Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #686921 > unrolled thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Started byJeff-Relf.Me @.
First post2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
Last post2018-05-31 21:34 +0000
Articles 14 on this page of 94 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
      Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
          Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
        Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                  They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]


#687732 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<bah84u.dls.17.14@news.alt.net>
In reply to#687731
On 2018-05-29 11:40 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>> Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
>>> Idiocy.
>>
>> You're just afraid of the truth, man!   :-D
> 
> The way those guys talk tells us more about them than anything about the way
> the world is.
> 
> The world is a complex, imponderable thing, full of conflict and conflicting
> ideas, each arbitrary group of a people itself a complex mix of the dumb and
> the genius, the angry and the happy, the bitter and the sweet.  Those who
> attach a broad label to anyone are likely to be simply, bigots.
> 
> Use your brains, people!
> 
your world might be like that mine is nothing like that

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687800 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<pem94e$nv5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687732
% wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2018-05-29 11:40 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> benj wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, talking to you and Dooms is a waste of time.  "Lib this", "lib that".
>>>> Idiocy.
>>>
>>> You're just afraid of the truth, man!   :-D
>> 
>> The way those guys talk tells us more about them than anything about the way
>> the world is.
>> 
>> The world is a complex, imponderable thing, full of conflict and conflicting
>> ideas, each arbitrary group of a people itself a complex mix of the dumb and
>> the genius, the angry and the happy, the bitter and the sweet.  Those who
>> attach a broad label to anyone are likely to be simply, bigots.
>> 
>> Use your brains, people!
>> 
> your world might be like that mine is nothing like that

Thanks for admitting that.

-- 
Q:	What's tiny and yellow and very, very, dangerous?
A:	A canary with the super-user password.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687798 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<rs6tgdd0m46rp5fe6q3ivfl5dej2cjpl0o@4ax.com>
In reply to#687731
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>The way those guys talk tells us more about them than anything about the way
>the world is.

It's people like them, extremists, that make the world the fscked-up
place that it is.

Reading the vile spew that was posted from the likes of "DFS",
"Hadron", and "Flatfish", it's no leap at all, for me, to understand
how groups like the Taliban and ISIS can get started.  

Those fsckers were some truly evil, disgusting people, and they
enjoyed it!  I have no doubt, personally, that, if they thought that
they could get away with it, they would do violence against those that
they attacked verbally.

>The world is a complex, imponderable thing, full of conflict and conflicting
>ideas, each arbitrary group of a people itself a complex mix of the dumb and
>the genius, the angry and the happy, the bitter and the sweet.  Those who
>attach a broad label to anyone are likely to be simply, bigots.
>
>Use your brains, people!

They use them, to *lie* their asses off, while accusing the *other*
side of being the liars.  Just like the Linux-haters.

-- 
"I understand the truth about cola liars sounds offensive, but how
else should you wackjobs be labeled but idiots, wackjobs and lying
morons?  You're not at all honest or consistent or ethical.  You
deserve the treatment you get."  -  DumFSck

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687799 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<baisp3.3fc.17.11@news.alt.net>
In reply to#687798
On 2018-05-30 2:57 PM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> The way those guys talk tells us more about them than anything about the way
>> the world is.
> 
> It's people like them, extremists, that make the world the fscked-up
> place that it is.
> 
> Reading the vile spew that was posted from the likes of "DFS",
> "Hadron", and "Flatfish", it's no leap at all, for me, to understand
> how groups like the Taliban and ISIS can get started.
> 
> Those fsckers were some truly evil, disgusting people, and they
> enjoyed it!  I have no doubt, personally, that, if they thought that
> they could get away with it, they would do violence against those that
> they attacked verbally.
> 
>> The world is a complex, imponderable thing, full of conflict and conflicting
>> ideas, each arbitrary group of a people itself a complex mix of the dumb and
>> the genius, the angry and the happy, the bitter and the sweet.  Those who
>> attach a broad label to anyone are likely to be simply, bigots.
>>
>> Use your brains, people!
> 
> They use them, to *lie* their asses off, while accusing the *other*
> side of being the liars.  Just like the Linux-haters.
> 
everybody knows what they do already

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687627 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<vchqgd59hp8sgd88pb3iut1crkrohgum3h@4ax.com>
In reply to#687325
Doomsdrzej wrote:

>I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up. 

