Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt > #44340

Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals?

From Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt, alt.engineering.electrical, sci.electronics.basics
Subject Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals?
Date 2026-06-20 20:14 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <1116lb0$8vp7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <1113i2e$3c8no$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <111474t$3ineh$1@dont-email.me> <11152k5$3p1nm$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> <1115d4r$3rg71$1@dont-email.me> <1115um3$1i5a$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/20/26 13:48, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 6/20/2026 2:48 PM, Paul wrote:
>>
>> When you do that, you have to know the tiling pattern of cells
>> on the chip surface. A silicon chip may not have an ....
> 
> I Google-ed a bit about what you said about "tiling pattern of cells
> on the chip surface". So all chips are just drawing nano-fine lines on 
> some special surfaces using special materia and light-etching machines? 
> It's not the same as integrated circuits???
> 
> What you said is not very much from magicians drawing seals using 
> magical wands!!! :)
> 
> 魔動王 - YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdU8PHV5LF4>
> 

It is a well-known fact that all electronics runs on magic smoke.
The proof is that when the smoke leaks out, it stops working.

Jeroen Belleman

Back to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-19 22:00 +0800
  Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-19 16:00 -0400
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-19 18:40 -0600
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 02:40 -0400
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 11:49 +0800
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 02:48 -0400
        Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 18:17 +0800
        Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 19:48 +0800
          Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 10:48 -0400
            Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 10:24 +0800
          Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-06-20 20:14 +0200
            Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 10:18 +0800
              Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-21 06:34 -0400
                Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 19:34 +0800
                Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-22 01:53 -0400
                Re: Are chips ... electronics dies & releaas "magic smoke"?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-22 14:09 +0800
  Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2026-06-21 17:49 +0800
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-23 20:59 +0800
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-23 10:20 -0600
        Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-24 00:28 +0800
          Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? pitter_smith <70620b9261c622c2c6443cb36988dd78336be458fd9f13499dd358523b105d91@example.com> - 2026-07-05 04:30 +0000
            Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 13:00 +0800

csiph-web