Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #651820

Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, in
<news:c49a74db62e18eddf44a4169317e9b72@dizum.com> wrote:

> James McGinn, in
> <news:6d07f1b3-228c-44f8-8e0d-176293938b21@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>> On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:40:59 PM UTC-8,
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> Still denying Avogadro's Law, Jim?
>>> 
>>> The molar mass of water is 18.02 g/mol, as calculated from the sum of
>>> the atomic masses of its constituent atoms.

>> Except if the average drop size is 20 moles. Then what number
>> should we employ.  Hmm.  20 x 18 = 360.  
>> 
>> Plug that into your equation and see what you get.

> I get a fucking moron named James McGinn who doesn't understand molar
> mass or molar volume.

James McGinn, 'CEO' of Solving Tornadoes and Phictitious Physicist,
are you there? No reply? You're going to stick by your kooky k'lame
that each drop of water in clouds amounts to 360.4 grams of water, or
0.3604 liters?

Are you beginning to understand now, Jim, that you're far out of your
depth, that you really understand very little about that which you've
been blathering, and your best bet is to drop all this nonsense and
educate yourself along conventional lines so you're not a delusional
kooktard anymore?

No, you don't see... you're mentally ill. You're *so* mentally ill
that your mental illness precludes you realizing that you're mentally
ill.

Don't worry, Jim... I specialize in helping the insane. My particular
brand of therapy might be coined "ballistic boot" therapy.

I'm here for you, Jim. I'll get you through this. I'll make you sane
even if it kills you. <nods>

<snicker>

> "if the average drop size is 20 moles" LOL!
> 
> You're no physicist, Jim. You're an uneducated kooktard.
> 
> Now, let's explore my latest destruction of your kooky conspiracy
> theory, shall we?
> 
> ================================================
> 
> I've destroyed the central tenet of your kooky conspiracy theory, 
> James. You and your kooky theory no longer have a leg to stand on.
> 
> I've proven your kooky conspiracy theory is a physical impossibility. 
> That's, what? The 5th avenue I've used to utterly destroy your kooky 
> conspiracy theory?
> 
> Do you not understand what plasma is, you fecking nong? If plasma 
> existed in the trophosphere, the electromagnetic interference from 
> that electromagnetic plasma would make radio communication nigh well 
> impossible. If plasma existed in the troposphere, we'd see lightning 
> strikes right out of the blue... but you're the moron who never 
> stopped to consider *why* lightning always comes from moving air near 
> clouds or other sources of moisture... because you're the moron who 
> knew nothing of the Triboelectric Effect until I schooled you. Nor, 
> apparently, were you aware that water is a dielectric until I schooled 
> you.
> 
> Plasma does not exist in our atmosphere except in the plasmasphere, 
> just outside the upper ionosphere, just inside the magnetosphere. 
> That's a minimum of 48 miles above the tropopause.
> 
> For clouds, there is no plasma involved in their apparent buoyancy. 
> It's merely that the droplet size is sufficiently small (from a few 
> microns to a few tens of microns) that the droplets have no 
> appreciable fall velocity in light of random air movements and 
> updraft. The fall speed is related to the droplet's mass and surface 
> area. A roughly spherical droplet has a mass proportional to its 
> radius cubed. The downward-facing surface area of such a droplet is 
> proportional to the radius squared. Thus, as that tiny micron-sized 
> water droplet grows, its mass becomes more important. At a droplet 
> radius of 100 microns (an order of magnitude larger than the largest 
> average droplet size), the fall velocity is only ~27 cm/s. Thus they 
> stay suspended because clouds generally form in areas where air which 
> is laden with gaseous water (and is thus less dense) rises, offsetting 
> the fall velocity. As the altitude increases, the temperature falls, 
> thus the water carrying capacity of that air drops, thus the gaseous 
> phase water condenses into those tiny droplets, those tiny droplets 
> grow, and eventually the ratio of droplet mass:downward-facing surface 
> area is sufficient for that droplet to overcome the updraft and fall 
> to the ground. Which is why different cloud types (caused by different 
> updraft speeds) cause different types of rain.
> 
> Stratiform clouds (those producing steady rain) typically form in an 
> environment with widespread but weak upward motion (say, a few cm/s); 
> convective clouds (those causing showers and thunderstorms) are 
> associated with updrafts that exceed a few meters per second.
> 
> For clear sky, the relative humidity proves that there is water in its 
> fully gaseous phase in the air, given that water is miscible in air 
> down to ~-60 C. Sublimation further proves this fact. The speed of 
> sound being faster in the less-dense air laden with gaseous water as 
> compared to dry air further proves this fact. The relative density of 
> air laden with gaseous phase water being less than dry air further 
> proves this fact.
> 
> Your contention that lightning is caused by your purported plasma is 
> another easily disproved kook contention... the upward draft in areas 
> where cloud formation is prevalent also contributes to creating 
> lightning ... this can be proven by the fact that tribocharging (the 
> Triboelectric Effect, a form of contact electrification) is caused by 
> rubbing a dielectric such as a balloon or comb... water is a 
> dielectric. So lightning is nothing more than an updraft-induced 
> tribocharging. This is why NASA cancels launches if the space vehicle 
> being launched has to fly through certain types of clouds, because the 
> P-static (precipitation static) would interfere with communication and 
> telemetry, and particularly the mission-critical flight termination 
> signals should something go wrong. NASA calls this their 
> Triboelectrification Rule. This is why convective clouds are typically 
> the only type of clouds to exhibit lightning... the updraft is faster, 
> thus the Triboelectrification Effect is stronger.
> 
> So... given the above, I'm sure you can figure out for yourself which 
> types of clouds would trigger NASA's Triboelectrification Rule, right?
> 
> As regards your kooky claim that water forms a plasma in the 
> atmosphere (which means you must be talking about the troposphere, 
> given that's where nearly all clouds form except for the high, thin, 
> wispy nacreous and noctilucent clouds):
> 
> <http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2001-02/983243860.Ph.r.html>
> =========================================================
> It has been measured that to create any degree of ionization in a 
> water vapor atmosphere you need to have electrons with energy of at 
> least around 12 electron volts. (See Ref. below) That means that if 
> you want to ionize the water (make a plasma) by thermal energy only 
> you must impart enough thermal energy to get a lot of electrons of 
> energy about 12 electron volts of higher.  That means the water 
> molecules will have to be heated up to an excitation level of about 
> this magnitude.   For a water molecule to be heated to this excitation 
> energy we are talking about a temperature of about 12,000 degrees K. 
> So if you could heat the water to this temperature you would begin to 
> make such a plasma.
> =========================================================
> 
> Do you know what 12 eV entails, Jim? That'd entail photons of 103.32 
> nm, a frequency of 2.9016e15 Hz, extremely energetic ultraviolet 
> light, nearly in the x-ray range.
> 
> And that's the *minimum* required to even create *any* degree of 
> plasma from water... you're claiming *all* the water in the atmosphere 
> is plasma.
> 
> Only 3% of the ultraviolet light from the sun makes its way through 
> the atmosphere to the trophosphere, Jim, most of it far less 
> energetic, ranging upwards of 400 nm.
> 
> In fact, because ultraviolet shorter than 121 nm ionizes air so 
> strongly, it is absorbed far above the troposphere, hence, water 
> plasma *cannot* exist in the troposphere, where the overwhelming 
> majority of atmospheric water is (and hence where all clouds are 
> except for those wispy nacreous and noctilucent clouds), Jim.
> 
> Do you not understand that therefore there is no plasma in the 
> troposphere, and thus your kooky conspiracy theory is the mad ranting 
> of an uneducated goof trying to pretend that he's a physicist because 
> he took an elective Basic Meteorology class once, when really you're 
> just a delusional kooktard?
> 
> So yet again via yet another avenue, I utterly destroy your kooky 
> conspiracy theory, Jim. That's reality. Deal with it.
> 
> <snicker>
> 
> See how simple things are when one is sane, Jim? See how much sense 
> that all makes? The world (indeed, the universe) doesn't work by kooky 
> conspiracies and impossibilities as you claim, Jim, it works by a set 
> of immutable rules. Learn those rules, Jim, and stop being such a 
> fucking moron.