You were asking for an example of your extremist thinking, right?

-- 
"heh!  In 1988 my car was broken into and cheap stereo was stolen.
The jigaboo who did it shed a filthy nappy hair or two, which I
spotted.  I made a police report and the White cop who responded wrote
'nappy hair' in the report and told me he once 'drew down on a nigger'
[exact quote] (draw down means point gun at).  Great cop!"  -  "DFS"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687648 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
SubjectRe: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Message-ID<fn5832F432oU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#687627
On 5/29/18 5:23 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Doomsdrzej wrote:
> 
>> I used to think differently, but the worst things to happen to
>> democracy are the decisions to give people who didn't own land the
>> right to vote and later women. Land owners SHOULD have a say in who
>> runs a place whether they own 2 square feet or 200,000 but if people
>> are on welfare, renting or doing nothing of worth, they shouldn't have
>> a say. If the land owner is a woman, she should have a vote too
>> because she has a lot to lose from incompetence but a woman who stays
>> at home and "takes care" of her nine children from seven different
>> fathers on the taxpayer's dime should sit down and shut the Hell up.
> 
> You were asking for an example of your extremist thinking, right?
> 
LOL! Slimer will claim to not see it.

And right wingers such as Carroll will not condemn it.

These things are 100% predictable.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687355 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

FromSer Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven>
Date2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
SubjectRe: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
Message-ID<905jgdtduv6ajmj4lsatvd0dqi9gq1s5k7@4ax.com>
In reply to#687184
On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:43:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>Keep in mind most of America backs much of the liberal platform. They 
>want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want to push 
>toward greener energy, they want a living wage, they want health care 
>for all, etc.

Yes, it is clear they WANT all of that. Their being liberal,
though, the trouble is they want it all handed to them on 
a silver platter while they slack off and do little more than
flap their jumbo lips.

-- 

The Mountain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687359 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
SubjectRe: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
Message-ID<fn05hmF59jjU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#687355
On 5/27/18 9:36 AM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:43:50 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> Keep in mind most of America backs much of the liberal platform. They
>> want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want to push
>> toward greener energy, they want a living wage, they want health care
>> for all, etc.
> 
> Yes, it is clear they WANT all of that. Their being liberal,
> though, the trouble is they want it all handed to them on
> a silver platter while they slack off and do little more than
> flap their jumbo lips.

Who does?



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687179

FromDoomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s>
Date2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
Message-ID<5dvigd9tu2ah4gsrurqsr42ir7boft2hac@4ax.com>
In reply to#687104
On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:

>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>> 
>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>
>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>
>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>
>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>> 
>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>> 
>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
>Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
>party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
>that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
>our own eyes.

It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.

It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who
want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar
people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no
benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in
a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it -
decide to blame whitey.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687185

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Message-ID<fmtdntFjvnhU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#687179
On 5/26/18 8:35 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>
>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>
>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>
>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>
>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>
>> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been
>> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and
>> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African
>> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days.
>> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black
>> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the
>> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think
>> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with
>> our own eyes.
> 
> It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
> complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.
> 
> It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
> have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
> surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who
> want to live, learn and prosper. 

I sometimes forget how racist you are. Wow. Thanks, I guess, for the 
reminder.

> Once they're surrounded by similar
> people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no
> benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
> communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
> from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
> youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
> the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in
> a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it -
> decide to blame whitey.

At least you do not try to hide your bigotry.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687356

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Message-ID<us5jgdtocint8uuto2pspledevf3tr5vn2@4ax.com>
In reply to#687179
On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>
>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>
>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>
>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>> 
>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>> 
>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
>>Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
>>party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
>>that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
>>our own eyes.
>
>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.
>
>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who
>want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar
>people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no
>benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in
>a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it -
>decide to blame whitey.

19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of
   inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter,
   a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith
   in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but
   he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong,
   and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant
   behavior.

[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings
   of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as
   individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the
   leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization
   or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
   
   20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists
   protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke
   police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be
   effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but
   because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist
   trait.
   
   21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
   or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the
   leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle
   cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too
   prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.
   Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of
   benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help.
   For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black
   people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or
   dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a
   diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal
   and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative
   action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take
   such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs.
 
