Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90561
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) |
| Date | 2026-08-25 20:14 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <116kpi1$6rh$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <116inh2$3q9bn$1@news.xmission.com> <116iufv$3ca8b$1@dont-email.me> <116jfjj$3ri64$1@news.xmission.com> <116ki56$3tfgm$1@dont-email.me> |
On 25/08/2026 18:07, Rich wrote: > Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote: >> In article <116iufv$3ca8b$1@dont-email.me>, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >>> Now, if the destination machine is Linux/Unix, and it has rsync >>> installed (this is usual unless you go out of your way to "trim" down >>> the installation) the only requirement is to setup ssh access... >> >> As it happens, in the instant case, the target machine was (is) >> running a stripped down version of Linux and rsync is not installed >> there (nor can it be). But there is (just) enough there for sshfs to >> work. > > Well, in that case you appear to have no choice but to use sshfs as the > "network transport" for the file data. > I decided on rsyncd -- There’s a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good. Burton Hillis (William Vaughn, American columnist)
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 00:27 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 02:26 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 07:18 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0200
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:33 +0100
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:07 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:14 +0100
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 03:03 -0400
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:53 +0200
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:29 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 03:40 -0400
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 22:43 -0400
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-26 09:46 +0200
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-25 10:20 +0200
csiph-web