Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #513795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-08-16 08:35 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 105 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 07:46 +0200
Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 23:00 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 16:26 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:37 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:09 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-16 09:50 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:39 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:47 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:12 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 18:35 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:09 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:46 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 04:19 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:24 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:41 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 20:56 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:43 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:28 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 05:03 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:26 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:20 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 10:28 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:37 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:38 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:41 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-17 08:04 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:26 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:39 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( Checkmated checkmate ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( to Sarah #2 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:35 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:56 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 08:09 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:48 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 17:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:23 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:27 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:45 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE is a complete idiot ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:00 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:10 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-18 14:27 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 18:37 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 10:34 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:35 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:14 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:53 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 17:33 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-20 00:07 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-21 14:15 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 19:55 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:31 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-21 23:51 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( jim + seismographs ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 23:07 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-18 15:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:07 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:55 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:21 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfoolery ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:57 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( TVfolery ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 08:07 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 08:25 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-19 09:46 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 09:15 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:37 +0100
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:42 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:41 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:53 -0500
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 21:17 +0200
yo, dOOds noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 11:41 -0700
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:52 +0000
Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:35 -0500
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 17:59 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <5pseac-3ho.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #515214 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > "Blast?" I doubt that but the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent > with a collapse of a Controlled Demolition so that only leaves a nuke. And > it has to be a buried nuke or it would have taken a lot of Manhattan Island > with it. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 14:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <a2l9tatc8qqh0kl5foahsbr59idr63c1j4@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515214 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:15:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"HVAC" <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:mr1sdl$43b$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 8/19/2015 8:07 AM, Bast wrote:
>>>
>>> You just don't get it do you ?
>>> Religion teaches followers to ignore what as an individual, they think
>>> and
>>> see.
>>> And miracles like 3 towers falling down only on one specific day, and all
>>> the other things written in the holy book, are just to be accepted as
>>> miracles, and NEVER questioned.
>>>
>>> So just send your money to the 9/11 commission, reject your rights, and
>>> they shall save you from the eviillls of the boogie man.
>>> (As puppet mercenaries like Al-quida and ISIS cost the big boys a lot of
>>> money to keep running)
>>
>>
>> Blast agrees with Rocko that the WTCs were nuked.
>
>"Blast?" I doubt that but the remains of the Twin Towers are not consistent
>with a collapse of a Controlled Demolition so that only leaves a nuke.
Since it wasn't a controlled demolition, it could not be
consistent with a collapse of one.
However, it was consistent with an uncontrolled collapse.
> And
>it has to be a buried nuke or it would have taken a lot of Manhattan Island
>with it.
No nukes were used.
>
>As for AE911truth. They stay focused on WTC7 and stay away from the remains
>of the Twin Towers because they can't say why they ended up like that. Or
>this:
>http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
You do realize the picture proves your whole claim wrong, right?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <kt2atatm159vocm9de335grom8dkk1do3f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515200 |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:07:54 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>>> How wonderful it must be to just be able to make all your problems
>>> vanish, just by denying their existence.
>>
>> How nice it must be to just make up shit (Troofer pages) and have
>> gullible idiots (That would be you and the other Troofers) swallow it
>> and have it become a religion.
>>
>>> Hey,....Try and see if that works when it's time to do your income tax.
>>
>> Income tax is a sad reality that I know all too well. Trooferism is
>> bullshit, through and through.
>>
>>>
>>> If it does you can even make a fortune as a TV preacher.
>>
>> Another version of Troofery is any other religion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>You just don't get it do you ?
>Religion teaches followers to ignore what as an individual, they think and
>see.
Your just described your Troofer religion perfectly.
[...]
