Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.buddha.short.fat.guy > #394905
| From | dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic, comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? |
| Date | 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1105cj0$2u9pf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <11052e5$2s43l$3@dont-email.me> <11053o0$2svfj$1@dont-email.me> <11054uj$2t6l2$1@dont-email.me> <11055b4$2tatt$1@dont-email.me> <98cc2lh0l8oao75tsrabj8rbsm3mvve0nn@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 6/7/26 8:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 20:19:32 -0500, olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/7/2026 8:12 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 6/7/26 5:52 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/7/2026 7:29 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 6/7/26 4:30 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 5:49 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 12:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 8:07 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:44:14 +0200, Moebius
>>>>>>>>>> <moebius@example.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 07.06.2026 um 15:23 schrieb dart200:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction
>>>>>>>>>>>>> job.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ column
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hint: This was not just an ordinary "fire". This has to be
>>>>>>>>>>> taken in
>>>>>>>>>>> consideration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WTC7 involved a fairly normal office fire, unlike WTC1/2 it was
>>>>>>>>> not hit by a jet
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sophisticated Computer-simulations have SHOWN that the course
>>>>>>>>>>> of events
>>>>>>>>>>> is totally "plausible" i.e. possible in this case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... no computer simulation has shown how a fairly normal
>>>>>>>>> office fire can cause near-simultaneous failure across *all*
>>>>>>>>> structural columns
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there is an incredibly weak, "official" argument from NIST that:
>>>>>>>>> - (a) didn't show near-simultaneous failure of all structural
>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>> - (b) didn't result in a progression that remotely matches the
>>>>>>>>> videos
>>>>>>>>> - (c) didn't model column-girder connections correctly
>>>>>>>>> - (d) didn't model shear studs bolting the girders to the floor
>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> they left out details and didn't produce anything that looks like
>>>>>>>>> the videos. it is incredible how unwilling most people are in
>>>>>>>>> doing just a modicum of critical thinking, and witnessing it
>>>>>>>>> really has made me question the nature of human intelligence...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it is worth noting that WTC7 is the *only* example of an type-1
>>>>>>>>> fire- safe skyscraper proposed to have collapsed due to fire as
>>>>>>>>> the primary and sole cause. there are in fact _very_ few examples
>>>>>>>>> of skyscrapers collapsing at all, let alone fully, let alone due
>>>>>>>>> to fire, across the entire history of building large buildings.
>>>>>>>>> which is really quite amazing considering our safety standards in
>>>>>>>>> building these things even penetrates the 3rd world quite well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The alternative back in Sept 2011 that the US
>>>>>>>> government would murder thousands of US citizens
>>>>>>>> for political advantage is (at that time) too
>>>>>>>> unreasonably implausible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it was zionists in the US govt, not the US govt overall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally know a guy that honestly believes that the
>>>>>> airplanes that crashed into the twin towers never existed
>>>>>> and were planted in the minds of witnesses through CIA mind
>>>>>> control devices. What about the video tapes? What about
>>>>>> the airplane wreckage?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is possible that a giant purple space alien that
>>>>>> is living inside the hollow Moon did it. It is not
>>>>>> reasonable plausible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> this is called a nut-picking fallacy, in an attempt to form a guilt-
>>>>> by- association fallacy, which falls under the larger umbrella of red
>>>>> herrings,
>>>>>
>>>>> i assure you that nothing about 9/11 truth breaks known laws of
>>>>> conventional physics,
>>>>>
>>>>> and rather unexplained physics is a contention i have with the
>>>>> official narrative
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Believing that it is an inside job ignores the airplanes.
>>>> Believing that the airplanes never existed resolves this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> WTC1 and WTC2 were hit by airplanes, but getting hit by airplanes does
>>> _not_ contradict the subsequent demolitions...
>>>
>>> WTC7, a 47 story skyscraper, was not even hit by an airplane, yet it was
>>> _also_ demolitioned, to collapse at free fall into it's footprint
>>
>> Believing that the whole thing was an inside job
>> is totally nuts, are you totally nuts?
> that's just a blatant ad hominem dud, do better
>
> #god
>
> oooh, good one. Now all you need to do is convince him that the
> experts who spent three years analyzing what happened and concluded
> the building was not destroyed by a bomb actually might know something
> he does not.
believing WTC7 came down due to an office fire causing a single
column failure as demonstrated by a simulation that doesn't even
remotely match the videos in a novel event never witnessed again
or even taken seriously as a noteworthy case study by the
firefighting practice more generally 25 years later...
is a 47-story skyscraper of abject physical absurdity that ur
pathetic attempts at fallacy will never collapse into it's
footprint at fucking freefall 🫳
🎤
(unless ur some zionist warkawk joo with novel, engineered
thermitic-explosives, in which case 🖕🖕🖕 for being america's
#1 enemy of the 21st century)
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃
ps: get a 21st century reader noah
Back to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:03 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:57 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:02 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:19 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:17 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:22 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:27 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:38 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:46 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:03 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:34 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:39 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 19:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:55 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:06 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:13 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 05:10 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 19:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 06:23 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 16:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 11:07 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 10:37 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 19:55 +0200
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 11:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:25 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 14:23 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:34 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:01 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 16:20 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:37 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 15:49 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 18:30 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 17:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 19:52 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 18:12 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:19 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 23:06 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:35 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:58 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:13 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:10 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 09:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:27 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:02 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:22 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:31 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:46 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 11:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:51 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:22 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:44 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 17:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 20:27 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 21:27 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 16:58 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 20:45 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 20:43 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:08 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 21:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 00:46 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 23:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 09:54 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 07:19 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:04 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 11:19 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 09:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-09 14:39 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 15:17 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 23:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-10 08:00 -0400
Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 11:47 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:41 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:35 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 23:06 -0400
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:45 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 18:37 -0700
Re: Nick's Official Narrative Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:41 -0700
Waddyamean Assholery Notes Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:55 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-11 19:20 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-11 21:45 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 07:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-12 08:11 -0400
Sustainable Food Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 20:07 -0700
Re: Sustainable Food dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-12 20:50 -0700
Nick's WTC Jewish Conspiracy Theory Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:28 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:51 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 10:49 -0400
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:08 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 14:30 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 23:37 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:04 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 23:27 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:26 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:48 -0500
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:00 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:37 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:44 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:47 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-09 06:48 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 12:16 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-10 12:46 -0700
Altered States of Mind With the Fly Agaric Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 17:01 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 04:22 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 20:49 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 21:05 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-05 21:43 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-05 22:55 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:51 -0700
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-06 22:54 +0200
Re: the arithmetic hierarchy is kinda bs isn't it? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2026-06-06 13:57 -0700
csiph-web