Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > news.admin.peering > #3438
| From | Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | news.admin.peering |
| Subject | Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense |
| Date | 2026-08-01 18:19 -0700 |
| Organization | csiph.com Internet News Service |
| Message-ID | <114m5uk$1nvp$1@csiph.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <6a6dd0b0$1@news.ausics.net> <114kmi5$sud$1@csiph.com> <6a6dfa86$1@news.ausics.net> <114lv9t$1k3v$1@csiph.com> <114m48k$3lksb$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
On 8/1/26 17:50, Eddie Martin wrote: > On 2/08/2026 9:25 am, Kevin Bowling wrote: >> On 8/1/26 06:54, noel wrote: >>> On Sat, 01 Aug 2026 04:50:28 -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Many larger providers use multiple A records for good reasons, it's >>> >>> yeah, they're too cheap to use what the big boys use hardware load >>> balancers >>> >>>> valid to design around articles flooding into networks and you really >>>> shouldn't put a load balancer in front of feeders.. just use the >>> >>> /me shakes head >>> >>>> protocols effectively. Inferring that there must be a relationship to >>>> IPs or that an operator is forever bound to one set of systems/PoPs >>>> doesn't reflect how these systems are run. You need to have proper >>>> rDNS >>> >>> thats contrary to my experience in the real world of running ISP's and >>> carriers for over 30 years, crap thats over 35 years now actiually >>> >>>> set up and the 3 major news server software handle this per design. >>> >>> >>> whoooooooooooppppieeeeeeeeeeeeeeee who cares, are you trying to tell >>> me i >>> should adjust the way i do things, the same way national carriers have >>> been doing this for over 30 years just because you say so, just to >>> resolve one persons M.O.O? you're a bigger fucking idiot than I was >>> starting to think if so. >> >> I was guiding you nicely to the fact that you have no idea what you >> are talking about. I've helped build two of the largest CDNs in the >> world, and you do it by using the Internet Protocols as designed never >> hardware load balancers which cannot scale and are additional failure >> domain. >> > > > Good grief, I can't remain silent in this who's got the bigger dick > contest any longer, how you do things today is nothing like how it was > done before, having worked at high levels in ATT for decades (thankfully > I am recently retired so I no longer need to deal with rubbish like > this), hardware load balancers have long and are still very common > today, or were 7 months ago anyway. So what if you have helped build > (I've never heard your name before a couple months ago when you started > contributing to INN2)a CDN, a CDN is a CDN, it solves a mostly > different problem, or perhaps your CDN was at Alphabet or Facebook, it > would explain your arrogances. The Internet Protocols are the same, only the L7 differs. Inbound NNTP is basically the worst possible place to use a load balancer, you just have the feeders peer with each other and outward and everything flood fills without any additional complexity. Reader servers might benefit from a sticky session LB, and a _proxy_ (not LB) would be less ridiculous for inbound if it was providing routing or message oracle for some distributed backend. > >>>>> All in all its just common courtesy to give your peers a heads up, its >>>>> fine if Jesse no longer wants peering, jesus, it took me 3 weeks to >>>>> discover he was MIA courtesy of the pending articles list file hitting >>>>> 10Mb which triggered the email alert, anyways he can either accept the >>>>> advice or ignore it, the sun will still rise in the morning. >>> >>>> Maybe look at the bigger picture of what he is doing and that most of >>>> use are cramming administration into active life. Your server your >>>> rules, so to each their own. >>> >>> ohh wow really, and i thought running my organisation 15 hours a day 6 >>> days a week was because i was bored and wanted to avoid the family.. >>> thats where i went wrong.. jesus fucking christ. Jesse miught lack >>> common >>> courtesy, but you lack common sense, and thats worse. >>> dont waste your time trolling me again. >> >> The mercurial reaction to your own Dunning-Kruger limits is at least >> comical. If you don't want peers, drop them. You're the one making >> the spectacle and an ass out of yourself. > > On the contrary you all are making an ass out of yourselves. Both you > and Noel need time out, Jesse does need to learn if he wants to provide > a service, he needs to consider everyone he provides services to, or > request they use hostnames or thank but decline to peer, yes, stuff > happens, but it takes 30 seconds to post a note in here even after the > fact saying "hey guys" he instead probably spent more energy attacking > Noel then he did in putting in thought to how his consequences affect > other peers (and now prospective other peers who see how they get > treated), and yes Noel should have fired an Email to Jesse instead of > venting here, it had merit, but should have been raised in private. > Although as he alludes, maybe in jest, that he wont be using Jesse's or > anyone's peering shortly either way, a shame to see an apparently long > time service pulled because of usenet admin squabbles, and I find it > strange that Kevin thinks he can speak to this where from what I can > tell, he does not and has never run an NNTP server, let alone service, > so not sure where he thinks he can speak on this matter, only one who > has run them for a substantial amount of time actually understands, > perhaps his misguided beliefs that CDN and usenet are the same. Another hyperbolic joker. I've run a peer for 15 years, not hard to observe. > You all need time out to think and reflect. > > Enjoy your weekend. > > >
Back to news.admin.peering | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-01 09:56 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2026-08-01 03:13 +0000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-08-01 06:18 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Ray Banana <rayban@raybanana.net> - 2026-08-01 08:52 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 01:10 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-01 20:55 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 04:50 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-01 23:54 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2026-08-01 16:25 +0000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2026-08-01 21:02 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-02 09:04 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2026-08-02 12:54 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-04 08:23 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2026-08-04 02:34 +0000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-06 00:12 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2026-08-02 11:45 +0000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 16:25 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Eddie Martin <ejm@nospammy.myplace.de> - 2026-08-02 10:50 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 18:19 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Eddie Martin <ejm@nospammy.myplace.de> - 2026-08-02 13:29 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 21:02 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-08-02 06:41 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> - 2026-08-01 22:11 -0700
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> - 2026-08-02 13:02 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense D <J@M> - 2026-08-02 06:47 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-01 20:08 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Ray Banana <rayban@raybanana.net> - 2026-08-01 16:35 +0200
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-01 20:07 +1000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> - 2026-08-15 01:47 -0500
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Jesse Rehmer <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2026-08-15 13:17 +0000
Re: another peeve with newsmaster who dont do common sense Nigel Reed <sysop@endofthelinebbs.com> - 2026-08-29 22:32 -0500
csiph-web