Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #584417

Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking

Show all headers | View raw

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:32:06 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> He steals good ideas from others. He claims information comes out of a black hole with no proof etc.TreBert
> 
> Jim I say it like the Fullerton City Clerk gave me her card and pick
> up the papers so I can run for mayor.Call her or put your $$$$$ where
> your mouth is.TreBert

There are no papers to run for Mayor of Fullerton as it is not an elective
office.

The lady, a memember of the City Clerk's office, not the City Clerk who
you would never get to met, was just humoring the befuddled old man so
he would go away without having to call Security to drag him out.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 10:32 -0700
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Jerry Kraus <jkraus1999@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 11:09 -0700
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-09 15:07 -0500
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-09 18:39 +0000
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 13:48 -0700
      Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 16:09 -0500
        Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-11 12:38 -0700
      Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:33 +0000
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-09 11:58 -0700
  Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 13:37 -0700
    Re: Reason no Nobel for Hawking jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-12 00:08 +0000

csiph-web