Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.local.glasgow > #1955

Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Jim GM4DHJ ... <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> wrote in message 
> news:qjem2d$fee$1@dont-email.me...
>> 
>> "mm0fmf" <none@invalid.com> wrote in message 
>> news:qjeku7$8ic$1@dont-email.me...
>>> On 17/08/2019 17:05, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>> In message <g9WdnRql-IlhgMXAnZ2dnUU78XfNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, Peter 
>>>> Able <stuck@home.com> writes
>>>>> On 17/08/2019 15:58, mm0fmf wrote:
>>>>>> I apologise in advance for a serious radio related topic on this group 
>>>>>> but here we go.
>>>>>> Ian, you jokingly mentioned the problem with 70cms was it was 159.3m 
>>>>>> too short and that got me thinking about 160m. I've never had a 160m 
>>>>>> QSO in 29 years of activity. I've never been motivated to try the 
>>>>>> band. So what makes 160m something of interest to you after you've 
>>>>>> been active for 60 years or so?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd guess that for those of us of that age it is the womb where we were 
>>>>> nurtured.,,:). Loran, Portishead, TT11 PAs, HROs
>>>>> 
>>>>> AaaaaH!
>>>>> 
>>>> You've put it better and more succinctly than I could. There was 
>>>> something magic about radio in those days, with a high proportion of 
>>>> newcomers being young, and either making their own gear or using 'war 
>>>> surplus' equipment - often modifying it to improve its performance. The 
>>>> fact that I was able to get an endfed fullwave up (over a river and at 
>>>> around 70' or 80' at the highest point) also helped!
>>> 
>>> Cheers for that Ian and Peter. I expected there to be something like that 
>>> was involved, a soft spot for how things were etc.
>>> 
>>> I did some Googling into top band stuff and found Mike G4KFK's page of 
>>> top band articles which I've been reading. What is obvious looking at 
>>> some of the older valved gear is how delightfully simple and elegant 
>>> AM/CW transmitters can be. It's brought home as my job deals with 
>>> multi-million lines of software, GB of data resulting in multi-billion 
>>> transistor chips. An unforgiving sea of complexity that's difficult to 
>>> get a good overall view of what's happening. Something with a few valves 
>>> appeals even if my chassis work skills are rough.
>>> 
>>> Then there's getting an effective antenna for the band installed into the 
>>> typical UK postage stamp garden.
>>> 
>>> I'll leave this to degenerate now as all things on here always do.
>>> 
>>> 
>> no  no...after you chebs ....
>> 
> something about wearing the wife's panties like the post you just made up on 
> DIY under my "joining the motorway thread" would do nicely ....... 
> 

I don’t know why you don’t just buy a stock of your own ladies underwear,
Jim, rather than keep wearing and shitting your poor wife’s drawers. Have
some consideration, mate, for fuck’s sake. Thanks, Jim. 

-- 
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Back to uk.local.glasgow | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:05 +0000
  Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:20 +0000
    Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:27 +0100
      Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 19:29 +0100
        Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2019-08-19 21:20 +0100
          Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Jim GM4DHJ ..." <kinvig.netta@ntlworld.com> - 2019-08-19 21:27 +0100
      Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Roger Breedle <rb@rmb.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:37 +0100
        Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 18:43 +0000
          Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Jim <jim@jim.jim.jim.invalid> - 2019-08-19 19:54 +0100
          Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 19:35 +0000
        Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.co.uk> - 2019-08-19 20:17 +0100
          Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2019-08-20 07:31 +0100
            Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-20 06:41 +0000
      Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-08-19 20:49 +0100
      Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2019-08-20 11:07 +1000
        Re: Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert! Peeler <trolltrap@valid.invalid> - 2019-08-20 10:30 +0200
  Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Rambo <Rambo@thisaintreal.org> - 2019-08-19 19:55 +0100
    Re: Ping Ian Jackson 160m Stephen Cole <usenet@stephenthomascole.com> - 2019-08-19 19:13 +0000

csiph-web