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 19:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.303ee0741630947598c235@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515200 |
In article <mr1rfk$16b$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <mqvtbo$fo1$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>> > >>>> You really need to learn about underground nukes because even though > >>>> they can get through rock in the process they also compress the rock > >>>> making it harder to blast through it. So what we really have it is > >>>> took the deep underground nukes about 12 seconds to work through > >>>> maybe 50 meters of rock. > >>> > >>> There were no nukes, kook. > >>> > >>> See below for the response to your kookery, kook. > >>> > >>> The facts are some airliners were hijacked. > >>> > >>> Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires > >>> which weakened the central support columns and the buildings > >>> collapesed almost 2 hours later. > >>> > >>> One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of > >>> the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. > >>> > >>> Everything else is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there is missing rubble is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear > >>> devices is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there was an EMP is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not > >>> seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything > >>> to do with what happened is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima > >>> or Nagasaki is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear > >>> is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance > >>> and still be expected to work is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear > >>> bombs is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the > >>> airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That all the video was CGI is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook > >>> babble. > >>> > >>> That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the > >>> windows is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. > >>> > >>> That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion > >>> is kook babble. > >>> > >>> There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to > >>> ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. > >>> > >>> Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. > >>> > >>> When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature > >>> that can be detected anywhere on the planet. > >>> > >>> There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the > >>> collapse of the two towers was detected. > >>> > >>> This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on > >>> 9/11. > >>> > >>> Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. > >>> > >>> > >>> <snip remaining kook babble> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> How wonderful it must be to just be able to make all your problems > >> vanish, just by denying their existence. > > > > How nice it must be to just make up shit (Troofer pages) and have > > gullible idiots (That would be you and the other Troofers) swallow it > > and have it become a religion. > > > >> Hey,....Try and see if that works when it's time to do your income tax. > > > > Income tax is a sad reality that I know all too well. Trooferism is > > bullshit, through and through. > > > >> > >> If it does you can even make a fortune as a TV preacher. > > > > Another version of Troofery is any other religion. > > > > > > > You just don't get it do you ? I do get it, you Troofers are following another false religion. > Religion teaches followers to ignore what as an individual, they think and > see. Exactly. > And miracles like 3 towers falling down only on one specific day, and all > the other things written in the holy book, are just to be accepted as > miracles, and NEVER questioned. You're the ones who think it's a "miracle", with all kinds of magic stuff involved. We sane people understand it's just a logical progression of events. > > So just send your money to the 9/11 commission, reject your rights, and > they shall save you from the eviillls of the boogie man. You're babbling. > (As puppet mercenaries like Al-quida and ISIS cost the big boys a lot of > money to keep running) > Using 911 as an excuse is where the conspiracy is, not the event itself. > > 1st rule of business,.....create a problem that doesn't yet exist,.....then > be the only one to market the solution. You're connecting unconnected things, just like the Bush admin did, except your connection is totally nonsensical, in almost every way. They just blamed Saddam for it and used it as an excuse to attack Iraq.. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 04:06 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <anh8ta5tjemq6ltk5n576sr7s3bisikg5h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #515088 |
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:27:47 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
>How wonderful it must be to just be able to make all your problems vanish,
>just by denying their existence.
Like the Troofers do in regards to the truth about 9/11?
>Hey,....Try and see if that works when it's time to do your income tax.
>
>If it does you can even make a fortune as a TV preacher.
Or a radio preacher.
This is WAAAAAAAY off topic, but if you want to have some fun,
use your favorite search engine and search for "Bob Larson Fan Club."
The information is quite old (close to 10 years old, if not more), but
interesting.
The audio files are no longer hosted, but Ken Smith, the driving
force behind the club, has claimed to still have them, should they
ever become relevant.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 04:16 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <2832f1036e6ebd741751ccd07e07acd7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515055 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:drSdnVMqrqnNx07InZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > >> Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory >> violates the laws of physics: > T<SMACKAKOOK!> Idiotic slopebrowed troglodytes will shut their slackjaws until they can provide proof pertaining to how their kooky conspiracy theory violates several laws of physics, Idiotic Slopebrowed Troglodyte. Kook. LOL >> ====================================================== >> 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of >> collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* > Y<SMACKAKOOK!> Total retards aren't allowed a voice until they describe in clear and cogent terms how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Total Retard. Kook. LOL >> 2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite >> uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one >> sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and >> thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's >> electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been >> sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate >> aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your >> claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for >> dozens of miles radius. > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Brainless drooling low-IQ sub-morons aren't allowed to speak until they provide third-party corroborable and sensible evidence that their kooky conspiracy theory is able to skirt the laws of physics, Brainless Drooling Low-IQ Sub-Moron. Kook. LOL >> 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that >> there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. >> If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have >> shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most >> likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement >> weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type >> of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or >> educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Pathetic blockheaded dimwits will shut their spittle-flecked gobs until they are able to describe in exquisite detail exactly how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Blockheaded Dimwit. Kook. LOL >> 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be >> sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by >> people in the vicinity > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Compulsive liars and feverheaded frothmonkeys will get their traps slapped shut until they can describe how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to skirt several laws of physics, Compulsive Liar and Feverheaded Frothmonkey. Kook. LOL >> , especially with the bombs buried, as you >> k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. > I<SMACKAKOOK!