Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #584092 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-09 10:32 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-06-12 00:08 +0000 |
| Articles | 11 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 10:32 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:09 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 15:07 -0500
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 18:39 +0000
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-11 12:38 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:33 +0000
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 13:37 -0700
Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-12 00:08 +0000
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-09 10:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Reason no Nobel for Hawking |
| Message-ID | <7dba22f6-7acf-4613-9d73-eaf2383ba2c0@googlegroups.com> |
He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-09 11:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fb10beb0-bb51-4696-98b0-330abccbf9a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #584092 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 12:32:06 PM UTC-5, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert Same reason they gave Einstein the Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect, not for Relativity. The Nobel Committee doesn't go for science fiction. Not in physics. That comes under Literature.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-09 15:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8P2dnSPLCYjnUcTKnZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #584095 |
On 6/9/16 1:09 PM, Jerry Kraus wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 12:32:06 PM UTC-5, reber g=emc^2 wrote: >> He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert > > Same reason they gave Einstein the Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect, not for Relativity. The Nobel Committee doesn't go for science fiction. Not in physics. That comes under Literature. > Funny how well relativity models the way nature works. In fact, there has never been an observation that contradicts a prediction of relativity. Relativity remains a fruitful tool of physics. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-09 18:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <snpo2d-20m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #584092 |
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of > a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that does not elect the mayor. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 13:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <229853c8-dca1-4b49-896c-5ff868df64a8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #584106 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:46:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of > > a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert > > At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that > does not elect the mayor. > > -- > Jim Pennino Fullerton has a mayor.Its done by 6 people,and I will change that I'm picking up my mayor papers on July 18th.I also will win.Do not jump with out the facks .Why would I say it? I do not lie Not ever. TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 16:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u4mdncVIVuwJscbKnZ2dnUU7-fUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #584249 |
On 6/10/16 3:48 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:46:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: >>> He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of >>> a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert >> >> At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that >> does not elect the mayor. >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Fullerton has a mayor.Its done by 6 people,and I will change that I'm picking up my mayor papers on July 18th.I also will win.Do not jump with out the facks .Why would I say it? I do not lie Not ever. TreBert > I will predict that reber bites the dust on October 7th. RIP reber. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-11 12:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6247372e-6fa5-45ac-952d-1023dcc402fc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #584258 |
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 2:09:42 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 6/10/16 3:48 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:46:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of > >>> a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert > >> > >> At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that > >> does not elect the mayor. > >> > >> -- > >> Jim Pennino > > > > Fullerton has a mayor.Its done by 6 people,and I will change that I'm picking up my mayor papers on July 18th.I also will win.Do not jump with out the facks .Why would I say it? I do not lie Not ever. TreBert > > > > I will predict that reber bites the dust on October 7th. RIP reber. > What are you, a prophet now? Double-A
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-10 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <f9or2d-hd2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #584249 |
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 11:46:08 AM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: >> > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of >> > a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert >> >> At least he never claimed he was going to run for mayor of a city that >> does not elect the mayor. >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > Fullerton has a mayor.Its done by 6 people,and I will change that > I'm picking up my mayor papers on July 18th.I also will win.Do not > jump with out the facks .Why would I say it? I do not lie Not ever. > TreBert Those 6 being the members of the City Council. No individual has the power to change that. There are no papers for running for Mayor of Fullerton as the Mayor is not elected by the public. You can not win an electoral race that does not exist. You say it because you are an old, befuddled fool that should be in a home for geezers. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | omnilobe@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-09 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0e4e2931-b3f1-4b39-9c08-d9fa83ad8fd4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #584092 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 7:32:06 AM UTC-10, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert Hawking is an Old Science expert. He treats relativity like it is not lacking an explanation for G. He puts Newton's Big G in Einsteins generalized description of affects without knowing the cause of gravity. What basic facts in nature make gravity so weak that G = 10^-10 units? S. Hawking has no theory for the cause, only obscure possible affects of gravity. Steve, baby. Study the Gravity Volume Theory. That is the proposed cause of gravity. Your affects papers are redundant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-11 13:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d3d2dd74-b39b-4560-b954-cf878821bc56@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #584092 |
On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:32:06 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote: > He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert Jim I say it like the Fullerton City Clerk gave me her card and pick up the papers so I can run for mayor.Call her or put your $$$$$ where your mouth is.TreBert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-12 00:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <aolu2d-jvb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #584371 |
reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:32:06 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote: >> He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert > > Jim I say it like the Fullerton City Clerk gave me her card and pick > up the papers so I can run for mayor.Call her or put your $$$$$ where > your mouth is.TreBert There are no papers to run for Mayor of Fullerton as it is not an elective office. The lady, a memember of the City Clerk's office, not the City Clerk who you would never get to met, was just humoring the befuddled old man so he would go away without having to call Security to drag him out. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web