(Source:  well.sf.ca.us )


-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687364

FromDoomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s>
Date2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
Message-ID<p3slgdhi960gqel66m2nlftuvds2a1l49j@4ax.com>
In reply to#687356
On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:

>On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>>
>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>>
>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>>
>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>> 
>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>> 
>>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
>>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
>>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
>>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
>>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
>>>Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
>>>party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
>>>that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
>>>our own eyes.
>>
>>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
>>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.
>>
>>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
>>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
>>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who
>>want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar
>>people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no
>>benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
>>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
>>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
>>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
>>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in
>>a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it -
>>decide to blame whitey.
>
>19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of
>   inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter,
>   a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith
>   in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but
>   he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong,
>   and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant
>   behavior.
>
>[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings
>   of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as
>   individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the
>   leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization
>   or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
>   
>   20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists
>   protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke
>   police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be
>   effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but
>   because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist
>   trait.
>   
>   21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
>   or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the
>   leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle
>   cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too
>   prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.
>   Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of
>   benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help.
>   For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black
>   people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or
>   dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a
>   diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal
>   and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative
>   action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take
>   such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs.
> 
>(Source:  well.sf.ca.us )

All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser,
failed 4th grade  science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his
head through a noose. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687366

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
Message-ID<fn0a4kF67okU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#687364
On 5/27/18 10:54 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
> <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>>>
>>>> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been
>>>> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and
>>>> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African
>>>> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days.
>>>> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black
>>>> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the
>>>> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think
>>>> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with
>>>> our own eyes.
>>>
>>> It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
>>> complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.
>>>
>>> It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
>>> have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
>>> surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who
>>> want to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar
>>> people, they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no
>>> benefit whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
>>> communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
>> >from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
>>> youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
>>> the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in
>>> a sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it -
>>> decide to blame whitey.
>>
>> 19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of
>>    inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a self-promoter,
>>    a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith
>>    in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, but
>>    he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be strong,
>>    and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant
>>    behavior.
>>
>> [1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings
>>    of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as
>>    individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the
>>    leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization
>>    or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
>>    
>>    20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists
>>    protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally provoke
>>    police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often be
>>    effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but
>>    because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist
>>    trait.
>>    
>>    21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
>>    or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the
>>    leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle
>>    cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too
>>    prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power.
>>    Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of
>>    benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help.
>>    For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black
>>    people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or
>>    dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a
>>    diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal
>>    and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative
>>    action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take
>>    such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs.
>>
>> (Source:  well.sf.ca.us )
> 
> All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser,
> failed 4th grade  science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his
> head through a noose.
> 
I hope some day you get past your deep insecurities. Wow.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#688014

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2018-05-31 21:34 +0000
Message-ID<fnb82dF82riU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#687364
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:54:02 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
> <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @.
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic that's
>>>>>> easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and
>>>>>> unfortunate.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>>> 
>>>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been
>>>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and
>>>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African
>>>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days.
>>>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare
>>>>Black Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting
>>>>against the party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow.
>>>>You'd think that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen
>>>>it working with our own eyes.
>>>
>>>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of
>>>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour.
>>>
>>>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met
>>>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't
>>>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who want
>>>to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar people,
>>>they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no benefit
>>>whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their
>>>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest
>>>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the
>>>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making
>>>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in a
>>>sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it - decide
>>>to blame whitey.
>>
>>19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of
>>   inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a
>>   self-promoter,
>>   a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith
>>   in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth,
>>   but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be
>>   strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant
>>   behavior.
>>
>>[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings
>>   of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as
>>   individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the
>>   leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization
>>   or a mass movement with which he identifies himself.
>>   
>>   20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists
>>   protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally
>>   provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often
>>   be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but
>>   because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist
>>   trait.
>>   
>>   21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion
>>   or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the
>>   leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral
>>   principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility
>>   is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for
>>   power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated
>>   to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying
>>   to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good
>>   for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in
>>   hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to
>>   take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least
>>   verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that
>>   affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists
>>   do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their
>>   emotional needs.
>> 
>>(Source:  well.sf.ca.us )
> 
> All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser, failed
> 4th grade  science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his head
> through a noose.

So we have Unabomber-lite quoting the Unabomber, and crazed extremists 
agreeing with him.

Why is the USENET so full of wingnut extremists?

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web