Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > misc.phone.mobile.iphone > #197271
| From | Marion <marion@facts.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of |
| Date | 2025-08-24 01:22 +0000 |
| Organization | BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) |
| Message-ID | <108dpgs$2h7d$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <1085e23$ijc4$1@dont-email.me> <1085o78$19er$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <1088364$16qaa$1@dont-email.me> <1088j4m$2usu$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <108ca8h$254ah$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:56:01 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote : >> You're desperate to prove me correct that there is only one thing on all of >> iOS that isn't on Android, and that's the use of the privileged port 445. > > It would be funny if it wasn't so chronically sad. > > If you put even an iota of the effort you do in criticising ios to looking > at your android claims you'd see how truly flimsy they were. It's no longer shocking how much Apple trolls condemn anyone who spends energy understanding how the iPhone works, Chris. > But you won't, as you're not interested in the truth. Remember you ignore > all the facts about batteries now we have authoritative source data. It's > too easy to correct your lies now. It's no longer shocking how much you *hate* how puny iPhone batteries are. > You're now resorting to spinning your opinions as facts by some > self-bestowed authority no-one believes. It's not shocking that you feel the EU tests are wrong only in the case of your beloved iPhone, Chris - where Apple couldn't earn an A in efficiency. >> The question is and was always what you can do on each platform without >> rooting it. That was the only stricture. > > Only in your head. WTF? The question was stated clearly. You simply *hate* the question. More to the point, you *hate* the answer to the question, Chris. You think I don't know that? > Your hypocrisy around third party accounts is a transparent attempt to prop > up android phones while eroding your precious privacy and security. It's no longer shocking that you have to add a hundred conditions so that your 11-most-beloved iPhone apps stand any chance at all against Android. >> But other than rooting, everything else was fair game. >> >> If you want to play the game of what's native, that's fine; but that's a >> completely different question given the ecosystems are very different. > > It's what really matters. You need to add a hundred mutually incompatible conditions to make your 11-most-beloved iPhone apps stand any chance at all against Android, Chris. You don't think I don't know that nothing works on iOS without an account? If I had added that one condition, the iPhone would lose against a brick. The conditions were fair. No rooting/jailbreaking. That's it. That's fair. >> Might I remind you that almost everything on iOS requires that account. > > It only requires a *single* account which you are fully aware of when > buying into the product. Actually that's wrong, which again shows how little you know about iOS. > With android you are the product and signing up to dozens of accounts just > makes that even worse. That utter fabricated absurd bullshit shows how *desperate* you Apple trolls are to defend Apple's crapware to the death, no matter what. Tell me where these "dozens of accounts" are on my Android phone, Chris. C'mon. Tell me. >> If you want to play the game of what doesn't require an account, that's >> fine > > It was my stipulation. OK. Fair game. You and I cannot use ANY account in any app on the phone. HINT: I already have that. So my phone doesn't change in functionality. How about yours, Chris? > So now find android solutions to core ios functionality. Heh heh heh... you can't install a single app on your iPhone now. Nor can you log into a single app (such as your beloved Messages app). Without accounts, your iPhone loses in functionality against a brick. My phone already doesn't have any accounts on it, Chris. Are you seriously that ignorant of how an iPhone works vs Android? >> but that's a completely different question given everything on iOS >> requires an account (which has been proven many times in other threads). > > It hasn't, but that's a different story. How are you gonna use Messages or Facetime, Chris, without an account? How are you gonna download any software, Chris, without an account? Are you that ignorant about how an iPhone works compared to Android? >>> Pebblebee and Chipolo in >>> fact use the Apple Find My network. They aren't an alternative. >> >> That used to be true, but now both Pebblebee and Chipolo support Google's >> Find My Device network natively. > > The point is they aren't service providers, they are service users. You are so *desperate* to prove that your religious God isn't a dumb brick that the only way you can compare to Android functionality is to add a hundred mutually exclusive app-by-app conditions, which is absurd. You proved my point for me, Chris. There's almost nothing iOS can do that Android doesn't already do, Chris. Now can we get to the rather important ADULT part about teaching you why? >> While iOS integrates it into the >> Phone app, Android matches the functionality and even adds transcription >> and cloud sync via apps like YouMail and Google Voice. > > Android cannot do it for traditional phone service provided via the SIM. > That's the key difference. Again and again you have to foist a hundred mutually exclusive app-specific conditions because you're desperate to defend Apple's flaws to the death. > I can get it for the phone number I've used for 20 years. Every statement from you shows your utter desperation to craft a hundred mutually exclusive app-by-app specific conditions just because you don't want to understand why the iPhone lacks the functionality of Android. > You have to use a separate service which often doesn't exist outside the > US. Google voice, for example, is a very different product outside the US > and isn't available for most countries. I wonder if you realize your *desperation* shows very clearly that you'll craft a hundred mutually-exclusive conditions on an app-by-app basis. > >> But this isn't about which is better. >> It's about what major functionality does iOS have that Android doesn't. > > Correct. And android doesn't. You haven't listed a single functionality that isn't already on Android. You think I didn't know that was going to happen, Chris? Remember, I'm nothing like you Apple trolls. I understand Apple's strategy. >> In fact, those Android tools are far more powerful tools than Apple's >> built-in options, as they have bulk OCR and advanced annotation. > > OCR is built into iOS and runs automatically so you can search for text > found in anything including photos. Again a non-android functionality. I'll > need to add that to the list. Thanks. The fact you have to add specific app-by-app conditions, which are mutually exclusive, proves your *desperation* to avoid accepting the facts, Chris. Once you accept the facts, only then can I begin to teach you the strategy. >> If you remove the need for accounts, almost everything on iOS breaks, as >> you can't even load an app or run your beloved Apple native tools, Chris. > > That's simply a lie you like to perpetuate. I've seen what happens when you don't log into your Apple accounts, Chris. Have you? Never forget. I'm absolutely nothing like you ignorant Apple trolls, Chris. I know what happens when you don't create an Apple account or log into one. You do not have any clue what happens if you don't log into Apple accounts. >> But looking only at the battery, the Pixel 10 Pro XL is 5,200 mAh, but >> that's only 200mAh more than my free 2021 Samsung Galaxy A32-5G phone. > > As we've agreed before capacity is only part of the equation. If you look > at all phones with 5000 +/- 200 mAh (222 models) the endurance difference > is 44 hours! > > Plus we all know the Samsung Galaxy A series are crappy phones as they are > rated at class "C" or "B" and their endurance is amongst the worst within > the class. Heh heh heh... again and again, you show how *desperate* you are to attack my free phone because you *hate* it has more functionality than any iPhone. I'll accept your attack against my <$200 phone as further proof that you *hate* that even a free Android phone bests the iPhone in functionality.
Back to misc.phone.mobile.iphone | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 22:30 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2025-08-14 06:53 +0200
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-14 05:55 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 16:50 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-14 10:38 -0700
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-14 18:03 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 11:58 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-19 14:26 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 07:10 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-20 16:57 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 21:17 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-21 00:11 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 07:14 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 21:30 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-22 02:03 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 11:56 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 01:22 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 16:22 -0700
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-24 01:31 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-24 17:14 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-25 01:26 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-25 14:41 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-08-26 10:00 +1200
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-26 03:06 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 16:26 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-27 00:48 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 16:43 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-28 03:13 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-28 19:23 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-28 23:48 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-29 15:28 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-30 22:22 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-08-31 16:59 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-31 18:32 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-09-02 12:32 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-02 22:03 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-02 22:50 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-03 15:28 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-03 17:11 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-08 18:55 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-09-09 00:13 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-09-10 15:58 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-27 15:38 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-08-27 21:16 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-28 03:24 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 19:17 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-26 01:57 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-26 09:19 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-26 09:23 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2025-08-27 08:40 +1200
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-08-28 03:42 +0000
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-28 16:17 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-08-28 16:19 -0400
Re: The 11 iOS features that Arlen is ignorant of -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-29 10:46 -0400
csiph-web