Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #33372
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.software.firefox |
| Subject | Re: No more Redirect page. |
| Date | 2026-07-27 21:00 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <11489td$3eut6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <64ac6l5nrfodns2ljaigdhv70t2rme55f1@4ax.com> <1145mvf$2kumk$1@dont-email.me> <5e3d6lh35gss83gm652mbajnstp72iq0kv@4ax.com> <114757h$3205f$1@dont-email.me> <2qme6lh35er4sua31b4soj8in4tssrvtru@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Micky, >> Besides, why didn't you just respond to Pauls post, instead of jamming >> your response to him into your reply to me ? > > I think it is much more clear to reply to everyone in the same post, > instead of making people look through scrattered posts to see the whole > picture. The only thing you can hope to gain is to preclude the inevitable branching of the thread by a single post - while creating confusion about whom you are actually talking to. Well done. /s >>> "Guess" is a figure of speech. It was a logical deduction >> >> In your case ? No. You're gu essing like a hunter uses buckshot : >> you don't really need to aim, *something* should hit the target, >> right ? > > I'm sorry you can't follow the logic. Follow *wat* logic ? You have claimed you used it, but somehow never told us about what, according to you, that logic looks like. iow, there is nothing to follow for me/us. > As I said, I had not tried the other two browsers yet. You also said you *did* use them, and from it did draw the conclusion Google must be feeding Firefox different search-result pages. Remember ? >>> Plainly I thought the change was in Google, >> >> Funny that : multiple possibilities, but there you only have a >> single guess. > > It's normal to have a primary guess. I'm sorry you don't think > so. Sorry kiddo, but you can't call a single guess primary. For that you need /at least/ two of them. So, where are the other ones - secondary, tertiary and so on ? Oh, wait, I already gave you a bunch of other guesses ... Including two with a high probability - one of which, how Firefox alerts you to redirects, you actually found some info about and posted a link to. >>> I know that. But something changed. >> >>Possibly. > > What do you mean "possibly"? Before 2 weeks ago there were no > redirect messages and now there are. Something changed. Well, I already told you at least twice that it just might be just your perception that changed. You have not disproven it in any way. You also have not provided proof for anything else. iow, you're /still/ guessing ... >>> I didn't change any settings. >> >>... that you know of. > > I didn't change any settings. > >> You might just have mashed the "yes" button below a question you did >> not comprehend. You might even have forgotten that you changed >> something somewhere (and changed it back) not aware of its side- >> effects. > > None of that happened. How would you know ? Because you can't remember it ? Yeah, thats certainly proof. /s Kiddo, you throw random and far-fetched guesses around like there is no tomorrow, but when I present you with a possibility that has happened quite often you offhandedly reject it. Great going. And no, I'm not saying that that is what actually happened, but its in a helpdesks top-ten of "my 'puter suddenly stopped working, but I didn't do nuthin" causes. >>> I know that. But something changed. >> >>Possibly. > > What do you mean "possibly"? Before 2 weeks ago there were no > redirect messages and now there are. Something changed. You just > want to take issue with everything I say. Why is that? An old saying: "you can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." I already explained the above to you. Its upto you to try to understand. Micky, you know little-to-nothing about your problem, but you already somehow know who must have done it and what it specifically can't be. The only thing you expect from me is to explain to you *how* what you have determined must have happened has actually come to be. Thats not going to happen. Bottom line: by now you should know what the cause of your "problem" is and how to "fix" it. Goodbye. Regards, Rudy Wieser
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-24 11:03 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2026-07-25 15:46 -0500
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-25 20:24 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2026-07-26 01:37 -0500
Re: No more Redirect page. "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-07-26 09:22 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-26 11:46 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-07-26 21:25 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-26 19:26 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-07-27 10:34 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-27 10:43 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-07-27 21:00 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-28 13:33 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2026-07-29 10:53 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. "....winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 20:45 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-29 23:01 -0400
Re: No more Redirect page. "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-28 21:50 +0200
Re: No more Redirect page. micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2026-07-29 22:59 -0400
csiph-web