Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #711412 > unrolled thread

CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!!

Started byyporat08@gmail.com
First post2018-11-03 22:25 -0700
Last post2018-11-07 01:38 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 38 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:25 -0700
    Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 22:27 -0700
    Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 08:52 -0800
      Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:45 +0000
        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
          Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 22:14 +0000
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 17:08 -0800
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 18:23 -0800
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 18:55 -0800
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:00 +0000
                Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-04 22:17 -0800
                  Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:59 +0000
                    Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 06:46 -0800
                      Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 15:26 +0000
                        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:55 -0800
                          Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:42 +0000
                            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0800
                              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 21:28 +0000
                                Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:42 -0800
                            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 10:24 -0800
                        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 10:27 -0800
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Davey Jones <djones1998@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:15 -0800
          Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:21 -0800
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 21:50 -0500
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 22:34 -0800
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 22:32 -0800
      Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-05 13:59 -0800
        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 16:53 -0800
        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 13:15 -0800
          Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-06 14:03 -0800
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 14:52 -0800
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 18:25 -0500
              Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:30 -0800
            Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:21 -0800
    Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! "I. Seymour Butts" <invalid@example.com> - 2018-11-04 09:37 -0800
    Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! Steve Jones <SJones1995@gmaile.com> - 2018-11-06 19:05 -0800
      Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-06 22:39 -0800
        Re: CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!! yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-11-07 01:38 -0800

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#711412 — CURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!!

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-03 22:25 -0700
SubjectCURVED SPACE'' -AND THER EDIGTON EXPERIMENT ??!!
Message-ID<59d1ed43-4a0f-4ce9-bff3-11f4d22ace73@googlegroups.com>
one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
    his 'curved space ''THEORY  
if so 
can  anyone  hear  tell   us


 --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
--and around   it 
and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??

TIA
Y.Porat
========================

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#711413

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-03 22:27 -0700
Message-ID<3742837c-b397-4e64-b57c-e37f424d9ed8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711412
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>     his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> if so 
> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> 
> 
>  --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
> --and around   it 
> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ========================

sorry typo 
curved space'

TIA

Y.P
=======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711461

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-04 08:52 -0800
Message-ID<e08adb48-a4a9-47d3-8f37-b49cc2e17b7e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711412
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>     his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> if so 
> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> 
> 
>  --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
> --and around   it 
> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> 
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ========================

no answer is an answer as well !!!!
until now
no one can explain /describe 
how    curved space
look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
I man  not  only in this    NG
but in general and   everywhere 
just mumblings are  going on  here 
and there 
===============
TIA
Y.P
===============

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711487

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-04 18:45 +0000
Message-ID<prneo8$1c9l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711461
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
>> if so 
>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
>> 
>> 
>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
>> --and around   it 
>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
>> 
>> TIA
>> Y.Porat
>> ========================
> 
> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> until now
> no one can explain /describe 
> how    curved space
> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!

Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
answers you went mute. 

Now here you are doing it on another topic. 

> I man  not  only in this    NG
> but in general and   everywhere 
> just mumblings are  going on  here 
> and there 
> ===============
> TIA
> Y.P
> ===============
> 
>  
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711499

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
Message-ID<dd228e46-252e-45af-a373-ff901a2b7c09@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711487
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
> >> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> >> if so 
> >> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> >> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
> >> --and around   it 
> >> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> >> 
> >> TIA
> >> Y.Porat
> >> ========================
> > 
> > no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> > until now
> > no one can explain /describe 
> > how    curved space
> > look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
> 
> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
> answers you went mute. 
> 
> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
> 
> > I man  not  only in this    NG
> > but in general and   everywhere 
> > just mumblings are  going on  here 
> > and there 
> > ===============
> > TIA
> > Y.P
> > ===============
> > 
> >  
 
