Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #893966

OK, .. Let's See :-)

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject OK, .. Let's See :-)
Date 2025-07-15 11:57 -0500
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <105618v$2akve$1@solani.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw




SCO was created for countries who are not on the Nazis' side to discuss 
their issues and find ways to _cooperate_ to solve them. That "C" in the 
middle of the acronym stands for Cooperation.

It is being held in Shanghai right now, and Araghchi is attending to ask 
the big paper tigers why they're so inactive against Nazis and minding 
their own businesses as long as selling and buying stuff to and from 
Nazis and paying not too much tariffs are concerned. This will come up, 
but is not the main reason for his participation of course.

I've done it before here, but even I cannot find it anymore in the sea 
of stuff I'm blogged here. So let me briefly go over a few features of 
SCO once more.

Just like BRICS, I think and believe that, the significance of SCO is 
only in coming together of little countries around the world for such 
discussions, and not in China's and/or Russia's or India's presence 
there. These huge entities feel safe and are greedy enough to keep 
things as it is for little countries while they are profiting from 
Nazis. They're totally useless, to be honest.

Well, the three mentioned nations describe their own disloyalty to SCO 
and fickleness by insisting that one of the foundation principles of SCO 
is "balance", and by that word they mean maintaining relations with 
Nazis. This is their excuse. So they admit what they are, and what 
they're doing is not helping SCO, but have an excuse for it.

Useless. That's what they are.

I say it for the nth time since it got created around the turn of the 
century, that the big guys there are insignificant. The significance of 
SCO is in little countries participating in it ONLY.

These smaller countries are the ones who help each other under SCO's 
principles, and that includes counter-terrorism assistance, regional 
stability, some degree of intelligence sharing, providing economic 
connectivity, and, if you can believe it, _using_ the big fat paper 
tigers in creating a safe zone against Nazis.

THAT's the significance of SCO, not the big fat useless members presence 
in there.

And I repeat (I've said it at least 5 or 6 times before) that SCO does 
not have direct military assistance in its nature. It is no "NATO", so 
to speak.

But it goes a long way just the way it is. And only for the little 
countries in there. For the big fat useless ones it is as good as nothing.

Another unique feature of SCO is that it "leaves no child behind", so to 
speak. In voting for a decision for some directive, even one negative 
vote from any member country will veto that decision and directive. So 
it is no "UN" that's so ridiculously at the disposal of only 5 or 6 
countries in the world.

UN is an abomination against human's dignity. Switzerland, as long as it 
could still maintain a spirit of self-reliance and dignity, avoided 
membership in UN. But by early this century Switzerland had fallen and 
had lost that spirit (read that as: it became Bitch of USA) and joined UN.

So this unique feature in SCO means that the "C", the Cooperation, is 
limited to only what can be done for every and all member's benefit. It 
does not sacrifice some to benefit others. It is no UN, so to speak.


A lot is included in what I described in SCO. A lot can be done, and is 
being done! But again, almost entirely by the little member nations. 
Just to give instances of that, look at:

- trading oil and gas
- sharing and creating markets (e.g. Central Asia, Silk Road, ..)
- providing bank services
- exchanges in science
- exchanges in education
- exchanges in tourism
- networking the member countries' universities
- ...


Even in Shah's time, some degree of cooperation between Iran and other 
little countries were ongoing, cause it just made a lot of sense. I 
still remember the absolute best teacher of Persian grammar we had in 
our top high school. He was a very well-dressed, very quiet, tall, and 
dark-skinned Pakestani :-)

We _learned_ our own language's grammar perfectly well only because of 
that Pakestani guy (and a superb text by a team of famous Iranian 
Persian experts). He had some accent, and he pronounced some words in 
its correct Persian form (and not in the strange Tehrani way of saying 
them) but knew the subject like nobody I've seen after. Persian has 
amazingly deep features that can be used to describe anything that needs 
description very closely and accurately. We Iranians do not take this 
feature for granted. That's why Iran is so advanced in quality 
literature. World-class, really.

Result? In the university entrance exams held in 1972, some 5 years 
later, I could still score 100/100 in its definitive Persian language 
test. "The hardest test" among all other tests in those exams. I was one 
in five persons only, in those who ended up in Tehran University, who 
got 100% of the subtle and difficult questions correctly!.. (in Physics 
test of it I got the 4th place in those who got into Tehran University - 
not nationally). And I owe my score in Persian to nobody but that 
Pakestani teacher.

He (unfortunately I have forgotten his name) was part of an educational 
exchange program with Pakestan in 1960s :-)

Pakestanis love Iran, mainly because they understand Persian and have 
the exact same history that they share, and they can appreciate good 
Persian literature. Pakestan _was_ Iran till 1872, when the British took 
her away from Iran.

So SCO is effective, believe me. But really only to little nations. The 
big ones don't need anything at all. If they say otherwise, they're 
speaking out of their asses. They're fine as things are today and their 
heads are indeed up their own asses.





Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OK, .. Let's See :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 11:57 -0500
  Re: OK, .. Let's See :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 21:00 -0500
    Re: OK, .. Let's See :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 22:57 -0500

csiph-web