Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #38077
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Pi PICO W on batteries |
| Date | 2026-06-24 16:41 +0100 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <111gtqv$348m3$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <n9avpnF383nU1@mid.individual.net> <110pjo1$jklg$1@dont-email.me> <sm0se6c8n2s.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <97F*HqVJA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <na2976Fn4t9U2@mid.individual.net> |
On 24/06/2026 15:51, Peter Heitzer wrote: > Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: >> Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote: >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >>> >>>> On 15/06/2026 19:49, Brian Gregory wrote: >>>>> nano timer ?? >>>>> What's that then? >>>> >>>> TPL5100 >>>> >>>> https://www.ti.com/product/TPL5110 >>> >>> I kinda thought modern microcontrollers have this sort of thing built >>> in? Oh, looks like the Pico (no W) draws 2 mA in "deep sleep" and this >>> timer draws 35 nA. >> >> That does sound surprisingly bad for the Pico. Seems that the RP2040 is >> 0.18mA in 'dormant' (ie deep sleep) and 0.38mA in 'sleep', which is a bit >> better. So must be something else on the Pico that's not so good in sleep >> mode. > I think (ultra) low power was not a primary design goal for the Pico. > I think that is very true. What attracted me was the amount of flash, and ram, the availability of wireless and ADCs and the price. Less than a pint of beer in a nightclub. Arduinos were 3 times the price The ZeroW running debian is a damn sight easier to code for, however. -- “There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” —Soren Kierkegaard
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-14 12:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-06-14 17:48 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 12:31 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 13:04 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:17 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 12:06 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 13:19 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-15 13:58 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 16:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2026-06-15 12:52 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2026-06-15 19:49 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-15 20:28 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-15 20:54 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-16 01:59 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2026-06-24 09:33 +0300
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 09:58 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-06-24 13:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 13:53 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries "Peter Heitzer" <peter.heitzer@rz.uni-regensburg.de> - 2026-06-24 14:51 +0000
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-24 16:41 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries wmartin <wwm@wwmartin.net> - 2026-06-24 20:35 -0700
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-06-25 09:21 +0100
Re: Pi PICO W on batteries The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-06-25 10:12 +0100
csiph-web