==================
what is that you don't understand little parrot
I wanted to show  
that idiots like you 
speak about curved  space  right ??
as the maim actor of gravity
if so
I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
called  CURVED SPACE 
that is doing  gravity
if so 
just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES !!) just the  great magician 
that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
so 
if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
tell us 
how is that wizard  (curved  space )
how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
is it just one curve around all involved  masses
is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
in short 
you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
A BIG NOTHING !!

got it idiot crock ??
if you don't understand 
say

I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
JUST BASIC DECENCY !!

that  is demanded form a real  scientist
we are not here 
in a fish (fishy )market !!!
===
Y.Porat 
===============================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711534

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-04 22:14 +0000
Message-ID<prnr0e$1pl$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711499
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
>>>> if so 
>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
>>>> --and around   it 
>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
>>>> 
>>>> TIA
>>>> Y.Porat
>>>> ========================
>>> 
>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
>>> until now
>>> no one can explain /describe 
>>> how    curved space
>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
>> 
>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
>> answers you went mute. 
>> 
>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
>> 
>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
>>> but in general and   everywhere 
>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
>>> and there 
>>> ===============
>>> TIA
>>> Y.P
>>> ===============
>>> 
>>> 
>  
> ==================
> what is that you don't understand little parrot
> I wanted to show  
> that idiots like you 
> speak about curved  space  right ??
> as the maim actor of gravity
> if so
> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
> called  CURVED SPACE 
> that is doing  gravity
> if so 
> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
> !!) just the  great magician 
> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
> so 
> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
> tell us 
> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
> in short 
> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
> A BIG NOTHING !!

That’s wrong. Sorry. 

> 
> got it idiot crock ??
> if you don't understand 
> say
> 
> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
> 
> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
> we are not here 
> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
> ===
> Y.Porat 
> ===============================================
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711555

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-04 17:08 -0800
Message-ID<0b9fcb3e-1dec-43bf-9c56-83362546e6f3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711534
Odd
“That’s wrong. Sorry. 
”
A new record for Odd.
Two lies in a 3 word sentence.
Well done

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711564

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-04 18:23 -0800
Message-ID<3b11bb3f-d7c6-4154-97ce-3c3edf1c371b@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711534
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
> >>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> >>>> if so 
> >>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> >>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
> >>>> --and around   it 
> >>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> >>>> 
> >>>> TIA
> >>>> Y.Porat
> >>>> ========================
> >>> 
> >>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> >>> until now
> >>> no one can explain /describe 
> >>> how    curved space
> >>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
> >> 
> >> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
> >> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
> >> answers you went mute. 
> >> 
> >> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
> >> 
> >>> I man  not  only in this    NG
> >>> but in general and   everywhere 
> >>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
> >>> and there 
> >>> ===============
> >>> TIA
> >>> Y.P
> >>> ===============
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >  
> > ==================
> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
> > I wanted to show  
> > that idiots like you 
> > speak about curved  space  right ??
> > as the maim actor of gravity
> > if so
> > I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
> > called  CURVED SPACE 
> > that is doing  gravity
> > if so 
> > just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
> > !!) just the  great magician 
> > that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
> > so 
> > if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
> > tell us 
> > how is that wizard  (curved  space )
> > how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
> > is it just one curve around all involved  masses
> > is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
> > in short 
> > you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
> > mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
> > A BIG NOTHING !!
> 
> That’s wrong. Sorry. 
> 
> > 
> > got it idiot crock ??
> > if you don't understand 
> > say
> > 
> > I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
> > JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
> > 
> > that  is demanded form a real  scientist
> > we are not here 
> > in a fish (fishy )market !!!
> > ===
> > Y.Porat 
> > ===============================================
> > > 
>===================
I ask you Bodkin 
a simple question :

the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
a big triumph of 'curves space'
in that experiment at  least   
3 main asses  where involved  in  it
 if  so
a basic  needed question has to be explained :

how was ''curved space' was looking like 
even just approximately  like --
-- during that famous experiment ?!!
that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
for 
curved space' story ??

