Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #146140

Re: iMac Refresh

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject Re: iMac Refresh
Date 7 Aug 2020 19:35:10 GMT
Lines 74
Message-ID <hp5ondF7uljU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <rgg775$i4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <060820200830585327%nospam@nospam.invalid> <rgh5dk$c72$1@dont-email.me> <060820201253373843%nospam@nospam.invalid> <hp2sq4FjvsrU5@mid.individual.net> <070820200905264417%nospam@nospam.invalid> <hp55g1F3s4pU1@mid.individual.net> <070820201520054296%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net xHRDou5vS2gfvWDfGThprw1uZUPM+vyCJamOMb1K1Lvg/uK7AN
Cancel-Lock sha1:/olhSv9Mfax0JtL6QJm1nUXJnw4= sha1:62xROfD9Bfb6sCclDP54oJxFO1E=
User-Agent NewsTap/5.4.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Xref csiph.com uk.comp.sys.mac:146140

Show key headers only | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> In article <hp2sq4FjvsrU5@mid.individual.net>, Snit
>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> My guess is the apple silicon macs will start with something like the 
>>>>> Macbook and the Mac Mini as these will require the least difference 
>>>>> from the iPad chip designs already in hand, 
>>>> 
>>>> two totally different designs.
>>> 
>>> What made you think he suggested otherwise? 
> 
> You gave no support for your view. You made up the claim he tried to equate
> the two designs. 
> 
>> literacy.
>> 
>>>>> and the higher performance 
>>>>> MBP and iMac designs will take longer to bring out, 
>>>> 
>>>> the latest iphone and ipad pro already benchmarks better than the
>>>> macbook pro.
>>> 
>>> What made you think he suggested otherwise? 
> 
> Again no support from you. You made up the claim he said otherwise. 
> 
>> literacy.
>> 
>>>>> and I suspect users 
>>>>> at that market segment are more likely to have need of x86 software 
>>>>> that will take longer to port, and will be less interested in relying 
>>>>> on Rosetta. 
>>>> 
>>>> almost certainly not an issue for nearly everyone.
>>> 
>>> Elsewhere you tried to sell me on the importance of running Windows. 
>> 
>> no i didn't. 
> 
> Direct lie on your part. 
> 
>> i explained what needs to happen so that windows can run on apple
>> silicon, not whether or not it's important.
> 
> I never asked what was needed nor suggested I did not know. 
> 
>>>>> I also suspect that people looking to buy the more 
>>>>> expensive hardware are more likely to want to see how the apple silicon 
>>>>> works out in the real world before actually committing big money.
>>>> 
>>>> probably not.
>>> 
>>> Just a guess ‹ but I would say bigger purchases would be more prone to
>>> people wanting to see how well they work.
>> 
>> how well they work will be known within days of their release, if not
>> well before then.
> 
> In many areas. But not for everyone’s specific workflows and skill sets. 
> 
>> also, very few people will want to spend large sums of money on dead
>> end technology that's obsolete before they even buy it.
> 
> There will be some who hold off. Sure. 

Nospam offered nothing but whining and trolling in response. 

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 06:16 +0000
  Re: iMac Refresh bob <email@domain.com> - 2020-08-06 10:29 +0200
    Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 08:42 +0000
  Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-06 08:30 -0400
    Re: iMac Refresh bob <email@domain.com> - 2020-08-06 16:51 +0200
      Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-06 12:53 -0400
        Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-06 17:26 +0000
          Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
            Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 14:06 +0000
              Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
                Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
      Re: iMac Refresh Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2020-08-06 21:11 +0100
        Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
          Re: iMac Refresh Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> - 2020-08-07 23:27 +0100
            Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 19:36 -0400
    Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-06 19:30 +0000
      Re: iMac Refresh Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 08:41 +0000
        Re: iMac Refresh Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@usually.sessile.org> - 2020-08-07 10:03 +0000
          Re: iMac Refresh Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2020-08-07 12:01 +0000
      Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 09:05 -0400
        Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 14:06 +0000
          Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
            Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
        Re: iMac Refresh RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2020-08-07 15:06 +0000
          Re: iMac Refresh nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2020-08-07 15:20 -0400
            Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-07 19:35 +0000
              Re: iMac Refresh Ray <amos-jones@outlook.com> - 2020-08-08 07:25 +0000
                Re: iMac Refresh Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-08-08 08:57 +0000

csiph-web