Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135174
| From | Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Naming issues in create-does |
| Date | 2026-06-13 06:33 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <110itki$2o3o7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <2026Jun11.192802@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <110hfag$2bsrn$1@dont-email.me> <2026Jun12.195246@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2026Jun12.202222@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <6a2ccb22$1@news.ausics.net> |
On 2026-06-13 03:14, dxf wrote: > On 13/06/2026 4:22 am, Anton Ertl wrote: >> anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes: >>> Overall, SET-DOES> is unambiguous and good enough. >> >> But while we are at it, according to Andrew Haley early Forth had USE >> with the same functionality as SET-DOES>. > > I don't recall that one. AFAIK the original definer was in the form: > > : ... CONSTANT ;: ... ; > > Presumably 2CONSTANT VARIABLE etc could also be used. Hard to find actual > examples as vintage code is scarce. > > In addition to CREATE DOES> F83 had: > > : CONSTANT (S n -- ) > CREATE , ;USES DOCONSTANT , > > a move closer to the xt variants. > > DX-Forth implemented BUILD to support its compilation model. I saw no > reason to persist with the 'CREATE then patch' concept. > > : CONSTANT ['] @ BUILD , ; BTW, do you consider `immediate` to be a from of patching as well? As for `does>`, I also prefer to pass an xt and avoid patching. However, for the sake of backward compatibility and support for legacy programs, we have to retain `does>` as well. I would like to introduce a basic factor of your `BUILD` that accept an xt and return other xt. How to call such a word? XXX ( xt1 -- xt2 ) Create a nameless definition with the execution token xt2. If the data-space pointer is not aligned, reserve enough data space to align it. The new data-space pointer defines the data field associated with xt2. No data space is allocated in the data field. The execution semantics identified by xt2 are as follows: Place the data filed address associated with xt2 on the stack and execute xt1. -- Ruvim
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-08 13:40 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus Jan Coombs <jan4etsept@murray-microft.co.uk> - 2026-06-08 13:16 +0100
Re: Back to the Forth Virus Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 12:23 +0000
Re: Back to the Forth Virus Daniel Cerqueira <dan.list@lispclub.com> - 2026-06-08 13:56 +0100
Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Back to the Forth Virus Daniel Cerqueira <dan.list@lispclub.com> - 2026-06-08 19:26 +0100
Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-08 20:06 +0000
GForth reproducible builds (was Re: Back to the Forth Virus) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 14:40 -0300
Re: Back to the Forth Virus minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2026-06-09 01:01 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-10 13:13 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2026-06-11 10:01 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-11 17:28 +0000
Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 17:23 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-12 17:52 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-12 18:22 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 13:14 +1000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 06:33 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 22:20 +1000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 15:55 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 13:08 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 19:58 +0200
Defining words in more than one step (was: Naming issues in create-does) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 06:46 +0000
Re: Defining words in more than one step dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-14 12:29 +1000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 19:59 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 10:25 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 15:30 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 17:30 +0000
Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-06-13 20:21 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 12:14 +1000
Re: Back to the Forth Virus "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-06-10 18:54 +0100
Re: Back to the Forth Virus dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-11 16:32 +1000
Re: Back to the Forth Virus "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-06-11 14:20 +0100
Re: Back to the Forth Virus Stephen Pelc <stephen@vfxforth.com> - 2026-06-09 10:22 +0000
Re: Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-10 15:55 +0200
Re: Back to the Forth Virus albert@SPENARNC.XS4ALL.NL - 2026-07-24 13:35 +0200
csiph-web