2
I was asking another question 

what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
=================
TIA
Y.P
======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711568

Frommitchrae3323@gmail.com
Date2018-11-04 18:55 -0800
Message-ID<107219d4-ddc7-4e0a-a468-ba929999ac9d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711564
On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 6:23:45 PM UTC-8, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> > >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
> > >>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> > >>>> if so 
> > >>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> > >>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!=
> > >>>> --and around   it 
> > >>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> TIA
> > >>>> Y.Porat
> > >>>> ========================
> > >>> 
> > >>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> > >>> until now
> > >>> no one can explain /describe 
> > >>> how    curved space
> > >>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
> > >> 
> > >> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
> > >> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
> > >> answers you went mute. 
> > >> 
> > >> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
> > >> 
> > >>> I man  not  only in this    NG
> > >>> but in general and   everywhere 
> > >>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
> > >>> and there 
> > >>> ===============
> > >>> TIA
> > >>> Y.P
> > >>> ===============
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >  
> > > ==================
> > > what is that you don't understand little parrot
> > > I wanted to show  
> > > that idiots like you 
> > > speak about curved  space  right ??
> > > as the maim actor of gravity
> > > if so
> > > I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
> > > called  CURVED SPACE 
> > > that is doing  gravity
> > > if so 
> > > just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
> > > !!) just the  great magician 
> > > that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
> > > so 
> > > if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
> > > tell us 
> > > how is that wizard  (curved  space )
> > > how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
> > > is it just one curve around all involved  masses
> > > is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
> > > in short 
> > > you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
> > > mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
> > > A BIG NOTHING !!
> > 
> > That’s wrong. Sorry. 
> > 
> > > 
> > > got it idiot crock ??
> > > if you don't understand 
> > > say
> > > 
> > > I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
> > > JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
> > > 
> > > that  is demanded form a real  scientist
> > > we are not here 
> > > in a fish (fishy )market !!!
> > > ===
> > > Y.Porat 
> > > ===============================================
> > > > 
> >===================
> I ask you Bodkin 
> a simple question :
> 
> the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
> a big triumph of 'curves space'
> in that experiment at  least   
> 3 main asses  where involved  in  it
>  if  so
> a basic  needed question has to be explained :
> 
> how was ''curved space' was looking like 
> even just approximately  like --
> -- during that famous experiment ?!!
> that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
> for 
> curved space' story ??
> 
> 2
> I was asking another question 
> 
> what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
> that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
> IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
> A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
> =================
> TIA
> Y.P
> ======================

Gravity curves motion.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711570

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 03:00 +0000
Message-ID<proboo$nsq$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711564
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
>>>>>> if so 
>>>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
>>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around   it 
>>>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>> Y.Porat
>>>>>> =======================> >>> 
>>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
>>>>> until now
>>>>> no one can explain /describe 
>>>>> how    curved space
>>>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
>>>> 
>>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
>>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
>>>> answers you went mute. 
>>>> 
>>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
>>>> 
>>>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
>>>>> but in general and   everywhere 
>>>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
>>>>> and there 
>>>>> ==============> >>> TIA
>>>>> Y.P
>>>>> ==============> >>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
>>> I wanted to show  
>>> that idiots like you 
>>> speak about curved  space  right ??
>>> as the maim actor of gravity
>>> if so
>>> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
>>> called  CURVED SPACE 
>>> that is doing  gravity
>>> if so 
>>> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
>>> !!) just the  great magician 
>>> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
>>> so 
>>> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
>>> tell us 
>>> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
>>> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
>>> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
>>> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
>>> in short 
>>> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
>>> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
>>> A BIG NOTHING !!
>> 
>> Thats wrong. Sorry. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> got it idiot crock ??
>>> if you don't understand 
>>> say
>>> 
>>> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
>>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
>>> 
>>> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
>>> we are not here 
>>> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
>>> ==> > Y.Porat 
>>> ==============================================> > > 
>> ==================I ask you Bodkin 
> a simple question :
> 
> the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
> a big triumph of 'curves space'
> in that experiment at  least   
> 3 main asses  where involved  in  it
>  if  so
> a basic  needed question has to be explained :
> 
> how was ''curved space' was looking like 
> even just approximately  like --
> -- during that famous experiment ?!!
> that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
> for 
> curved space' story ??

