-09-22 10:20 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 03:51 +1000
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-23 01:55 +0800
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-09-22 17:35 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-09-23 15:14 +0000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-24 17:39 +0800
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-25 02:05 +1000
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-25 01:39 +0800
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-24 18:26 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-25 16:46 +1000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-25 07:51 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-26 06:49 +0800
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 07:25 -0700
Re: Random noise generation ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net> - 2026-09-26 12:57 -0400
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-27 06:29 +0800
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 16:17 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:25 +0000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-27 03:10 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-26 15:48 +1000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 08:34 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-27 15:45 +1000
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-26 15:48 +1000
Re: Random noise generation liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-25 09:22 +0100
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-25 07:56 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-09-25 15:36 +0000
Re: Random noise generation John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-09-25 16:59 +0100
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 08:42 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-25 17:19 +0000
Re: Random noise generation Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:08 +0800
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:08 +0000
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:09 +0000
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-26 21:22 +1000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 08:57 -0700
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 11:37 -0700
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-27 08:25 +0000
Re: Random noise generation Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-27 20:47 +1000
Re: Random noise generation Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@htigct.com> - 2026-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Random noise generation liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-25 22:12 +0100
Re: Random noise generation Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-09-26 10:14 +0200
Re: Random noise generation liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-26 14:37 +0100
Re: Random noise generation Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-09-26 23:09 +0200
Re: Random noise generation liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-27 09:15 +0100
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-26 09:01 -0700
Re: Random noise generation liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-09-26 19:45 +0100
Re: Random noise generation Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2026-10-03 13:34 +0200
Re: Random noise generation Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-10-03 16:03 +0200
Re: Random noise generation john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-10-03 08:42 -0700
Re: Random noise generation brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2026-10-06 05:39 +0100
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 01:01 +1000
Re: proposal someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-09-21 21:00 +0000
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-22 17:10 +1000
Re: proposal john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-09-22 04:21 -0700
Re: proposal Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-09-23 02:17 +1000
csiph-web