Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #135150

Re: Back to the Forth Virus

From Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Back to the Forth Virus
Date 2026-06-08 12:23 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <1106c8c$37c1i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <11069n1$3617t$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2026-06-08 11:40, clv2020 wrote:
> 
> some years passed and now I would be interested to try Forth again.
> 
> First question: Which Forth is used nowadays for PCs under Windows11? I 
> tried Win32Forth, ciForth and the old volksForth in an Oracle 
> VirtualBox. (gForth, bigForth, VFX, Swiftforth are too big for me for 
> the moment). What would you recommend?

A small and modern Forth system that I like: Post4
<https://codeberg.org/SirWumpus/post4>

However, at the moment, this system is not convenient enough when it 
comes to error reporting.


I would like to recommend SP-Forth/4 (which I currently maintain), but 
at the moment, you need to manually rename "SPF.eng.ERR" to "SPF.ERR" in 
the "lib/" directory to make the system output error messages in 
English. This will be fixed in the next release. To obtain the bleeding 
edge executable, you need download sources and run "src/compile.bat". 
Ask me if you have any problem.
<http://github.com/rufig/spf>


> The second question: All Forth systems I tried showed critical virus 
> warnings from Google Chrome or Microsoft defender. Even an old 
> volksForth vf38141.arc - no modern archive utiliy could read this format 
> - was captured by Chrome. Win32Forth seems to be kidnapped on about each 
> start by the Defender. I'm not very amused to turn all IT security off 
> to use Forth. Is there a chance to solve this issue?
> 

A reliable way is to build the executable file by yourself.

Gforth can be build and used under WSL on Windows from a tarball; see 
the instruction at:
<https://gforth.org/#:~:text=Build%20from%20Tarball>

Aside from a number of dependencies and the lengthy build process, 
Gforth is quite user-friendly.


--
Ruvim

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-08 13:40 +0200
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus Jan Coombs <jan4etsept@murray-microft.co.uk> - 2026-06-08 13:16 +0100
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 12:23 +0000
    Re: Back to the Forth Virus Daniel Cerqueira <dan.list@lispclub.com> - 2026-06-08 13:56 +0100
      Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-08 15:40 +0000
        Re: Back to the Forth Virus Daniel Cerqueira <dan.list@lispclub.com> - 2026-06-08 19:26 +0100
          Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-08 20:06 +0000
        GForth reproducible builds (was Re: Back to the Forth Virus) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-02 14:40 -0300
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2026-06-09 01:01 +0200
    Re: Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-10 13:13 +0200
      Re: Back to the Forth Virus minforth <minforth@gmx.net> - 2026-06-11 10:01 +0200
        Re: Back to the Forth Virus anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-11 17:28 +0000
          Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 17:23 +0000
            Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-12 17:52 +0000
              Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-12 18:22 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 13:14 +1000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 06:33 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 22:20 +1000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 15:55 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-15 13:08 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2026-07-23 19:58 +0200
                Defining words in more than one step (was: Naming issues in create-does) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 06:46 +0000
                Re: Defining words in more than one step dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-14 12:29 +1000
              Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 19:59 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 10:25 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does Ruvim <ruvim.pinka@gmail.com> - 2026-06-13 15:30 +0000
                Re: Naming issues in create-does anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2026-06-13 17:30 +0000
              Re: Naming issues in create-does (was: Back to the Forth Virus) peter <peter.noreply@tin.it> - 2026-06-13 20:21 +0200
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 12:14 +1000
    Re: Back to the Forth Virus "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-06-10 18:54 +0100
      Re: Back to the Forth Virus dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2026-06-11 16:32 +1000
        Re: Back to the Forth Virus "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-06-11 14:20 +0100
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus Stephen Pelc <stephen@vfxforth.com> - 2026-06-09 10:22 +0000
    Re: Back to the Forth Virus clv2020 <clv2020@vodafonemail.de> - 2026-06-10 15:55 +0200
  Re: Back to the Forth Virus albert@SPENARNC.XS4ALL.NL - 2026-07-24 13:35 +0200

csiph-web