Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #201715

Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6

From	Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups	misc.phone.mobile.iphone, alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject	Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6
Date	2026-07-04 23:45 +1000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<112b2p5$5msk$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <naml6gF46poU1@mid.individual.net> <1125mn1$2jjg4$1@dont-email.me> <nao0g1Fb1jlU1@mid.individual.net> <11284ia$3b8td$2@dont-email.me> <napnt9Five0U1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/07/2026 10:23 pm, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-07-03 12:57, Daniel70 wrote:
>> On 3/07/2026 6:37 am, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> On 2026-07-02 14:48, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> On 2/07/2026 6:18 pm, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>> On IPv4 we use dynamic addresses. Our home address is constantly 
>>>>> changed. On IPv6 you get a fixed address (unless you have a silly 
>>>>> provider that uses dynamic addresses).
>>>>
>>>> Sorry. WHAT?? First you type, Carlos, that IPv4 uses dynamic 
>>>> addressing and then you suggest any IPv6 providers that use dynamic 
>>>> addressing are silly!!
>>>>
>>>> WHAT?? Aren't IPv4 providers using dynamic addressing ALSO silly?? 
>>>> Or can IPv4 providers ONLY provide dynamic addressing??
>>>
>>> Not bothering to answer, you are trolling. Surely you know the answer.
>>>
>> No, Carlos, you give me more credit than I deserve. I am merely just 
>> trying to increase my knowledge.
>>
>> Sorry.
> 
> ISPs use dynamic addressing with IPv4 simply because they don't have 
> enough addresses to give us static addresses. Counting on a number of 
> clients to not be connected at all.
> 
> ISPs using IPv6 have tons of addresses to give each home. They do not 
> need to use dynamic addresses, except to destroy the new functionalities 
> that IPv6 with fixed addresses allow.
> 
Thank you, Carlos.
-- 
Daniel70

Thread

BRAXMAN: IPv6 Anonymous <bounce.me@n2n.oc2mx.net> - 2026-07-01 21:12 +0200
  Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-01 21:36 +0200
    Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-01 19:48 -0400
  Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2026-07-02 00:52 +0000
    Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-07-01 22:14 -0400
      Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Nick Charles <none@none.none> - 2026-07-02 02:31 +0000
      Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-02 10:18 +0200
        Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-02 22:48 +1000
          Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-02 22:37 +0200
            Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-03 20:57 +1000
              Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-03 14:23 +0200
                Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-04 23:45 +1000
        Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-07-02 21:15 +0100
        Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-07-06 14:28 +0300
          Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-06 13:39 +0200
  Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 watching you? IPv4? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-02 18:59 +0800
  Re: BRAXMAN: IPv6 Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-07-02 21:01 +0100

csiph-web