Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #895143

Re: "Intercept" THIS :-)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/9/26 8:19 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
> On 2/8/26 12:47 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>> On 2/8/26 12:36 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>> On 2/7/26 5:20 PM, Taskfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://i.postimg.cc/YSHGPvRs/Khorramshahr-4.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hehe :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Iran's military has just found one of the American bunker buster 14 
>>> ton bombs that were dropped last June in Iran has failed to go off. 
>>> Scientists are now struggling to have the military move the 
>>> unexploded ordinance to their labs for reverse engineering :-)
>>>
>>> Hehe :)
>>>
>>> If you found a piece of news later that said Iran has made a special 
>>> missile that can carry a 15 or so tons payload, you know what that 
>>> will mean.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> This was by the way disclosed by Iran's foreign minister himself. This 
>> is how it looks like:
>>
>> https://i.postimg.cc/MKb1Z1Tq/bunker-buster.jpg
>>
>> I know why Araghchi revealed this. I see no other reason for it. He is 
>> probably indirectly telling Israelis their nuclear industries will 
>> soon be reachable, then toast :-)
>>
>> Hehehehe :)
>>
>>
> 
> 
> But that would require a HUGE rocket, going straight above into space, 
> then coming back down just as Earth's rotation places Israel smack 
> underneath, so the least amount of fuel would be needed for such an 
> unusually heavy payload. A one-use type of weapon. Made for Israel :)
> 
> Iran, by the way, has developed (and tested) ICBM type also. Tests were 
> done on them launching from a distant point in Iran and coming down on 
> northern Siberia. The orbits they tried were rather similar to orbits 
> from north Siberia to the United States. And they are for now stationed 
> in Northern Siberia in case of USA doing something out of proportion to 
> Iran. These orbits pass over Greenland and Canada both, but mainly 
> Greenland :) So Trump must've become aware of such missiles in the 
> northern Siberia, belonging and under the control of Iranians, shortly 
> before he began thinking about Greenland (and Canada). Hehe :)
> 
> Russians by all probability voluntarily helped Iranians on that 
> particular form of project, much in contrast to their extreme 
> unwillingness in helping Iran against Israel. They even secretly help 
> Israel against Iran. Definitely at least in intelligence gathering.
> 
> And since it wouldn't make much sense to build ICBMs for conventional 
> payloads, these Iranian ones must be all ready to carry nuclear bombs.
> 
> Since they're long-range, European countries can also become targets for 
> them, should that day arrive. For Iran, these ICBMs are a must to have 
> for survival. Without them USA would've certainly used nukes against Iran.
> 
> So none of you Bitch countries and your boss, USA, can nuke Iran. You 
> can only lick those thousands of nukes you have, for now.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Iran's leader today in a live speech broadcast in front of a large 
number of people said this:

    "A U.S. warship is a very dangerous piece of equipment. But 
something that can send it down to the depths of the ocean is more 
dangerous!"

Hahhahahhh :-)) Well said, old man :)

He was probably referring to the Hoot. None of these ships are safe 
against Hoots. There's simply no defense against Hoots. Look that up :)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-07 17:20 -0600
  Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-08 12:36 -0600
    Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-08 12:47 -0600
      Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-09 20:19 -0600
        Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 19:37 -0600
          Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-17 20:18 -0600
            Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-25 12:29 -0600
              Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) x <x@x.net> - 2026-02-26 12:21 -0800
              Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 14:59 -0600
                Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-26 15:48 -0600
                Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-27 14:21 -0600
    Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-02-09 09:50 +0000
      Re: "Intercept" THIS :-) Taskfreak <taskfreak@gmail.com> - 2026-02-09 19:37 -0600

csiph-web