I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the
vicinity of the earth’s surface, using the simple everyday observation of
throwing a baseball 30 feet. 

This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of
spacetime near the sun’s surface. Just follow the same calculation.
Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the
earth. 

> 
> 2
> I was asking another question 
> 
> what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
> that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
> IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
> A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!

There aren’t any minimal ones. 

> ================TIA
> Y.P
> =====================  
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711600

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-04 22:17 -0800
Message-ID<13a15d36-07ba-4962-abba-924068eb820f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711570
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:00:47 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
> >>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> >>>>>> if so 
> >>>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> >>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around   it 
> >>>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> TIA
> >>>>>> Y.Porat
> >>>>>> =======================> >>> 
> >>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> >>>>> until now
> >>>>> no one can explain /describe 
> >>>>> how    curved space
> >>>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
> >>>> 
> >>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
> >>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
> >>>> answers you went mute. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
> >>>>> but in general and   everywhere 
> >>>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
> >>>>> and there 
> >>>>> ==============> >>> TIA
> >>>>> Y.P
> >>>>> ==============> >>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
> >>> I wanted to show  
> >>> that idiots like you 
> >>> speak about curved  space  right ??
> >>> as the maim actor of gravity
> >>> if so
> >>> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
> >>> called  CURVED SPACE 
> >>> that is doing  gravity
> >>> if so 
> >>> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
> >>> !!) just the  great magician 
> >>> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
> >>> so 
> >>> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
> >>> tell us 
> >>> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
> >>> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
> >>> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
> >>> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
> >>> in short 
> >>> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
> >>> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
> >>> A BIG NOTHING !!
> >> 
> >> That s wrong. Sorry. 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> got it idiot crock ??
> >>> if you don't understand 
> >>> say
> >>> 
> >>> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
> >>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
> >>> 
> >>> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
> >>> we are not here 
> >>> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
> >>> ==> > Y.Porat 
> >>> ==============================================> > > 
> >> ==================I ask you Bodkin 
> > a simple question :
> > 
> > the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
> > a big triumph of 'curves space'
> > in that experiment at  least   
> > 3 main asses  where involved  in  it
> >  if  so
> > a basic  needed question has to be explained :
> > 
> > how was ''curved space' was looking like 
> > even just approximately  like --
> > -- during that famous experiment ?!!
> > that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
> > for 
> > curved space' story ??
> 
> I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the
> vicinity of the earth’s surface, using the simple everyday observation of
> throwing a baseball 30 feet. 
> 
> This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of
> spacetime near the sun’s surface. Just follow the same calculation.
> Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the
> earth. 
> 
> > 
> > 2
> > I was asking another question 
> > 
> > what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
> > that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
> > IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
> > A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
> 
> There aren’t any minimal ones. 
> 
> > ================TIA
> > Y.P
 ===============================
imbecile !!!!

just length   is goo enough to  make it 
AN **ACTIVE* PHYSICAL ENRITY !!!???!!
what for were the 
M K S or c g s system whee created ??
and HUSED SO LONG ANS SOSUCCESFULL YY !!!
2
can you idiot 
 even  just detect a physical  entity that has 
for instance no mass ??

