Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy

comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy

2874 articles, 354 threads (numbers 263 – 3141) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux (9 replies — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-14 23:32 +0000
   → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2026-10-14 16:36 -0700
     → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-10-14 19:47 -0400
   → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> 2026-10-14 19:53 -0400
   → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-10-15 07:20 -0400
     → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> 2026-10-15 14:18 +0200
     → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2026-10-15 07:33 -0700
     → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-15 21:36 +0000
       → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2026-10-15 14:54 -0700
       → Re: Epic is bringing Fortnite to Linux CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> 2026-10-15 20:05 -0400
 
Dutch tax authorities cancel Microsoft 365 cloud rollout – and turn toward open source Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-15 06:57 +0000
 
Re: Microsoft just gave up (Co-Pilot+ PCs, fun video) (3 replies — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-08 22:20 +0000
   → Re: Microsoft just gave up (Co-Pilot+ PCs, fun video) Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-10-08 22:35 +0000
     → Re: Microsoft just gave up (Co-Pilot+ PCs, fun video) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-08 22:58 +0000
   → Re: Microsoft just gave up (Co-Pilot+ PCs, fun video) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> 2026-10-08 20:25 -0400
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-07 23:30 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-07 23:24 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare drops from 15% to 3% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-05 02:25 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-04 23:59 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-03 21:56 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-03 21:53 +0000
 
Re: Linux marketshare peaks at 22% Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-03 09:56 +0000
 
Microsoft Adds Support For Yet Another Linux Feature That Linux Already Had Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-10-02 21:36 +0000
 
Meanwhile, Dimdows Takes Longer Than That To Boot ... Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-09-28 07:41 +0000
 
Killer price on a mini PC (17 replies — unroll) "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-15 21:48 -0400
   → Re: Killer price on a mini PC Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> 2026-09-16 03:17 +0000
     → Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-15 23:35 -0400
       → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 21:29 -0700
         → Re: Killer price on a mini PC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-09-19 09:36 -0400
           → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-19 12:03 -0700
   → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-17 13:59 -0700
     → Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-17 17:06 -0400
       → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-17 18:30 -0700
         → Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-17 21:37 -0400
           → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 00:39 -0700
             → Re: Killer price on a mini PC The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 09:06 +0100
               → Re: Killer price on a mini PC "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-18 04:19 -0400
                 → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 14:28 -0700
                 → Re: Killer price on a mini PC rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-09-18 22:59 +0000
               → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 18:04 -0700
                 → Re: Killer price on a mini PC Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> 2026-09-19 08:21 -0400
               → Re: Killer price on a mini PC T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-09-18 18:25 -0700
 
Have Things Really Changed? (2 replies — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-19 06:59 +0000
   → Re: Have Things Really Changed? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> 2026-08-20 12:28 +0700
   → Re: Have Things Really Changed? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-10 01:56 -0400
 
Microsoft’s latest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more (4 replies — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-31 22:16 +0000
   → Re: Microsoft’slatest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more (was: Microsoft’slatest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more) Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-09-01 00:40 +0000
     → Re: Microsoft’slatest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more (was: Microsoft’slatest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more) Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> 2026-09-01 02:39 +0000
     → Re: Microsoft’slatest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-10 01:49 -0400
   → Re: Microsoft’s latest Windows update breaks cursors, wallpaper, and more "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-09-10 01:47 -0400
 
Is This A Genuine Microsoft Utility? (1 reply — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-25 01:27 +0000
   → Re: Is This A Genuine Microsoft Utility? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> 2026-08-25 14:41 +0700
 
"Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" (32 replies — unroll) "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-07-18 14:31 -0400
   → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2026-07-19 03:08 +0800
   → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-07-18 22:31 +0000
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-07-18 18:39 -0400
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-19 01:08 +0000
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-07-19 06:47 +0000
         → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-07-24 15:11 -0400
           → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-07-25 07:28 +0000
             → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-08-17 08:44 -0400
               → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-17 23:19 +0000
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> 2026-07-19 06:40 -0400
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-07-24 15:09 -0400
         → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-25 02:03 +0000
           → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-08-17 08:55 -0400
             → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-17 23:18 +0000
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-07-18 22:45 -0400
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-19 04:56 +0000
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> 2026-07-19 08:43 +0100
         → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-19 08:13 +0000
         → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-07-19 11:13 -0400
           → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-19 23:39 +0000
             → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-20 00:55 +0000
               → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> 2026-07-20 05:30 +0000
                 → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-20 07:14 +0000
                 → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-20 08:11 +0000
                 → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-20 18:51 +0000
           → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> 2026-07-22 18:01 +0100
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" "Jeff Gaines" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> 2026-07-19 07:40 +0000
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" T <T@invalid.invalid> 2026-07-20 00:59 -0700
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-20 08:13 +0000
   → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> 2026-07-19 13:25 -0400
     → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-07-19 23:34 +0000
       → Re: "Microsoft itself accidentally proves Windows 11 minimum system requirements make no sense" rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-07-20 00:57 +0000
 
Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? (15 replies — unroll) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-16 03:32 +0000
   → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 00:00 -0400
   → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-08-16 04:28 +0000
     → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 00:50 -0400
     → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-16 06:39 +0000
       → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 03:15 -0400
         → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 04:09 -0400
       → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2026-08-16 18:15 -0700
         → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-08-17 02:58 +0000
       → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Nick Charles <none@none.none> 2026-08-17 02:52 +0000
         → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2026-08-17 03:04 +0000
           → Re: Is Apple Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2026-08-16 20:37 -0700
   → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 12:16 +0700
     → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> 2026-08-16 01:34 -0400
   → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> 2026-08-16 06:04 +0000
   → Re: Is Windows Inherently A Hostile Environment For Open Source? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> 2026-08-16 08:02 -0400

~Page 1 of ~18 (articles 3085–3141) Older →


csiph-web