Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #672459

From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings] (Was: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

The word Musings has a totally new meaning:

Torbjörn Lager wrote:
 > When
 >
 > call(Goal), Self ! Pid-Goal
 >
 > succeeds, that top-level goal has completed
 > and the actor terminates successfully.

Ok, I see. I thought it will be automatically
redone, and thus rapid fire multiple solutions.
So you have already hardwired a once/1 semantic
into your spawn/3, in that the spawn/3 goal argument

when executed, is onced, only looking at its EXIT
and FAIL port, not calling once more its REDO port.
This also means that both parallel/1 and
first_solution/1 have a short-cut AND

respective OR semantic:

/* AND-parallelism with short-cut */
parallel([G1,..,Gn])   <=>   once(G1), .., once(G2)

/* OR-parallelism with short-cut */
first_solution([G1,..,Gn])   <=>   once(G1); ..; once(G2)

The short-cut is in that parallel/1 can stop
at the first failure, and that first_solution/1
can stop at the first success. I wonder whether
Web Prolog Trinity offers true AND-parallelism or

true OR-parallelism without a short-cut. Having
such constructs could be interesting for problem
solving and is often used parallel search. For
example SICStus Prolog offers, or offered, true

OR-parallelism in its Multi-sequential Prolog
engines (Muse) extension, from the SICS experiments
in the 1990s with the BNN Butterfly supercomputer
from the 1980s:

yes
| ?- muse_flag(num_workers,_,5).
| ?- run.
724 solutions in 2.760 seconds.

yes
| ?- muse_flag(num_workers,_,1).
| ?- run.
724 solutions in 10.400 seconds.

https://sicstus.sics.se/sicstus/docs/3.7.1/html/sicstus_6.html

The intervention for true OR-paralleism is usually
at rule choice points. So when you have a set
of rules, like for example in the case of
the select/3 predicate:

select([X|Xs], Xs, X).
select([Y|Ys], [Y|Zs], X) :- select(Ys, Zs, X).

You execute it as:

select(X, Y, Z) :-
     muse([select1(X,Y,Z), select2(X,Y,Z)]).

select1([X|Xs], Xs, X).
select2([Y|Ys], [Y|Zs], X) :- select(Ys, Zs, X).

Where the muse meta predicate has true OR parallelism:

muse([G1,..,Gn])    <=>    G1 | .. | Gn

Bye

See also:

The muse approach to Or-parallel prolog
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01407834

BBN Butterfly
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBN_Butterfly

P.S.: Maybe this explains my Freundlian slip when
I expected your parallel/1 to be some OR-parallelism,
while it is some AND-parallism. The true OR-parallelism

can be mathematically formalized in logic via
non-determinism and π-calculus:

