Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #21674
| From | "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images |
| Date | 2026-08-05 18:26 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1150daf$3ck8b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <114vqkp$362gb$1@dont-email.me> <115063v$3a7ef$1@dont-email.me> <1150ctu$qfgj$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
On 8/5/26 6:15 PM, Jack wrote:
> On 05/08/2026 21:23, David E. Ross wrote:
>> I upload large files (including images) to the test folder on my Web
>> site. I then send a brief message with a link to a recipient along with
>> a request to let me know when the recipient has downloaded it. I then
>> delete it from my Web site.
>
>
> I agree. There's no point sending large files by email. Not only do they
> use up internet bandwidth, they also increase the size of the inboxes of
> both the sender and the recipient. While these files can be deleted,
> it's better to avoid the hassle of deleting them and losing track of
> what was sent and when by doing things properly in the first place.
>
>
And how many people track stuff like that and then years later why google or yahoo are
telling them their storage allotment has been hit.
--
Mint 22.3, Thunderbird 153.0esr, Firefox 153.0.1
Alan K.
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 13:07 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-05 14:28 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2026-08-05 13:00 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 17:57 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2026-08-05 17:27 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-05 21:55 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-06 05:00 +0200
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 04:59 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-06 13:58 +0200
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2026-08-05 13:23 -0700
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Jack <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-05 23:15 +0100
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2026-08-05 18:26 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 05:58 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-06 07:11 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 14:46 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-08-06 13:16 +0100
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-06 16:20 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-08-06 18:35 -0400
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-08-07 02:36 +0100
Re: Thunderbird 153.0.2 (64-bit) and large images dillinger <dillinger@not.invalid> - 2026-08-05 22:34 +0200
csiph-web