> Mentally languid gullible goobers who believe in utterly impossible scenarios will be continually belittled and laughed at until they are able to provide scientific proof that their kooky conspiracy theory is somehow exempt from the laws of physics, Gullible Goober. Kook. LOL >> 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron >> source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, >> the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, >> include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon >> poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger >> being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start >> any sort of nuclear chain reaction. > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Illucid gits will shut their pieholes or be ridiculed until they can prove how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Illucid Git. Kook. LOL >> 6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* >> *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling >> vertical support column and *NO* EMP: > Th<SMACKAKOOK!> Rejects from a retard factory are directed to sit the fuck down, shut the fuck up and reconcile themselves to the fact that they will be raucously laughed at until they are able to elucidate exactly how their kooky conspiracy theory can violate several laws of physics, Retard Factory Reject. Kook. LOL >> ====================== >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> >> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column >> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No >> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. >> ====================== > T<SMACKAKOOK!> Crackpots are given no platform in the real world. If you wish to promulgate your kooky conspiracy theory, you'll get right on explaining exactly how it is able to violate several laws of physics, Crackpot. Kook. LOL >> 7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going >> to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would >> be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the >> temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? > W<SMACKAKOOK!> Insane cretins will STFU and get used to the idea of being a laughingstock, until they grow the necessary synapses to explain how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Insane Cretin. Kook. LOL >> 8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through >> a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into >> surrounding rock. > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Those idiotic low-IQ morons who belong in rubber rooms will find they don't do well in the real world until they beg, borrow or steal the intellectual capacity to explain how their kooky conspiracy theory can violate several laws of physics, Idiotic Moron. Kook. LOL >> 9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic >> taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite >> uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at >> the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were >> experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. > I<SMACKAKOOK!> Apish dunderheaded dimwits aren't allowed to blather any of their stupidity until they can clearly and cogently explain how it is that their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physic, Dunderheaded Dimwit. Kook. LOL >> 10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to >> service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source >> triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic >> basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at >> 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep > Yo<SMACKAKOOK!> Stupid shits who are just shit-stupid enough to believe every bit of stupid shit they read on the internet will find their stupid shit-spew flushed until they are able to explain using reason and logic how exactly their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Stupid Shit. Kook. LOL >> 11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) >> that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers >> (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked >> off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your >> admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of >> the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" >> (your words)? > I<SMACKAKOOK!> You will shut your fucking gob until you can explain in exquisite scientific detail exactly how your kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, you pathetic braindead moron. Kook. LOL >> 12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic >> signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the >> WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? > It<SMACKAKOOK!> Evasion and backpedaling are not what are called for, you mentally disoriented dimwit. You will clearly and cogently explain using third-party corroborable peer-reviewed scientific evidence exactly how your kooky conspiracy theory can violate several laws of physics, or you will be dismissed, laughed at, belittled and looked down upon as the moron that you are. Kook. LOL >> 13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris >> kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep >> underground, Ko0K? > ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> Mental incompetents are directed to shut their festering spewholes until they are able to intelligently explain how their kooky conspiracy theory is the first in the history of the universe to find a way to skirt the laws of physics, Mental Incompetent. Kook. LOL >> 14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their >> underground installation > On<SMACKAKOOK!> Continuing to spew your broken-record retarded bullshit sans proof will only earn you more ridicule. You will explain exactly how your kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, or you will have no other choice but to shut your stupid fucking gob. Kook. LOL >> ====================================================== >> >> There's now 14 ways > a<SMACKAKOOK!> Dunces who are incapable of explaining how their kooky conspiracy theory can violate several laws of physics will be the target of derisive laughter at their expense, Dunce. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 14 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink disruption seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink disruption (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 satellite uplink disturbances in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the satellite uplink disturbances was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head and doing your very best Rainman imitation. I can twist your brain into a pretzel with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 08:32 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <86GdnfJfG6m8GEnInZ2dnUU7-eudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #515157 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message How am I supposed to see what you are talking about when you delete every part of my post? Have a good day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-19 17:35 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE has to subtract 14 ) |
| Message-ID | <5d9cb6d8355c5f855b5a1d3317d2141c@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #515207 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:86GdnfJfG6m8GEnInZ2dnUU7-eudnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message > > H<SMACKAKOOK!> Evangelical crusaders for sub-moronism are to shut their fat slobbering maws until they can explain in scientific terms with peer-reviewed evidence exactly how their kooky conspiracy theory is able to violate several laws of physics, Sub-Moron. Kook. LOL > H<SMACKAKOOK!> Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 14 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Rocky, your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the video *you* *provided* between the video disturbance due to satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (depending upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission... and since we're talking solid bedrock here, it'd be at the upper end of that scale). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain is now saying there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you know there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble or its vicinity. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" on the video *you* *provided* and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So you've proven by skirting the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality. And the harder you try, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head and doing your very best Rainman imitation. I can twist your brain into a pretzel with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) |
| Message-ID | <s0j9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514667 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > And don't forget anybody who tries to figure out why so much of WTC1, WTC2 > and WTC3 floated away as proven by the photo below could make the exact same > decision that I did. Nothing floated away, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE credentials ) |
| Message-ID | <g4l4tapmep9k54pni3sb352i9gj8canuks@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514667 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:23:28 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com...
