Re: Semantic properties of finite string inputs --- deliberately misleading

From	Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk>
Newsgroups	comp.theory
Subject	Re: Semantic properties of finite string inputs --- deliberately misleading
Date	2025-11-01 21:16 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<10e5tbj$1i3jo$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <20251031212218.459@kylheku.com> <10e5imf$1eurs$2@dont-email.me> <10e5k2f$1flv8$1@dont-email.me> <10e5q7r$1i3jo$3@dont-email.me> <10e5qpm$1ih4r$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/11/2025 20:32, olcott wrote:
> Thanks for responding. My initial estimate
> is that you are very competent.

Thank you for the compliment, Although what are the labels of your
scale? perhaps dipshit < very competent < idiot < novice < great <
generally superior?

Also thank you for being so patient and organised if not silent. Should
I look at the web and scream now, or under the bridge and scream?

How many posts in the comp.theory newsgroup of the segment of usenet
I've been interacting with (if one could call it a segment) have been
created/selected by non-humans?

--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.

Thread

csiph-web