Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.buddha.short.fat.guy > #394908
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic, comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives |
| Date | 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1105cvl$2uu2j$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <11052e5$2s43l$3@dont-email.me> <11053o0$2svfj$1@dont-email.me> <11054uj$2t6l2$1@dont-email.me> <11055b4$2tatt$1@dont-email.me> <98cc2lh0l8oao75tsrabj8rbsm3mvve0nn@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 6/7/2026 10:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 20:19:32 -0500, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 6/7/2026 8:12 PM, dart200 wrote: >>> On 6/7/26 5:52 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 6/7/2026 7:29 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>> On 6/7/26 4:30 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 6/7/2026 5:49 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/7/26 12:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 8:07 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:44:14 +0200, Moebius >>>>>>>>>> <moebius@example.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 07.06.2026 um 15:23 schrieb dart200: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction >>>>>>>>>>>>> job. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ column >>>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>>> building >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hint: This was not just an ordinary "fire". This has to be >>>>>>>>>>> taken in >>>>>>>>>>> consideration. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WTC7 involved a fairly normal office fire, unlike WTC1/2 it was >>>>>>>>> not hit by a jet >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sophisticated Computer-simulations have SHOWN that the course >>>>>>>>>>> of events >>>>>>>>>>> is totally "plausible" i.e. possible in this case. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> uhhh ... no computer simulation has shown how a fairly normal >>>>>>>>> office fire can cause near-simultaneous failure across *all* >>>>>>>>> structural columns >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there is an incredibly weak, "official" argument from NIST that: >>>>>>>>> - (a) didn't show near-simultaneous failure of all structural >>>>>>>>> columns >>>>>>>>> - (b) didn't result in a progression that remotely matches the >>>>>>>>> videos >>>>>>>>> - (c) didn't model column-girder connections correctly >>>>>>>>> - (d) didn't model shear studs bolting the girders to the floor >>>>>>>>> above >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> they left out details and didn't produce anything that looks like >>>>>>>>> the videos. it is incredible how unwilling most people are in >>>>>>>>> doing just a modicum of critical thinking, and witnessing it >>>>>>>>> really has made me question the nature of human intelligence... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> it is worth noting that WTC7 is the *only* example of an type-1 >>>>>>>>> fire- safe skyscraper proposed to have collapsed due to fire as >>>>>>>>> the primary and sole cause. there are in fact _very_ few examples >>>>>>>>> of skyscrapers collapsing at all, let alone fully, let alone due >>>>>>>>> to fire, across the entire history of building large buildings. >>>>>>>>> which is really quite amazing considering our safety standards in >>>>>>>>> building these things even penetrates the 3rd world quite well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The alternative back in Sept 2011 that the US >>>>>>>> government would murder thousands of US citizens >>>>>>>> for political advantage is (at that time) too >>>>>>>> unreasonably implausible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> it was zionists in the US govt, not the US govt overall >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I personally know a guy that honestly believes that the >>>>>> airplanes that crashed into the twin towers never existed >>>>>> and were planted in the minds of witnesses through CIA mind >>>>>> control devices. What about the video tapes? What about >>>>>> the airplane wreckage? >>>>>> >>>>>> It is possible that a giant purple space alien that >>>>>> is living inside the hollow Moon did it. It is not >>>>>> reasonable plausible. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> this is called a nut-picking fallacy, in an attempt to form a guilt- >>>>> by- association fallacy, which falls under the larger umbrella of red >>>>> herrings, >>>>> >>>>> i assure you that nothing about 9/11 truth breaks known laws of >>>>> conventional physics, >>>>> >>>>> and rather unexplained physics is a contention i have with the >>>>> official narrative >>>>> >>>> >>>> Believing that it is an inside job ignores the airplanes. >>>> Believing that the airplanes never existed resolves this. >>>> >>> >>> WTC1 and WTC2 were hit by airplanes, but getting hit by airplanes does >>> _not_ contradict the subsequent demolitions... >>> >>> WTC7, a 47 story skyscraper, was not even hit by an airplane, yet it was >>> _also_ demolitioned, to collapse at free fall into it's footprint >> >> Believing that the whole thing was an inside job >> is totally nuts, are you totally nuts? > > oooh, good one. Now all you need to do is convince him that the > experts who spent three years analyzing what happened and concluded > the building was not destroyed by a bomb actually might know something > he does not. Not at all. We use Socratic Questioning and ask him: How the Hell do you explain the airplanes in any "inside job" narrative? BZZZTT Bing short-circuit !!! -- Copyright 2026 Olcott My 28 year goal has been to make "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language" reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge. The complete structure of this system is now defined. The entire body of knowledge expressed in language is comprised of two types of relations between finite strings: (a) *Axioms* Expressions of language that are stipulated to be true. My system bridges the analytic/synthetic distinction by expressly encoding all empirical "atomic facts" in a formal language such as CycL of the Cyc project. (b) *Inference Rules* Expressions of language that are semantically entailed syntactically from (a) and/or (b).
Back to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:03 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:57 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:02 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:19 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:17 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:22 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:27 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:38 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:46 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:34 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:39 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:55 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:06 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:13 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 19:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 06:23 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 11:07 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 10:37 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 19:55 +0200
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 11:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:25 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:23 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:34 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:01 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 16:20 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:37 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 15:49 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 18:30 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 17:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 19:52 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 18:12 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:19 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 23:06 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:35 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:58 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:13 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:10 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 09:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:27 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:02 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:22 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:31 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:46 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 11:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:51 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:22 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:44 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 17:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 20:27 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 21:27 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 16:58 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 20:45 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 20:43 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:08 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:46 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 23:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 09:54 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 07:19 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:04 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:19 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 09:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 14:39 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 15:17 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 23:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-10 08:00 -0400
Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 11:47 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:41 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:35 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 23:06 -0400
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:45 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:37 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:41 -0700
Waddyamean Assholery Notes Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:55 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-11 19:20 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-11 21:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 07:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 08:11 -0400
Sustainable Food Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 20:07 -0700
Re: Sustainable Food dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:50 -0700
Nick's WTC Jewish Conspiracy Theory Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:28 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:51 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 10:49 -0400
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:08 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:30 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:37 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 23:27 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:26 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:48 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:00 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:37 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:47 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:48 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 12:16 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:46 -0700
Altered States of Mind With the Fly Agaric Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 17:01 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:22 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 21:05 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 21:43 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 22:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:51 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:54 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:57 -0700
csiph-web