Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.skeptic > #117529
| From | Dude <punditster@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy, alt.messianic, comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.skeptic |
| Subject | Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives |
| Date | 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1105ejb$2v4tk$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (18 earlier) <1104uu2$2rtpa$1@dont-email.me> <11052e5$2s43l$3@dont-email.me> <11053o0$2svfj$1@dont-email.me> <11054uj$2t6l2$1@dont-email.me> <11055b4$2tatt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 6/7/2026 6:19 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/7/2026 8:12 PM, dart200 wrote: >> On 6/7/26 5:52 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/7/2026 7:29 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>> On 6/7/26 4:30 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/7/2026 5:49 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>> On 6/7/26 12:34 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/7/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/7/26 8:07 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jun 2026 16:44:14 +0200, Moebius >>>>>>>>> <moebius@example.invalid> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 07.06.2026 um 15:23 schrieb dart200: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction >>>>>>>>>>>> job. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ column >>>>>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>>>>> building >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hint: This was not just an ordinary "fire". This has to be >>>>>>>>>> taken in >>>>>>>>>> consideration. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WTC7 involved a fairly normal office fire, unlike WTC1/2 it was >>>>>>>> not hit by a jet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sophisticated Computer-simulations have SHOWN that the course >>>>>>>>>> of events >>>>>>>>>> is totally "plausible" i.e. possible in this case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> uhhh ... no computer simulation has shown how a fairly normal >>>>>>>> office fire can cause near-simultaneous failure across *all* >>>>>>>> structural columns >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> there is an incredibly weak, "official" argument from NIST that: >>>>>>>> - (a) didn't show near-simultaneous failure of all structural >>>>>>>> columns >>>>>>>> - (b) didn't result in a progression that remotely matches the >>>>>>>> videos >>>>>>>> - (c) didn't model column-girder connections correctly >>>>>>>> - (d) didn't model shear studs bolting the girders to the >>>>>>>> floor above >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> they left out details and didn't produce anything that looks >>>>>>>> like the videos. it is incredible how unwilling most people are >>>>>>>> in doing just a modicum of critical thinking, and witnessing it >>>>>>>> really has made me question the nature of human intelligence... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it is worth noting that WTC7 is the *only* example of an type-1 >>>>>>>> fire- safe skyscraper proposed to have collapsed due to fire as >>>>>>>> the primary and sole cause. there are in fact _very_ few >>>>>>>> examples of skyscrapers collapsing at all, let alone fully, let >>>>>>>> alone due to fire, across the entire history of building large >>>>>>>> buildings. which is really quite amazing considering our safety >>>>>>>> standards in building these things even penetrates the 3rd world >>>>>>>> quite well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The alternative back in Sept 2011 that the US >>>>>>> government would murder thousands of US citizens >>>>>>> for political advantage is (at that time) too >>>>>>> unreasonably implausible. >>>>>> >>>>>> it was zionists in the US govt, not the US govt overall >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I personally know a guy that honestly believes that the >>>>> airplanes that crashed into the twin towers never existed >>>>> and were planted in the minds of witnesses through CIA mind >>>>> control devices. What about the video tapes? What about >>>>> the airplane wreckage? >>>>> >>>>> It is possible that a giant purple space alien that >>>>> is living inside the hollow Moon did it. It is not >>>>> reasonable plausible. >>>>> >>>> >>>> this is called a nut-picking fallacy, in an attempt to form a guilt- >>>> by- association fallacy, which falls under the larger umbrella of >>>> red herrings, >>>> >>>> i assure you that nothing about 9/11 truth breaks known laws of >>>> conventional physics, >>>> >>>> and rather unexplained physics is a contention i have with the >>>> official narrative >>>> >>> >>> Believing that it is an inside job ignores the airplanes. >>> Believing that the airplanes never existed resolves this. >>> >> >> WTC1 and WTC2 were hit by airplanes, but getting hit by airplanes does >> _not_ contradict the subsequent demolitions... >> >> WTC7, a 47 story skyscraper, was not even hit by an airplane, yet it >> was _also_ demolitioned, to collapse at free fall into it's footprint > > Believing that the whole thing was an inside job > is totally nuts, are you totally nuts? > Totally nits!
Back to sci.skeptic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 10:37 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2026-06-07 19:55 +0200
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 11:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 14:34 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:01 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 16:20 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 17:37 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 15:49 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 18:30 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 17:29 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 19:52 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 18:12 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:19 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-07 23:06 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:23 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:29 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:35 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 22:58 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 23:07 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 00:13 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-12 18:01 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 08:10 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Noah Sombrero <fedora@fea.st> - 2026-06-08 09:52 -0400
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 09:27 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:02 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:22 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 09:31 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:46 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 11:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:51 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 14:22 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 16:44 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 17:08 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-09 19:24 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-09 20:27 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 16:58 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 20:45 -0500
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-08 20:43 -0700
Nick's WTC Jewish Conspiracy Theory Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-10 16:28 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-08 11:51 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? dart200 <user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-06-07 20:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is incredibly bs isn't it? Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 21:16 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:57 -0700
Re: the official 911 narrative is kinda bs isn't it? --- Alternatives Dude <punditster@gmail.com> - 2026-06-07 20:55 -0700
csiph-web