Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #21698

Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images

From Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images
Date 2026-08-06 18:35 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <1153279$7cbp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <1150ctu$qfgj$1@paganini.bofh.team> <1150daf$3ck8b$1@dont-email.me> <1151lsr$3nuph$1@dont-email.me> <1151tu9$3qmob$1@dont-email.me> <1152qa8$4na3$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 8/6/2026 4:20 PM, knuttle wrote:
> On 08/06/2026 8:16 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
>> 54 megapixels, really? I knew 'phone cameras were getting ridiculous,
>> but even so ... 🙂>
> 
> I was always amused by this.  I have friends who do not have a computer and only view their pictures on the cellphone screen.  Then they make sure you are aware on their phone with the best camera available.....to provide picture for the 3" screen on their cellphones.

Well, think of the digital zoom you can do.
Maybe not.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Cameras/comments/1fkl654/how_phone_cameras_pack_100mp_in_such_ridiculously/

   Paul

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 13:07 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-05 14:28 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2026-08-05 13:00 -0700
    Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 17:57 -0400
      Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2026-08-05 17:27 -0700
        Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 21:55 -0400
          Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-06 05:00 +0200
          Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 04:59 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-06 13:58 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2026-08-05 13:23 -0700
    Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Jack <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-05 23:15 +0100
      Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2026-08-05 18:26 -0400
        Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 05:58 -0400
          Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-06 07:11 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 14:46 -0400
          Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-08-06 13:16 +0100
            Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-06 16:20 -0400
              Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 18:35 -0400
                Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-08-07 02:36 +0100
  Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-05 22:34 +0200

csiph-web