>>
>> Get back on your meds.
>
>I've told you before the reason I delete so much of your post is that way I
>don't have to see you playing an Internet Doctor with absolutely no
>credentials.
>
It was just one of your many deceptive claims, of course.
>But this time I did the opposite. I left your prescription in this post so
>now where are your credentials to play a doctor on the Internet?
>
Where do you see a prescription?
>And don't forget anybody who tries to figure out why so much of WTC1, WTC2
>and WTC3 floated away as proven by the photo below could make the exact same
>decision that I did.
>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
Since a very tiny percentage of the pulverized concrete and
drywall floated away, no one could make the decision you did.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 14:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <KuWdnb4qcvBCqk_InZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514659 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:x5SdnQEwSv6zV0zInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message news:2594ceeb5c6753872b71920e296824ce@dizum.com... > >>> The "outside wall" was not load bearing. It was a fascia, nothing >>> more. The outer perimeter of the floor spars were vertically >>> supported via the truss frame. The truss frame was horizontally >>> supported by the floor spars. They were literally glued together >>> through viscoelastic dampers. > >> ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT just like your bullshit about the CGI that flew into >> the >> South Tower. > > No "CGI" "flew into the South Tower". You're just delusional. Get > back on your meds. ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the perimeter walls you run. And before all you did was change the subject to the trusses that go between the central core columns and the perimeter walls. Why can't you face the facts and why can't you talk about deep underground nukes instead of ground level or airborne nukes? If you are not trying to learn anything then I can't help you. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 20:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <bgu9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514792 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the > perimeter walls you run. The outer walls had little to no structural integrity and are there just to hold up the windows and keep the outside air out, kook. <snip kook babble> > Why can't you face the facts and why can't you talk about deep underground > nukes instead of ground level or airborne nukes? Why can't you face these facts, kook? The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 16:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <o4CdnUG6fZnu0k_InZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514830 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bgu9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the >> perimeter walls you run. > > The outer walls had little to no structural integrity and are there just > to hold up the windows and keep the outside air out, kook. And yet there are a lot of sites that say the complete opposite. Plus if that were really true they should have failed on the very first big wind. DUH Truth is that was just a cover story to help conceal the fact the CGIs they used in Nuke York City were as cheap as money could buy and those cheap CGIs couldn't even keep their wings intact as proven by the following: 9/11 PLANE WING DISAPPEARS AS IT HITS TRADE CENTER TOWER! CGI HOLOGRAM? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 23:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <rl5aac-dqo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514840 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:bgu9ac-vs7.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the >>> perimeter walls you run. >> >> The outer walls had little to no structural integrity and are there just >> to hold up the windows and keep the outside air out, kook. > > And yet there are a lot of sites that say the complete opposite. > > Plus if that were really true they should have failed on the very first big > wind. DUH No, kook, the outer walls were designed to keep the outside air out, including wind, kook. They were not designed to keep solid objects much bigger than a bird out, kook. > Truth is that was just a cover story to help conceal the fact the CGIs they > used in Nuke York City were as cheap as money could buy and those cheap CGIs > couldn't even keep their wings intact as proven by the following: There were no CGI's kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every seismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That the exterior walls were anything other than supports for the windows is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. That a shotgun works anything like an underground nuclear explosion is kook babble. There is nothing in an airplane that transmits the flight number to ATC and saying the transponder does that is kook babble. Saying a missile of any kind hit the Pentagon is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <25l4tal17ear17ap7mine2i1s320le1oge@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514792 |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:36:32 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:x5SdnQEwSv6zV0zInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>>> wrote in message news:2594ceeb5c6753872b71920e296824ce@dizum.com...
>>
>>>> The "outside wall" was not load bearing. It was a fascia, nothing
>>>> more. The outer perimeter of the floor spars were vertically
>>>> supported via the truss frame. The truss frame was horizontally
>>>> supported by the floor spars. They were literally glued together
>>>> through viscoelastic dampers.
>>
>>> ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT just like your bullshit about the CGI that flew into
>>> the South Tower.
>>
>> No "CGI" "flew into the South Tower". You're just delusional. Get
>> back on your meds.
>
>ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the
>perimeter walls you run.
