Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154508

Re: HP split into two

From	Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: HP split into two
Date	2015-11-15 07:48 -0500
Organization	Friends of the Galactic Collective
Message-ID	<05dbaf7711057c7-cc09b@gmail.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <alpine.LNX.2.02.1511041832030.14500@darkstar.example.org> <n1ek1t$h24$1@dont-email.me> <n1fdmj$rj2$1@dont-email.me> <84r3k4elcd.fsf@example.com> <QvJ_x.136$eK.40@fx11.iad>

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 02:15:12PM +0000, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> writes:
> >philo <philo@privacy.net> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> He told me that HP once made products that no one else could make...and now
> >> they just make products that no one else wants to bother with.
> >
> >There is the memristor.
> 
> Which has been in the labs for well over a decade without ever
> finding its way out.   Meanwhile, Micron and Intel have demonstrated
> Optane last week at Oracle World, and expect to ship DIMMs[*] 1h2016.
> 
> Non-volatile, 10x denser than DRAM, 1000x faster than NAND flash
> 
> http://www.itworld.com/article/3000877/hardware/intel-offers-more-insight-on-its-3d-memory.html
> 
> [*] Yes, non-volatile main memory.  Back to the core days with instant-on!

Ha!  Don't imagine that poorly written software will not continue to
expand and consume all available resources.



-- 
We all cannot be intelligent, but at least we can all be polite.

Thread

HP split into two jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2015-11-04 23:25 +0000
  Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-04 18:36 -0500
    Re: HP split into two Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-11-04 22:58 -0500
      Re: HP split into two philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2015-11-05 05:16 -0600
        Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:28 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-05 11:44 +0000
            Re: HP split into two David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-05 11:52 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-11-06 09:40 -0800
          Re: HP split into two scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-05 14:15 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Uncle Steve <stevet810@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 07:48 -0500
        Re: HP split into two "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2015-11-05 07:37 -0600
          Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 13:50 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2015-11-05 20:47 -0500
        Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-05 14:08 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-05 13:00 -0500
            Re: HP split into two "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-11-05 18:44 +0000
              Re: HP split into two hankvc@blackhole.lostwells.org (Hank) - 2015-11-08 18:03 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-05 21:16 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 08:02 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 09:20 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2015-11-06 09:53 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 11:58 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2015-11-06 15:19 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 19:30 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-06 15:54 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-06 23:02 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-07 10:35 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-07 13:45 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-07 13:59 +0000
                Re: HP split into two jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-08 13:46 +0000
          Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-05 21:19 +0000
            Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-06 10:16 +0000
              Re: HP split into two Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-11-06 17:22 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 13:01 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:58 -0500
            Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:57 -0500
              Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 00:57 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-11 23:33 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Andrew Swallow <am.swallow@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-12 13:49 +0000
                Re: HP split into two Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-11-12 10:55 -0700
                Re: HP split into two hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2015-11-13 09:45 -0800
                Re: HP split into two Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-13 12:58 -0500
                Re: HP split into two Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2015-11-14 06:20 +0000
        Re: HP split into two Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2015-11-11 12:50 -0500

csiph-web