Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90509
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) |
| Date | 2026-08-25 11:53 +0200 |
| Organization | Tebibyte_Retro_Gaming |
| Message-ID | <v850mmx2r7.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink) |
| References | <116inh2$3q9bn$1@news.xmission.com> <4R-dndVP7cUyoxD3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 2026-08-25 09:03, c186282 wrote: > On 8/24/26 20:27, Kenny McCormack wrote: >> I've recently done a large file copy between two Linux-ish machines, >> using >> rsync. It all went well, so no worries, but it made me wonder about >> some things. > > > 'Rsync' is REALLY good - and a param or two for EVERY > need. Used it - evoked from many pgms - for nearly 20 > years for backups. > > Only note, DO be careful with the "delete" option, because > if a mount fails (and they CAN) it can do damage. PROBE > for existing mounts BEFORE using rsync with 'delete'. > > Wrote a big nice Pascal backup pgm that called rsynch > using 'delete'. After working well for a long time it > did serious damage, had to re-load EVERYTHING from an > older archive. Took like 24 hours. > > As said, the REAL problem was that the source mount > got DROPPED somewhere along the way. 'Delete' relies > on the source mount to work as designed. I concur. I deleted the wrong tree once. The source, by mistake. ... -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 00:27 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 02:26 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 07:18 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0200
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 12:33 +0100
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:07 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-08-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 20:14 +0100
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:34 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 03:03 -0400
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:53 +0200
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-25 17:29 +0000
Re: Question about rsync operational modes - which is best? (Or are they all the same?) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-25 10:20 +0200
csiph-web