Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.buddha.short.fat.guy > #394927
| From | dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic, comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives |
| Date | 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1105m7a$2vg22$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <11055b4$2tatt$1@dont-email.me> <98cc2lh0l8oao75tsrabj8rbsm3mvve0nn@4ax.com> <1105cvl$2uu2j$1@dont-email.me> <1105da9$2u9o0$6@dont-email.me> <1105el4$2v93v$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 6/7/26 8:58 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/7/2026 10:35 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 6/7/26 8:29 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/7/2026 10:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 20:19:32 -0500, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/7/2026 8:12 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 6/7/26 5:52 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 7:29 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 4:30 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 5:49 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 12:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 8:07 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:44:14 +0200, Moebius >>>>>>>>>>>>> <moebius@example.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 07.06.2026 um 15:23 schrieb dart200: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> column >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> building >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hint: This was not just an ordinary "fire". This has to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consideration. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> WTC7 involved a fairly normal office fire, unlike WTC1/2 it was >>>>>>>>>>>> not hit by a jet >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sophisticated Computer-simulations have SHOWN that the course >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of events >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is totally "plausible" i.e. possible in this case. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... no computer simulation has shown how a fairly normal >>>>>>>>>>>> office fire can cause near-simultaneous failure across *all* >>>>>>>>>>>> structural columns >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> there is an incredibly weak, "official" argument from NIST >>>>>>>>>>>> that: >>>>>>>>>>>> - (a) didn't show near-simultaneous failure of all >>>>>>>>>>>> structural >>>>>>>>>>>> columns >>>>>>>>>>>> - (b) didn't result in a progression that remotely >>>>>>>>>>>> matches the >>>>>>>>>>>> videos >>>>>>>>>>>> - (c) didn't model column-girder connections correctly >>>>>>>>>>>> - (d) didn't model shear studs bolting the girders to the >>>>>>>>>>>> floor >>>>>>>>>>>> above >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> they left out details and didn't produce anything that looks >>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>> the videos. it is incredible how unwilling most people are in >>>>>>>>>>>> doing just a modicum of critical thinking, and witnessing it >>>>>>>>>>>> really has made me question the nature of human intelligence... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> it is worth noting that WTC7 is the *only* example of an type-1 >>>>>>>>>>>> fire- safe skyscraper proposed to have collapsed due to fire as >>>>>>>>>>>> the primary and sole cause. there are in fact _very_ few >>>>>>>>>>>> examples >>>>>>>>>>>> of skyscrapers collapsing at all, let alone fully, let alone >>>>>>>>>>>> due >>>>>>>>>>>> to fire, across the entire history of building large buildings. >>>>>>>>>>>> which is really quite amazing considering our safety >>>>>>>>>>>> standards in >>>>>>>>>>>> building these things even penetrates the 3rd world quite well. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The alternative back in Sept 2011 that the US >>>>>>>>>>> government would murder thousands of US citizens >>>>>>>>>>> for political advantage is (at that time) too >>>>>>>>>>> unreasonably implausible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> it was zionists in the US govt, not the US govt overall >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I personally know a guy that honestly believes that the >>>>>>>>> airplanes that crashed into the twin towers never existed >>>>>>>>> and were planted in the minds of witnesses through CIA mind >>>>>>>>> control devices. What about the video tapes? What about >>>>>>>>> the airplane wreckage? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is possible that a giant purple space alien that >>>>>>>>> is living inside the hollow Moon did it. It is not >>>>>>>>> reasonable plausible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this is called a nut-picking fallacy, in an attempt to form a >>>>>>>> guilt- >>>>>>>> by- association fallacy, which falls under the larger umbrella >>>>>>>> of red >>>>>>>> herrings, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i assure you that nothing about 9/11 truth breaks known laws of >>>>>>>> conventional physics, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and rather unexplained physics is a contention i have with the >>>>>>>> official narrative >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Believing that it is an inside job ignores the airplanes. >>>>>>> Believing that the airplanes never existed resolves this. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> WTC1 and WTC2 were hit by airplanes, but getting hit by airplanes >>>>>> does >>>>>> _not_ contradict the subsequent demolitions... >>>>>> >>>>>> WTC7, a 47 story skyscraper, was not even hit by an airplane, yet >>>>>> it was >>>>>> _also_ demolitioned, to collapse at free fall into it's footprint >>>>> >>>>> Believing that the whole thing was an inside job >>>>> is totally nuts, are you totally nuts? >>>> >>>> oooh, good one. Now all you need to do is convince him that the >>>> experts who spent three years analyzing what happened and concluded >>>> the building was not destroyed by a bomb actually might know something >>>> he does not. >>> >>> Not at all. >>> We use Socratic Questioning and ask him: >>> How the Hell do you explain the airplanes in any >>> "inside job" narrative? >>> >>> BZZZTT Bing short-circuit !!! >>> >> >> because airplanes hit the buildings to put all the attention and blame >> on muzzies ... >> >> and then zionist warhawk joos blew up the buildings to seal the deal >> for the _wAr On TeRrOR_ >> >> neither of these fact contradict each other, u've short-circuited nothing >> > > You just showed the short-circuit. > You cannot coherently explain the airplanes > within the frame-of-reference of an "inside job". > yes you can. the cia, saudis, and mossad had already funneled billions of USD and weapons to mujahideen in the 80s to fight the soviets. they already knew they way around funding afgan bushmen. which they helped covertly train and execute for the 911 job. and i mean covertly, so they did this using assets who didn't come off as westerners dummy, and the muzzies were ofc happy to oblige. the point was to enter america into the _wAr On TeRrOR_ -- why are we god? let's end war 🙃
Back to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:03 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:57 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:02 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:19 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:17 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:22 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:27 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:38 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:46 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:34 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:39 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:55 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:06 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:13 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 19:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 06:23 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 11:07 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 10:37 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 19:55 +0200
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 11:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:25 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:23 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:34 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:01 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 16:20 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:37 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 15:49 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 18:30 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 17:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 19:52 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 18:12 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:19 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 23:06 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:35 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:58 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:13 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:10 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 09:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:27 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:02 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:22 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:31 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:46 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 11:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:51 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:22 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:44 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 17:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 20:27 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 21:27 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 16:58 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 20:45 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 20:43 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:08 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:46 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 23:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 09:54 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 07:19 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:04 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:19 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 09:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 14:39 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 15:17 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 23:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-10 08:00 -0400
Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 11:47 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:41 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:35 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 23:06 -0400
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:45 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:37 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:41 -0700
Waddyamean Assholery Notes Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:55 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-11 19:20 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-11 21:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 07:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 08:11 -0400
Sustainable Food Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 20:07 -0700
Re: Sustainable Food dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:50 -0700
Nick's WTC Jewish Conspiracy Theory Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:28 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:51 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 10:49 -0400
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:08 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:30 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:37 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 23:27 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:26 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:48 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:00 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:37 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:47 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:48 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 12:16 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:46 -0700
Altered States of Mind With the Fly Agaric Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 17:01 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:22 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 21:05 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 21:43 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 22:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:51 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:54 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:57 -0700
csiph-web