π-calculus
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/pi-calculus

You even don’t need actor mailboxes, only channel objects.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> We recently implemented a parallel π-WAM
> on a GPU backend and could demonstrate an
> estimated 11.4 Giga Lips. In this post we
> report a further experiment, this time
> presenting a parallel π-WAM on a CPU backend,
> that can lift specialized Prolog, currently
> to 1.7 Giga Lips performance.
> 
> Having an excess number of threads is a
> bad idea. What if we do context switching
> on our own? With this approach we could
> bring down the execution time of 128 Hack
> VMs by 33%. We estimate for the test which
> had 11.4 GLips on the GPU, that we reach
> 1.7 GLips on the CPU.
> 
> Bye
> 
> See also:
> 
> Parallel π-WAM: 1.7 Giga Lips on a CPU
> https://medium.com/2989/8a984e75af44
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> TSMC's 2nm (N2) node and the 7 GHz target
>> represent a monumental milestone in silicon
>> manufacturing, shifting away from legacy
>> FinFETs to advanced Gate-All-Around (GAA)
>> nanosheet transistors.
>>
>> This evolution allows chip designers—particularly
>> in the PC and AI sectors—to push processor
>> clock speeds previously thought impossible
>> on standard nodes
>>
>> AMD confirms Zen 6 rollout for its July 22 AI event
>> https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-confirms-zen-6-launches-in-less-than-two-weeks-starting-with-epyc-venice 
>>
>>
>> Production of the 6th Gen EPYC family is
>> already ramping up. AMD says Venice is its
>> first high-performance computing product
>> manufactured using TSMC’s 2nm process
>> technology.
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For marketing purposes people
>>> typically look at the race towards
>>> 2nm, and we find:
>>>
>>> A month ago, Apple lost its exclusivity
>>> on 3 nm smartphone processors with
>>> MediaTek’s Dimensity 9400 chip, integrated
>>> in the Vivo X200 Pro smartphone. Qualcomm
>>> is also in the race with its recently
>>> unveiled Snapdragon 8 Elite and set to
>>> power the Xiaomi 15 Pro in 2025. However,
>>> Apple should regain its position as innovation
>>> leader in 2026 with the release of the
>>> iPhone 18, which should feature the A20
>>> chip built on TSMC’s 2 nm process."
>>>
>>> But there is a vertical vias revolution
>>> going on as well, some SOCs typically
>>> being at 18 layers now:
>>>
>>> Zooming Into a CPU (It's Incredible)
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bez-2cvYja0
>>>
>>> imec has coined the term CMOS 2.0:
>>>
>>> LEUVEN (Belgium), MARCH 12th, 2026 — Imec,
>>> a world-leading research and innovation hub
>>> in advanced semiconductor technologies, has
>>> launched a first-of-its-kind consortium with
>>> 26 European university groups that will jointly
>>> work on the technology roadmap beyond
>>> CMOS scaling (CMOS 2.0).
>>> https://www.imec-int.com/en/press/imec-launches-university-consortium-around-next-generation-chips 
>>>
>>>
>>> So we might see more mobile grade GPUs.
>>>
>>> Bye
>>
> 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

TSMC's 2nm (N2) node and the 7 GHz target (Was: Creating a "European CMOS 2.0 Army") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-14 14:11 +0200
  Re: TSMC's 2nm (N2) node and the 7 GHz target (Was: Creating a "European CMOS 2.0 Army") Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-07-14 08:49 -0700
  Re: TSMC's 2nm (N2) node and the 7 GHz target (Was: Creating a "European CMOS 2.0 Army") Keyler Babaskin <nb@erbbiia.ru> - 2026-07-14 16:55 +0000
  pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars (Re: TSMC's 2nm (N2) node and the 7 GHz target) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-15 18:11 +0200
    So memory bandwidth is no issue at all (Re: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-15 18:35 +0200
      Re: So memory bandwidth is no issue at all (Re: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars) Dominique Belorussov <os@ssdoi.ru> - 2026-07-16 13:44 +0000
        For iGPU which acts as a APU RAM is shared (Was: So memory bandwidth is no issue at all) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-16 17:07 +0200
          Re: For iGPU which acts as a APU RAM is shared (Was: So memory bandwidth is no issue at all) Bobauk Modenov <bo@modoadb.ru> - 2026-07-16 17:45 +0000
            Village Idiot wants 8088 back [Puting Troll] (Was: For iGPU which acts as a APU RAM is shared) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-16 23:02 +0200
              VT100 25 x 80 terminal = 2000 Bytes (Was: Village Idiot wants 8088 back [Puting Troll]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-16 23:08 +0200
    From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings] (Was: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-27 17:56 +0200
      Re: From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings] (Was: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars) Serafin Zavrajnov <naj@varrjn.ru> - 2026-08-27 20:57 +0000
      Re: From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings] (Was: pi-WAM is just like Laika3, the first Dog on Mars) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-29 03:09 +0200
      I think Erlang is completely dead. And I repeat it. (Re: From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-08-29 03:10 +0200
        Re: I think Erlang is completely dead. And I repeat it. (Re: From short-cut parallelism to true parallelism [π-WAM Musings]) Bonny Tubinov <oioo@yubby.ru> - 2026-08-30 10:34 +0000

csiph-web