>
What does the thickness of the walls have to do with non-existent
CGIs? I don't see the connection.
>And before all you did was change the subject to the trusses that go between
>the central core columns and the perimeter walls.
>
>Why can't you face the facts and why can't you talk about deep underground
>nukes instead of ground level or airborne nukes?
>
There were no underground nukes, deep or shallow.
>If you are not trying to learn anything then I can't help you.
Since you are unable to learn, FNVW has his work cut out for him.
But maybe, just maybe, he'll figure out how to dumb it down to your
level.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 07:22 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <1c0d42b6cb0b1ed6b4df6ee62c32542d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #514856 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> K Wills (Shill #3), in <news:25l4tal17ear17ap7mine2i1s320le1oge@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:36:32 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message news:2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com... >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Rocky, in <news:x5SdnQEwSv6zV0zInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> >>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>>> wrote in message news:2594ceeb5c6753872b71920e296824ce@dizum.com... >>>>> The "outside wall" was not load bearing. It was a fascia, nothing >>>>> more. The outer perimeter of the floor spars were vertically >>>>> supported via the truss frame. The truss frame was horizontally >>>>> supported by the floor spars. They were literally glued together >>>>> through viscoelastic dampers. >>>> ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT just like your bullshit about the CGI that flew into >>>> the South Tower. >>> No "CGI" "flew into the South Tower". You're just delusional. Get >>> back on your meds. >> ROTFLMAO because when I tried to pin you down about the thickness of the >> perimeter walls you run. > What does the thickness of the walls have to do with non-existent > CGIs? I don't see the connection. You'll note he's caught himself in yet another lie. I did provide the thickness of what RockyRetard calls the "perimeter walls", and even included third-party corroborable links to the proof of what I said. Cowardly lying RockyRetard ran away from it: Message-ID: <2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com> ======================================================== ======================================================== The fascia (your "outside wall") was 0.09" thick aluminum, you witless brainless dumbshit. LOL <http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf> "By far the largest source of aluminum at the WTC was the exterior cladding on WTC 1 & 2. In quantitative terms it may be estimated that 2,000,000 kg of anodized 0.09" aluminum sheet was used, in the form of 43,600 panels, to cover the facade of each Twin Tower." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_World_Trade_Center#cite_ref-NIST-chapter1_48-0> "Karl Koch was also hired to do all the work of erecting the steel, and a contract for work on the aluminum facade was awarded to the Aluminum Company of America.[81]" "Yamasaki's design called for the building facades to be sheathed in aluminum-alloy.[38]" The sources: [38] Huxtable, Ada Louise (May 29, 1966). "Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Buildings". The New York Times. [81] "Contracts Totaling $74,079,000 Awarded for the Trade Center". The New York Times. January 24, 1967. Conversely, the aircraft skin varies from 0.015 to 0.025 inches thick. I know, it seems impossible that a plane with a thinner metal could go through a thicker metal, but consider the momentum involved in traveling at 494 MPH and 586 MPH. As a practical example, a ping-pong ball, as thin as it is, could *never* go through the thick, multi-layered plywood of a ping-pong paddle, right? It'd just crush up and bounce off, right? <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pU7StKm8t9E> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLHQmkfAM54> Kook. LOL ======================================================== ======================================================== I never knew tanks only had 0.09" aluminum shells. It must suck to get hit with an artillery shell in one of those things... oh, wait, RockyRetard k'laming the WTC twin towers had metal as thick as a tank was just more of his delusional lying blather. LOL Now, given that Rocky is anxiously reading each and every post and tallying the ass-kickings he's receiving, here's his for this post: Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 14 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-18 07:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE avoided the Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <32f5def5f01289784d2ad35274fe8216@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #514792 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky, in <news:KuWdnb4qcvBCqk_InZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> > wrote in message news:2ab97d1a644b7e567ade2398186499bb@dizum.com... >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Rocky, in <news:x5SdnQEwSv6zV0zInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> >> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >>> wrote in message news:2594ceeb5c6753872b71920e296824ce@dizum.com... >>>> The "outside wall" was not load bearing. It was a fascia, nothing >>>> more. The outer perimeter of the floor spars were vertically >>>> supported via the truss frame. The truss frame was horizontally >>>> supported by the floor spars. They were literally glued together >>>> through viscoelastic dampers. >>> ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT just like your bullshit about the CGI that flew into >>> the South Tower. >> No "CGI" "flew into the South Tower". You're just delusional. Get >> back on your meds. > RO<SMACKAKOOK!