Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #895194

Re: "Intercept" THIS :-)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/17/26 8:18 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
> On 2/17/26 7:37 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>> On 2/9/26 8:19 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>> On 2/8/26 12:47 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>>> On 2/8/26 12:36 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>>>> On 2/7/26 5:20 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/YSHGPvRs/Khorramshahr-4.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hehe :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Iran's military has just found one of the American bunker buster 14 
>>>>> ton bombs that were dropped last June in Iran has failed to go off. 
>>>>> Scientists are now struggling to have the military move the 
>>>>> unexploded ordinance to their labs for reverse engineering :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hehe :)
>>>>>
>>>>> If you found a piece of news later that said Iran has made a 
>>>>> special missile that can carry a 15 or so tons payload, you know 
>>>>> what that will mean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This was by the way disclosed by Iran's foreign minister himself. 
>>>> This is how it looks like:
>>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/MKb1Z1Tq/bunker-buster.jpg
>>>>
>>>> I know why Araghchi revealed this. I see no other reason for it. He 
>>>> is probably indirectly telling Israelis their nuclear industries 
>>>> will soon be reachable, then toast :-)
>>>>
>>>> Hehehehe :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But that would require a HUGE rocket, going straight above into 
>>> space, then coming back down just as Earth's rotation places Israel 
>>> smack underneath, so the least amount of fuel would be needed for 
>>> such an unusually heavy payload. A one-use type of weapon. Made for 
>>> Israel :)
>>>
>>> Iran, by the way, has developed (and tested) ICBM type also. Tests 
>>> were done on them launching from a distant point in Iran and coming 
>>> down on northern Siberia. The orbits they tried were rather similar 
>>> to orbits from north Siberia to the United States. And they are for 
>>> now stationed in Northern Siberia in case of USA doing something out 
>>> of proportion to Iran. These orbits pass over Greenland and Canada 
>>> both, but mainly Greenland :) So Trump must've become aware of such 
>>> missiles in the northern Siberia, belonging and under the control of 
>>> Iranians, shortly before he began thinking about Greenland (and 
>>> Canada). Hehe :)
>>>
>>> Russians by all probability voluntarily helped Iranians on that 
>>> particular form of project, much in contrast to their extreme 
>>> unwillingness in helping Iran against Israel. They even secretly help 
>>> Israel against Iran. Definitely at least in intelligence gathering.
>>>
>>> And since it wouldn't make much sense to build ICBMs for conventional 
>>> payloads, these Iranian ones must be all ready to carry nuclear bombs.
>>>
>>> Since they're long-range, European countries can also become targets 
>>> for them, should that day arrive. For Iran, these ICBMs are a must to 
>>> have for survival. Without them USA would've certainly used nukes 
>>> against Iran.
>>>
>>> So none of you Bitch countries and your boss, USA, can nuke Iran. You 
>>> can only lick those thousands of nukes you have, for now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Iran's leader today in a live speech broadcast in front of a large 
>> number of people said this:
>>
>>     "A U.S. warship is a very dangerous piece of equipment. But 
>> something that can send it down to the depths of the ocean is more 
>> dangerous!"
>>
>> Hahhahahhh :-)) Well said, old man :)
>>
>> He was probably referring to the Hoot. None of these ships are safe 
>> against Hoots. There's simply no defense against Hoots. Look that up :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> There was another thing about that speech that's worth mentioning. Right 
> behind an above him, a large banner was held against the wall with a 
> piece of calligraphy in the style of 9th century Iran written on it. The 
> words were in Arabic, a quote from Quran (in a paragraph in Baghareh, 
> 194th Ayeh). It translates to:
> 
>     "So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that 
> he has assaulted you."
> 
> This, I think, carries two significant messages. One is that of course 
> when hit, Iran _will_ hit back at U.S. possessions in the region. So 
> here the leader had one more time emphasized this decision of his. It 
> will be a very messy war! The second significant message in it is more 
> ominous. I think it points to a nuclear scenario, in which the USA's 
> nuclear attack on Iran (to make things less expensive) will be responded 
> with nuclear attack by Iran, on the USA. I mentioned earlier the 
> existence of Iranian ICBM stationed in Northern Siberia. I think he has 
> ordered the commanders to hit mainland USA by those nukes right after 
> Iran is hit by nukes. "... the same way"!
> 
> So watch out. He isn't bullshitting. He never bullshits. This thing, 
> should you get cute, can cost you dearly. So forget the "cheapest way" 
> scenario crap. It won't be cheap. It will be the most expensive.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Speaking of missiles, Iran used only a few of her best missiles in the 
12-day war last June. Less than 5 of them in fact. They did it! Here is 
the newly come out video of the very last one which hit Israel right 
before cease fire went into effect:

https://streamable.com/677dqz

This link will expire in 2 days, so download it if you want to keep it.

Did you see the speed of the thing?.. Virtually impossible to intercept. 
Perhaps 1% chance of accidentally intercepting it. It is just too fast. 
Israel boasts that Iran's skies were under its control within a couple 
of days. Well, Israel's skies were also under Iran's control from the 
day one!

Iran used the old and earlier versions to both inflict harm and use up 
most of Israel's and its allies' defensive missiles. This task was 
completed in about 10 days. Then Iran began to launch the best ones, one 
by one! No need to provide distractions. Each one of them safely passed 
through all layers of defense and hit their targets (two ports in Haifa 
and Ashdod). And Israelis immediately urged USA to ask Iran for cease fire.

Funny to see that even in this unforeseen operation, Iran attempted to 
test a bunch of stuff :) Truly some commanders there know what they're 
doing without getting distracted by losses. In the midst of all that 
crap, they tested to find what uses up enemies' defensive systems for 
sure, and what can make it there at the targets without any support 
system, and with dead certainty!

Iran is ready for this "war" (fake one). More than that, I'm personally 
itching for it to start. I have desired it since a quarter of a century 
back. It must happen. It is only fair that this war happens. It is good 
for Iran and Iranians, and it will resolve a horde of problems that 
Americans have, all stemming from the question of Israel.

Any advancement in the defenses in Iran, under this notoriously lazy 
regime, has taken place when a certain threat against her was realized. 
Each one of such advances has that reason behind it. This is crap. This 
is not building defense. I think in a real war against USA and Israel, 
Iran will rapidly advance in creating defensing systems. Time will be on 
Iran's side.

And time won't be on Iran's side without a war.

To kick a mullah's ass into action, nothing short of war works. It has 
to come to immediate threat for their existence for them to lift their 
unbelievably lazy and selfish asses to do their jobs properly. Israelis 
in fact love those mullahs. If any other Iranians were in their shoes, 
Israel would've turned into a tame sheep decades back.

But now Israelis are talking about invading the whole region. This is 
the effect of having mullahs in power in Iran.

Iranians, one way or another, will correct that! Wait and see for 
yourselves. If this fake war doesn't materialize, another real one will 
begin. Cause it must happen.


So watch this video, Iran's last cordial message for you Israelis, and 
then "intercept" THIS!

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-07 17:20 -0600
  Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-08 12:36 -0600
    Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-08 12:47 -0600
      Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-09 20:19 -0600
        Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 19:37 -0600
          Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 20:18 -0600
            Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 12:29 -0600
              Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) x <x@x.net> - 2026-02-26 12:21 -0800
              Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 14:59 -0600
                Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 15:48 -0600
                Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 14:21 -0600
    Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-02-09 09:50 +0000
      Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-09 19:37 -0600

csiph-web