Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #452912
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.checkmate |
| Subject | Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. |
| Date | 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fnb82dF82riU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <oinggd1dpvc64gg3t7co90r9spqglepn10@4ax.com> <WJ%NC.120424$wG5.65797@fx02.iad> <5dvigd9tu2ah4gsrurqsr42ir7boft2hac@4ax.com> <us5jgdtocint8uuto2pspledevf3tr5vn2@4ax.com> <p3slgdhi960gqel66m2nlftuvds2a1l49j@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sun, 27 May 2018 13:54:02 -0400, Doomsdrzej wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 12:36:25 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." > <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:35:07 -0400, Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:02:18 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me @. >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. >>>>>> >>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea ) >>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage; >>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic that's >>>>>> easy on the environment, Al Gore style. >>>>>> >>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal; >>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others. >>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger, >>>>>> but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West >>>>>> >>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ? >>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and >>>>>> unfortunate. >>>>> >>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves? >>>>> >>>>As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been >>>>sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and >>>>sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African >>>>badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. >>>>Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare >>>>Black Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting >>>>against the party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. >>>>You'd think that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen >>>>it working with our own eyes. >>> >>>It's amazing how easily they have been able to sell the idea of >>>complete and utter self-destruction to the people of colour. >>> >>>It's shocking to me because some of the nicest people I've ever met >>>have been black. When you're alone with them or when they aren't >>>surrounded by people of the same colour, they are decent folks who want >>>to live, learn and prosper. Once they're surrounded by similar people, >>>they take on this mob mentality and adopt ideas which have no benefit >>>whatsoever to their people at all. The older members of their >>>communities know this very well and often discourage their youngest >>>from being friends exclusively with other people of colour but the >>>youngest ones, arrogant as they are, ignore the advice and keep making >>>the same mistakes. The end result is that they're perpetually left in a >>>sort of vicious circle and - instead of putting an end to it - decide >>>to blame whitey. >> >>19. The leftist is not typically the kind of person whose feelings of >> inferiority make him a braggart, an egotist, a bully, a >> self-promoter, >> a ruthless competitor. This kind of person has not wholly lost faith >> in himself. He has a deficit in his sense of power and self-worth, >> but he can still conceive of himself as having the capacity to be >> strong, and his efforts to make himself strong produce his unpleasant >> behavior. >> >>[1] But the leftist is too far gone for that. His feelings >> of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as >> individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the >> leftist. He can feel strong only as a member of a large organization >> or a mass movement with which he identifies himself. >> >> 20. Notice the masochistic tendency of leftist tactics. Leftists >> protest by lying down in front of vehicles, they intentionally >> provoke police or racists to abuse them, etc. These tactics may often >> be effective, but many leftists use them not as a means to an end but >> because they PREFER masochistic tactics. Self-hatred is a leftist >> trait. >> >> 21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion >> or by moral principle, and moral principle does play a role for the >> leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral >> principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility >> is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for >> power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated >> to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying >> to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good >> for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in >> hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to >> take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least >> verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that >> affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists >> do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their >> emotional needs. >> >>(Source: well.sf.ca.us ) > > All true and hopefully, your post will result in Michael Glasser, failed > 4th grade science experiment of Prescott, Arizona to put his head > through a noose. So we have Unabomber-lite quoting the Unabomber, and crazed extremists agreeing with him. Why is the USENET so full of wingnut extremists? -- -v
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 02:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 05:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 11:00 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:12 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 17:29 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Fuck You Snit <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 17:43 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 18:07 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Snit's family hates him" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 11:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 11:41 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 14:17 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 12:44 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit took things out of COLA and called the cops <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 13:03 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 14:25 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 14:21 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:08 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 20:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 07:03 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 09:08 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 02:14 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 02:51 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:03 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 21:10 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 07:06 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 09:26 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:10 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 07:45 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 20:15 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-05-28 22:21 +0000
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-28 15:31 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-05-28 23:37 +0000
The .0002% is a quick read. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-28 21:51 -0700
Re: The .0002% is a quick read. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 22:21 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 20:02 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-05-29 00:36 +0000
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-28 17:46 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:52 +0000
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-29 07:44 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-29 07:44 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 05:06 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:56 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 05:54 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 06:41 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 08:56 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 09:17 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:39 -0700
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 23:39 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 07:28 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:59 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 21:34 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 23:08 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:07 -0700
Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Snit's family hates him" <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 07:49 -0700
csiph-web