> Idiotic mouthbreathers are directed to keep their toothless mouths shut until they come up with explanations as to how their kooky conspiracy theory gets around violating several laws of physics, Idiotic Mouthbreather. Kook. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 14 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The EMP pulse wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was most likely the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. You didn't specify what type of radiation was experienced, and I doubt you're smart or educated enough to even know what types of radiation there are. 4) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 5) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 6) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 7) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 8) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 9) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 satellite uplink disruptions in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 10) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire base at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 11) You admitted (ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 12) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 13) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 14) Explain how these 19 nukes could tunnel holes from their underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). ====================================================== There's now 14 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- Kadaitcha Man (aka HalfADickRick Mather) is an AUK veteran from way back. He was actually stupid enough to try to hook up with that AUK pass-around girl Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries (aka Rhonda Russo), but ended up booting her to the curb because she's just a cunt hair away from being that nucking futs cat lady dragging a folding cart filled with recyclables so she can afford to buy cat food for herself and her dozen cats. He dodged a bullet, given that she now looks like a reject from a zombie slasher flick, has cancer, hypothyroidism, bulging neck goiters, rotting gums, missing teeth, thinning hair, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism and is just plumb nutz. HalfADickRick lost his better half in a motorcycle accident, so even if he had hooked up with Rhondumb, he'd have to get a surrogate to bed her. He's got growling menacingly down to a science, but toothless old dogs have had plenty of time to practice. He has first-hand experience with gaiety, given that his oldest son wasn't raised right and turned out to be light in the loafers... which limits HalfADickRick's trolling abilities and precludes him laughing at the sissies. So he lost half his dick *and* now has no balls for trolling. "Big things are made out of little things." HalfADickRick Mather's Grand Unified Theory of the Universe. Message-ID: <d7419da693ffc53a544d5e1569ac9bfc@dizum.com> "all matter appeared simultaneously in all places at once (i.e. everywhere at the same time)" Delusional fuckwit HalfADickRick denying nucleosynthesis, nuclear transmutation, universal expansion, hydrogen consisting of most universal mass, cosmic background radiation, 21 cm radiation, the very means by which matter came to be formed from energy after the big bang, and most importantly, reality. Message-ID: <9eb660cc06ece30da6a8e7a947a65dfb@dizum.com> HalfADickRick believes these two statements mean the same thing... he's too stupid to realize the contradiction within the statements: 1) "When you touch something, you don't actually touch it because the negative charge of the electrons in all matter repel each other." 2) "everything you experience is experienced only within your consciousness. That is, there is no reality apart from consciousness." MID: <269e51973939871be9eeaaef420f8a6c@dizum.com> "Who said it's your eyes that see?" HalfADickRick, yet again displaying his unfathomable stupidity. "The Turing test is overrated anyway." HalfADickRick, mad because he's too stupid to pass the Turing test. "The now you experience now simply moves to this now." HalfADickRick's excuse for living in the past. Message-ID: <2e6f960b0b8c4a738b1116b41865cb35@dizum.com> HalfADickRick projects what he thinks of himself: "A fairyboy with an inadequate penis." Message-ID: <d4e79c0adde0074ee812eba8d9023f97@dizum.com> HalfADickRick tried blaming his own screediness on a Visual Basic bot he programmed, k'laming it's artificially intelligent and able to hold contextually-relevant conversations without any assistance... when challenged to put Fred Tehbot to work producing 5000 intelligent and contextually relevant replies per day to random posts, an easy task for a machine, HalfADickRick started backpedaling, evading and hurling insults. In actuality, he was assisting his tardbot by screeding right alongside it to lend it the appearance of intelligence (but only the appearance, because HalfADickRick's pretty retarded LOL). Spanked to tears yet again by reality, he plonked and ran away, tears streaming, fright-piss flowing, a plaintive "WHHHHAAAAAAA!" issuing from his otherwise-dumbstruck mouth. <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 17:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( FNVWE Perimeter Walls ) |
