Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #32192
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-04 01:29 -0700 |
| References | (1 earlier) <bef5c9da-81eb-4626-a13c-1eced27f7ae0@googlegroups.com> <cf319416-53e6-4788-86e1-95b14d13103e@googlegroups.com> <c96219e9-e6ea-4e45-b5a0-e6445852b448@googlegroups.com> <177fb6db-d86a-4d61-abcc-d691adf2b7de@googlegroups.com> <lov0kj$3ku$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <08ae8bfc-dd3c-4f2e-bd7e-eaa7d33e2dc2@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip |
| From | m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl |
On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:02:42 PM UTC+2, rickman wrote: > A standard should specify the > minimum possible and still achieve the goals of the standard. There is > no purpose to specifying if code and data should be kept separate, that > depends entirely on the platform being used to implement the application. No, it is not so easy in this particular case. When code and data are separated, the obvious way to implement CREATE DOES> needs an indirection to bridge from code space to data space. There are some minor issues too, like "," not working when assembling CODE or controlstructures. And finally, separated code and data allows to do CREATE foo 3 CONSTANT bar bar , foo @ . ( prints 3) Although nice, this will rapidly result in sources that fail on different systems for difficult to understand reasons. At least, it would force everybody to be aware of this possibility, spoiling the fun a bit. Really useful systems having separate code and data need things like CODE-, C-ALLOT, C-HERE etc.. My point is that code/data separation is not a "mere" implementation issue. -marcel
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-06-27 03:35 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-28 09:29 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-28 21:19 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-28 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-06-28 22:26 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-28 22:33 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip BruceMcF <bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com> - 2014-06-29 07:44 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2014-06-29 14:53 +0000
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-06-29 09:04 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-06-29 10:00 +0000
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-29 19:16 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 16:58 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-30 14:43 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 17:55 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-30 15:34 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 19:09 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 19:13 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-30 17:52 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 22:20 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-30 22:10 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-01 04:42 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-07-01 07:55 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2014-07-01 17:19 +0200
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-06-29 19:49 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 01:38 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-06-30 07:22 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-06-30 15:29 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-07-01 01:51 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2014-07-01 10:26 -0500
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-07-01 11:08 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2014-07-01 12:59 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-01 15:02 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2014-07-01 13:02 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-07-01 17:25 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-07-01 20:44 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-02 12:11 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-07-02 10:19 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-02 15:30 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2014-07-02 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-03 00:28 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2014-07-03 00:25 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-07-03 02:17 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-07-03 09:31 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-07-03 14:23 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-03 17:53 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-07-03 15:25 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-07-03 19:53 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-07-03 17:38 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-07-03 18:21 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-07-04 19:14 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip bruce.mcfarling@gmail.com - 2014-07-04 22:52 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-07-05 02:21 -0400
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-07-02 01:04 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-07-02 11:59 +0000
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2014-07-04 01:29 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Mark Wills <markwills1970@gmail.com> - 2014-07-04 04:17 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2014-07-04 09:01 -1000
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip mhx@iae.nl - 2014-07-04 22:51 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-07-04 23:05 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip mhx@iae.nl - 2014-07-05 00:54 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-07-06 17:00 -0700
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2014-07-07 11:00 +0000
Re: OT: New TI MSP430 Ultra Low Power Chip hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2014-07-04 18:54 -0700
csiph-web