Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #38082
| From | John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Pi PICO W on batteries |
| Date | 2026-06-25 09:21 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <111ioe2$3iarj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <sm0se6c8n2s.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <97F*HqVJA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <na2976Fn4t9U2@mid.individual.net> <111gtqv$348m3$3@dont-email.me> <111i7m9$3g155$1@dont-email.me> |
On 25/06/2026 04:35, wmartin wrote: > On 6/24/26 08:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 24/06/2026 15:51, Peter Heitzer wrote: >>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >>>> Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote: >>>>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On 15/06/2026 19:49, Brian Gregory wrote: >>>>>>> nano timer ?? >>>>>>> What's that then? >>>>>> >>>>>> TPL5100 >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.ti.com/product/TPL5110 >>>>> >>>>> I kinda thought modern microcontrollers have this sort of thing built >>>>> in? Oh, looks like the Pico (no W) draws 2 mA in "deep sleep" and this >>>>> timer draws 35 nA. >>>> >>>> That does sound surprisingly bad for the Pico. Seems that the >>>> RP2040 is >>>> 0.18mA in 'dormant' (ie deep sleep) and 0.38mA in 'sleep', which is >>>> a bit >>>> better. So must be something else on the Pico that's not so good in >>>> sleep >>>> mode. >>> I think (ultra) low power was not a primary design goal for the Pico. >>> >> >> I think that is very true. What attracted me was the amount of flash, >> and ram, the availability of wireless and ADCs and the price. Less >> than a pint of beer in a nightclub. >> Arduinos were 3 times the price >> >> The ZeroW running debian is a damn sight easier to code for, however. >> > Be careful about trusting that ADC, it is somewhat notorious for > inconsistent lower bits...summing and averaging helps, if you have the > inter-sample time to do that. > The errors are very predictable as they are caused by certain very low value capacitors in the switched capacitor adc having incorrect values. It seems that the chip design tools did not model stray or fringing capacitances accurately enough. There is software around that can post process the adc readings to make a substantial improvement. https://github.com/kitanokitsune/rp2040adc_correction John
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-14 12:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 17:48 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 12:31 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 13:04 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 12:06 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:19 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 13:58 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 16:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2026-06-15 12:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-06-15 19:49 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 20:28 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-15 20:54 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 01:59 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-06-24 09:33 +0300
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 09:58 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-24 13:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 13:53 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-24 14:51 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 16:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2026-06-24 20:35 -0700
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-25 09:21 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-25 10:12 +0100
csiph-web