| Message-ID | <qui9ac-ju3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #514608 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT just like your bullshit about the CGI that flew into the > South Tower. And don't forget that a 3D layout of Nuke York City, a path > for the CGI and a synchronization flash in each Tower were all that was > needed to mass produce hundreds of bogus crash videos. There were no CGI's and no synchronization flash, kook. The facts are some airliners were hijacked. Two of them crashed into the World Trade Center towers, starting fires which weakened the central support columns and the buildings collapesed almost 2 hours later. One of them crashed into the Pentagon causing a partial collapse of the western side and one of them crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Everything else is kook babble. That there were nuclear exposives involved is kook babble. That there is missing rubble is kook babble. That there has ever been a nuclear building demolition is kook babble. That part of the buildings were vaporized is kook babble. That part of a building was left standing proves there were nuclear devices is kook babble. That there was an EMP is kook babble. That nuclear devices could be detonated underground and yet were not seen by every eismograph in the world is kook babble. That a failed US Government project that ended in 1973 has anything to do with what happened is kook babble. That the scene was radioactive is kook babble. That there is any simularity between New York and either Hiroshima or Nagasaki is kook babble. That the area was called ground zero proves the event was nuclear is kook babble. That a nuclear bomb can be buried for decades without maintenance and still be expected to work is kook babble. That non-government entities can obtain not one, but multiple nuclear bombs is kook babble. That there were not thousands of eyewitnesses who heard and saw the airplanes hit the towers is kook babble. That all the video was CGI is kook babble. That the exterior walls were designed to deflect airplanes is kook babble. That two of the aircraft landed somewhere else is kook babble. When a nuclear device explodes, it creates a unique seismic signature that can be detected anywhere on the planet. There were no nuclear seismic signatures detected on 9/11 but the collapse of the two towers was detected. This alone is enough to disprove any nuclear devices were used on 9/11. Capitalizing things that shouldn't be capitalized is kook babble. <snip remaining kook babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-17 04:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... ( more 4 FNVWE ) |
| Message-ID | <1j93tah4r2vka8c4gre6rcpp5f40npnpob@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #514494 |
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:35:57 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
>wrote in message news:4a5747b722c6584f0c857d36c83e8efd@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
>Thanks for your input but now you have some other issues to address.
>
>
>>>> If it'd been a nuclear EMP, the *last* thing you would have seen
>>>> from that camera would have been the EMP.
>
>There were quite a few digital devices at Ground Zero that quit working and
>if someone knows there is a possible EMP in the area from a deep underground
>nuke all they had to do is enclose the electronics in a faraday cage since
>there is also a lot of rock in the way.
>
I think people would have noticed the news helicopter trying to
fly while encased in a Faraday cage.
>
>>> riiight that just happened at the exact same times that they needed nukes
>>> to
>>> go off to do what was done to the North Tower.
>>
>> No one "needed nukes to go off". I patiently explained to your
>> retarded ass just a couple days ago how the buildings were
>> unintentionally designed such that in just this scenario, they
>> *would* fall. I'm not the only one who saw it, the building
>> designers had received warnings about the building not being able
>> to withstand an aircraft strike and subsequent fire from as far
>> back as 1971, but they ignored those warnings.
>
>And yet the steel in the outside walls was still twice as thick as that on
>the front end of a tank so why would someone say such a thing? BTW I've
>heard the exact opposite so someone is lying.
>
There were 18" gaps between the girders. This has been explained
several time.
>
>> And as I patiently explained to your retarded ass immediately
>> above, the satellite uplink interference you saw several times on
>> the video wasn't EMP, most especially from a nuke. A nuclear
>> device explodes so quickly (time frame of nanoseconds) that its
>> EMP spike is very short, but very strong.
>
>That might be true for airborne nukes but what do you really know about EMPs
>from deep underground nukes?
>
More than you. Not that this is saying much.
>> Thus the last thing you
>> would have seen from that camera would have been it burning out
>> from the EMP. There wouldn't have been any footage of the tower
>> falling. No amount of shielding would protect the delicate
>> electronics in the camera. Nuclear test sites use cameras in a
>> virgin borated polyethylene and lead-lined room fed by fiber
>> optics to get the picture to the camera.
>
>Yes, I've seen that they use a hell of a lot of fiber obtic cables when they
>film underground nukes. But why don't we ever get to see any of those
>videos and why aren't we told what they learned? <G>
>
>From the very sparse remains of the Twin Towers the people that did all the
>testing of underground nukes knew how to make them appear as if the Twin
>Towers were not brought down by nukes but part of their trick was to film
>the top of the Twin Towers when the nuke goes off way undergroud.
>
But no nukes were used.
>> Besides, here's a camera that got a video of the collapse from
>> much closer, and didn't experience *any* EMP:
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGAofwkAOlo>
>>
>> You'll note the vibration 13 seconds before the collapse, which
>> was the central support column buckling and 1.4 million tons of
>> building beginning to move.
>
>ROTFLMAO because you are trying to tell me the building began to move,
>stopped and then started again in 12-13 seconds at a 66% freefall all the
>way down to the ground?
>
How do you get these crazy ideas from people's posts?
>And just how do you get 66% of freefall all the way down to the ground with
>spotty damage? That does not make sense either.
>
To the educated, everything that occurred made, and makes,
perfect sense.
>But then again, what I'm more interested in is why there were so many
>different helicopters in the area that filmed the North Tower without
>filming some of the other helicopters? It was like the background was fake
>and who knows what else was fake.
