Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90509

Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?)

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?)
Date 2026-08-25 11:53 +0200
Organization Tebibyte_Retro_Gaming
Message-ID <v850mmx2r7.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <116inh2$3q9bn$1@news.xmission.com> <4R-dndVP7cUyoxD3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2026-08-25 09:03, c186282 wrote:
> On 8/24/26 20:27, Kenny McCormack wrote:
>> I've recently done a large file copy between two Linux-ish machines, 
>> using
>> rsync.  It all went well, so no worries, but it made me wonder about
>> some things.
> 
> 
>    'Rsync' is REALLY good - and a param or two for EVERY
>    need. Used it - evoked from many pgms - for nearly 20
>    years for backups.
> 
>    Only note, DO be careful with the "delete" option, because
>    if a mount fails (and they CAN) it can do damage. PROBE
>    for existing mounts BEFORE using rsync with 'delete'.
> 
>    Wrote a big nice Pascal backup pgm that called rsynch
>    using 'delete'. After working well for a long time it
>    did serious damage, had to re-load EVERYTHING from an
>    older archive. Took like 24 hours.
> 
>    As said, the REAL problem was that the source mount
>    got DROPPED somewhere along the way. 'Delete' relies
>    on the source mount to work as designed.


I concur. I deleted the wrong tree once. The source, by mistake.

...
-- 
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 00:27 +0000
  Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 02:26 +0000
    Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 07:18 +0000
      Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0200
        Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:33 +0100
      Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:07 +0000
        Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 18:02 +0000
        Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:14 +0100
      Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:34 +0000
  Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 03:03 -0400
    Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:53 +0200
      Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:29 +0000
  Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-25 10:20 +0200

csiph-web