Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.telecom |
| Subject | Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues |
| Date | 2026-05-22 11:46 +0100 |
| Organization | No affiliation |
| Message-ID | <10upc61$1dh4e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <10ul8vf$38ia$1@dont-email.me> <n77nneFlpidU1@mid.individual.net> <10umb58$i3t0$1@dont-email.me> <n77s9cFmevqU1@mid.individual.net> <4Qv*VD7GA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> |
On 21/05/2026 11:26, Theo wrote: > Your router keeps registered with your ISP's SIP server. I'm not sure > there's VLANs involved, at least for some ISPs you can connect over the > internet if you can find out the login details (which they try to hide from > you). This only applies to ISPs like BT retail, who provide a combined service. Some ISPs don't provide telephony and some sell their ITSP and ISP services as different, and separable, products, so you can use the telephony over any other ISP, who doesn't block the ports used. The sort of provider that sells independent products doesn't lock down the login credentials. BT use a VLAN to carry the PPP over Ethernet for their combined voice service, and distinguish it from the PPP over Ethernet for the internet service. I think it would be theoretically possible to use their voice service with a different head end internet service provider. With providers that provide ITSP services separately, the SIP user agent need not be part of the router, or you could have one in the router, and also direct IP connections to other ones. They would use the same PPP over Ethernet connection for both internet and telephone. > > The ISP server looks up the number in the database, finds which client it > needs to talk to. It sends a message to the SIP client in your router Pet peeve. It sends it to the SIP server in the router. It might be technically valid to say a VoIP client, but SIP is a symmetric protocol, unlike analogue telephony, and the side initiating the call is the SIP Client User Agent (UAC), and the side receiving it is the SIP Server User Agent (UAS), so once one introduces SIP, one should align with the SIP usage of client and server. (Actually, it is possible for UAS and UAC client roles to switch during a call.)
Back to uk.telecom | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Analogue to Digital Voice issues Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-20 22:27 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-21 07:40 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-21 08:10 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-05-21 08:58 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2026-05-21 11:26 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> - 2026-05-22 11:46 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2026-05-21 09:11 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Nick Finnigan <nix@genie.co.uk> - 2026-05-21 10:27 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-21 10:37 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-23 12:13 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-23 12:44 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-05-23 20:29 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-24 10:42 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-24 11:30 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-24 13:36 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-24 15:24 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-24 16:41 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-25 10:26 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-25 11:29 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-26 09:13 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-25 10:28 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2026-05-25 12:35 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-05-25 17:45 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-26 09:16 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Trolleybus <ken@birchanger.com> - 2026-05-26 09:15 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues David Wade <g4ugm@dave.invalid> - 2026-05-21 19:08 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues Davey <davey@example.invalid> - 2026-05-21 20:04 +0100
Re: Analogue to Digital Voice issues grinch <grinch@somewhere.net> - 2026-05-22 10:26 +0100
csiph-web