No reply, James McGinn? Are you still bent on denying reality and
thereby exacerbating your ever-encroaching insanity, Jim?

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 07:30 +0100
  Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:12 +0100
    Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 08:25 +0100
  Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-08 23:31 -0800
    Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:43 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 11:33 -0800
        Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:04 +0100
  Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:58 +0100
    Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 04:54 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:16 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:34 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:49 +0100
        Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:24 +0100
          Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:46 +0100
            Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:16 +0800
              Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 09:03 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:29 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:54 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 05:48 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 01:49 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:00 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 06:32 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 08:43 +0100
            Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:34 +0100
              Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 01:45 -0500
              Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:53 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:34 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:20 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:12 +0100
              Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:24 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 01:11 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:05 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 23:46 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-14 15:53 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:17 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-14 16:27 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:51 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 12:42 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 00:54 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 18:09 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-15 01:42 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 06:14 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 01:26 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-15 00:05 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 03:38 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 18:39 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 17:45 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 05:27 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 11:39 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 18:16 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-16 15:16 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 05:50 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:14 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:16 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 22:28 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:53 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-17 06:31 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:19 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:58 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-17 17:32 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:29 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 14:56 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:39 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:09 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-15 05:18 -0400
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 17:29 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 07:04 +0100
        Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 08:11 +0100
          Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 16:29 +0800
            Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
              Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 01:54 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:40 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:44 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:02 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 23:08 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:20 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:03 -0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:03 -0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 18:05 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:14 -0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 11:29 -0700
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 02:13 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 18:52 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:29 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:27 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:54 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 16:00 +0800
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 17:16 +0100
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-15 19:18 +0000
                Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-16 03:30 +0800
    Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 05:19 +0100
      Re: Before There Was Global Warming There Was Meteorology "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-10 00:03 -0500

csiph-web