>
Now you're just making stuff up.
>-----------------------------
>
>The other possibility is that the ground shaking coincides with when the
>deep underground nuke was detonated and it took 12 seconds to work through
>all the rock it was under. Then it only vaporized up to the alleged impact
>area to make people blame the 66% of freefall on a CGI. <G>
>
But no CGIs were utilized.
>And given that the CGIs didn't have any crash dynamics whatsoever who knows
>what other bs we were given about the deep underground nukes going off at
>"Ground Zero." More about this in the second video listed below.
But, as you know, there were no CGIs.
>
>And given that people that added the CGIs to videos also left the
>synchronization flash in the videos why should we believe the CGIs were
>real? Especially after seeing right through the bullshit we were given
>about the Pentagon and Pranksville, PA. Also see:
>
You can lie about CGIs all you want. Doing so will not suddenly
make them real.
>9/11 no planes compilation - interesting!
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BswpAgwBNEw
>
Bunk.
But you already know that.
>and
>
>07 - The Key
>( time indexed to start with the CGI )
>https://youtu.be/Rml2TL5N8ds?t=30m35s
>
See above.
>
>> But you'll note from this very, very
>> close camera that *no* EMP was evident. Had there been a nuke
>> EMP, that camera would be burned out so quickly we wouldn't even
>> have gotten a chance to see the vibration prior to the collapse,
>> let alone the collapse itself.
>
>It is very obvious to me you are confusing airborne nukes with deep
>underground nukes so why can't you point out the difference?
>
Explain, in detail, how EMPs from underground nukes work, Rocky.
>> Here's a camera *inside* the WTC tower *while* *it* *was*
>> *collapsing*...
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo>
>> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column
>> buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No
>> amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP.
>
>ROTFLMAO because if that came from the Naudet Brothers documentary that
>documentary shows clear evidence of being manipulated on a close of up the
>first CGI. They knew the cutout in the North Tower was too short for the
>alleged 767 that was supposed to have rammed it so they extended the cutout.
>.
You will, of course, provide valid, verifiable evidence of this,
right?
>
>> Those two pieces of evidence alone completely destroy your kook
>> konspiracy theory. How many different ways has your kooky theory
>> been torn apart? Eight?
>
>Your story about the start and stop and restart of the collapse is
>questionable and your story about EMPs doesn't take into account the nukes
>detonated way underground in solid rock.
>
Where, in reality please, did FNVW present such a story?
>Plus you have never even tried to address how two 110 story buildings could
>leave so little debris on the ground and yet leave walls that didn't have
>anything supporting them and stood from 6 to 8 stories tall.
Not only did FNVW try, he was able to explain how you are wrong.
That you are unable to learn what he taught is your issue to address.
>And yes, I've
>looked at your photos in another post and they don't really compare to the
>Twin Towers.
Yes, they do. You can lie about this if you need to, but the
truth will remain the same.
>
>As for the other EMPs recorded in the video by WCBS.
No EMPs were recorded.
>Those could also have
>been from the much smaller nukes they used to cutout a hole in WTC6 and in
>other areas. See:
>
>Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever !
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo
>
There were no EMPs caused by nukes. You are, of course, free to
provide actual evidence that there were. Your whining about other
items will be viewed as an admission by you that there is no evidence
to present.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-16 09:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Here, Rocky... prove yourself wrong... (laughing at FNVWE) |
| Message-ID | <hpWdnbcGuolCB03InZ2dnUU7-eednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #514133 |
"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote in message news:1087c0b89cb5fc3c07f44c1a14ed458c@dizum.com... > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Rocky, in <news:9e2dnSynY8CSZVLInZ2dnUU7-WednZ2d@giganews.com> > did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >> "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> >> wrote in message news:6b45c726d40c2a4a4edb3b9954a737cf@dizum.com... > >>> The EMP took place, if you'll refer back to the link to the video >>> *you* provided, when the planes hit the towers and exploded, >>> *not* when the towers collapsed, you idiotic dipshit. LOL > >> Now wait a second. The link I use to support the fact EMPs were recorded >> in >> Nuke York City is: >> http://youtu.be/Jxpc6DBHeFA?t=3m30s > > Bwahahaha! That wasn't an EMP, you clueless goof. That was > satellite uplink interference. Damn you have turned into a nitpicker just like Jim. So that was satellite interference caused by an EMP. Are you happy now? > It happens from time to time. Especially when there is an EMP in the area. DUH. Besides nobody ever proved WCBS used Satellite but they have proven they use AM instead of FM. But then again that was obvious since we might not have noticed the affects of an EMP if they used FM. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web