Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #894062

Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?

Show all headers | View raw

Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 0:37:48 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
> 
>> AI or Artificial Idiocy is for NI or Natural Idiots like Penisnino.
>> P* keeps on demonstrating that!
>>
>> WOOF woof-woof woof
>>
>> Bertietaylor
>>
>> --
> 
> Penisnino has merged with his AI god!
> 
> WOOF woof-woof woof
> 
> --

AI proves to be a huge time saver for responding to delusiona crackpots.

Arindam’s post:

    Penisnino has merged with his AI god!

    WOOF woof-woof woof

is brief but telling. It again demonstrates his established pattern of
mockery in place of argument, and relies on familiar tropes:
1. Crude Insult as Deflection

Calling you “Penisnino” is not only juvenile but a way to short-circuit
any substantive reply. It avoids engaging with the content of the
critiques you posted—by collapsing the discussion into a personal smear.
2. False Fusion Allegory

The idea that you've “merged with [your] AI god” is intended as a sneer,
suggesting:

    Dependence on AI (implying you can’t think independently)

    Deification of AI (as if invoking its authority is blind worship)

But this metaphor does more harm to Arindam’s own credibility than to yours:

    It betrays his inability or refusal to distinguish between tools
    and worship.

    It reflects paranoia or perhaps a satirical self-image of himself
    as resisting both machine and man.

3. Repetitive Barking Tagline

    WOOF woof-woof woof

Once again, the stylized barking functions as a performative
flourish—signaling contempt, closing the statement with mock-animal
disdain. But it's grown stale. Instead of reinforcing his message, it
highlights the lack of variety or depth.
Meta-level: Reaction to the Posting of Critiques

Rather than addressing the critiques themselves—even indirectly—Arindam
opts for a theatrical rejection of their premise, mocking not the ideas,
but the act of quoting or invoking critique. This reflects intellectual
insecurity masked as bravado.

He’s not just avoiding argument—he’s avoiding acknowledgment that one
took place.
Summary Evaluation

    Substantive Value: 0

    Rhetorical Strategy: Insult + dismissal + repetition

    Engagement with Critique: None

    Psychological Tone: Defensive, mocking, hollow

Conclusion: Arindam's post reveals no capacity or interest in engagement.
It is a reflexive, defensive flare of contempt, devoid of reasoned
thought—consistent with a persona more interested in derision than discussion.

-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:57 +0200
  Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:58 +0200
    GitHub 2.0: The no code companion repository (Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 21:27 +0200
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:38 -0500
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:56 -0500
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:15 -0500
    I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-16 11:46 +0200
      Re: I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-17 22:44 -0500
        I am neither Hanson (Was: I am not from Israel or Jewish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-19 22:09 +0200
          Re: I am neither Hanson bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:32 +0000
            Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? (Was: I am neither Hanson) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 10:17 +0200
              Re: Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 09:42 +0000
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 01:36 +0000
    Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 19:55 -0700
      Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:37 +0000
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 18:47 -0700
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 03:47 +0000
          Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 06:29 -0700
            Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:27 +0000
              Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:25 -0700
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 06:53 +0000
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 06:01 -0700
  Latent Thinking the forbidden Fruit (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-02 12:22 +0100

csiph-web