sorry my rudeness  but there should be a limit 
to damaging 

===
Y.P
=============

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711618

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 12:59 +0000
Message-ID<prpeqm$its$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711600
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:00:47 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>>>>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
>>>>>>>> if so 
>>>>>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
>>>>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around   it 
>>>>>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>> Y.Porat
>>>>>>>> =======================> >>> 
>>>>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
>>>>>>> until now
>>>>>>> no one can explain /describe 
>>>>>>> how    curved space
>>>>>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
>>>>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
>>>>>> answers you went mute. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
>>>>>>> but in general and   everywhere 
>>>>>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
>>>>>>> and there 
>>>>>>> ==============> >>> TIA
>>>>>>> Y.P
>>>>>>> ==============> >>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
>>>>> I wanted to show  
>>>>> that idiots like you 
>>>>> speak about curved  space  right ??
>>>>> as the maim actor of gravity
>>>>> if so
>>>>> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
>>>>> called  CURVED SPACE 
>>>>> that is doing  gravity
>>>>> if so 
>>>>> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
>>>>> !!) just the  great magician 
>>>>> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
>>>>> so 
>>>>> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
>>>>> tell us 
>>>>> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
>>>>> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
>>>>> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
>>>>> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
>>>>> in short 
>>>>> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
>>>>> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
>>>>> A BIG NOTHING !!
>>>> 
>>>> That s wrong. Sorry. 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> got it idiot crock ??
>>>>> if you don't understand 
>>>>> say
>>>>> 
>>>>> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
>>>>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
>>>>> 
>>>>> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
>>>>> we are not here 
>>>>> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
>>>>> ==> > Y.Porat 
>>>>> ==============================================> > > 
>>>> ==================I ask you Bodkin 
>>> a simple question :
>>> 
>>> the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
>>> a big triumph of 'curves space'
>>> in that experiment at  least   
>>> 3 main asses  where involved  in  it
>>> if  so
>>> a basic  needed question has to be explained :
>>> 
>>> how was ''curved space' was looking like 
>>> even just approximately  like --
>>> -- during that famous experiment ?!!
>>> that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
>>> for 
>>> curved space' story ??
>> 
>> I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the
>> vicinity of the earths surface, using the simple everyday observation of
>> throwing a baseball 30 feet. 
>> 
>> This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of
>> spacetime near the suns surface. Just follow the same calculation.
>> Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the
>> earth. 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 2
>>> I was asking another question 
>>> 
>>> what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
>>> that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
>>> IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
>>> A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
>> 
>> There arent any minimal ones. 
>> 
>>> ================TIA
>>> Y.P
>  ==============================imbecile !!!!
> 
> just length   is goo enough to  make it 
> AN **ACTIVE* PHYSICAL ENRITY !!!???!!
> what for were the 
> M K S or c g s system whee created ??

Not for what you think. Not to set a minimum for physical entity. 

> and HUSED SO LONG ANS SOSUCCESFULL YY !!!
> 2
> can you idiot 
>  even  just detect a physical  entity that has 
> for instance no mass ??
> 
> sorry my rudeness  but there should be a limit 
> to damaging 
> 
> ==Y.P
> =============   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711624

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-05 06:46 -0800
Message-ID<bb85bb84-d7f9-4aad-8fd4-1fc42178dbfb@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711618
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 2:59:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:00:47 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
> >>>>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
> >>>>>>>> if so 
> >>>>>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
> >>>>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around   it 
> >>>>>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> TIA
> >>>>>>>> Y.Porat
> >>>>>>>> =======================> >>> 
> >>>>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
> >>>>>>> until now
> >>>>>>> no one can explain /describe 
> >>>>>>> how    curved space
> >>>>>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
> >>>>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
> >>>>>> answers you went mute. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
> >>>>>>> but in general and   everywhere 
> >>>>>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
> >>>>>>> and there 
> >>>>>>> ==============> >>> TIA
> >>>>>>> Y.P
> >>>>>>> ==============> >>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
> >>>>> I wanted to show  
> >>>>> that idiots like you 
> >>>>> speak about curved  space  right ??
> >>>>> as the maim actor of gravity
> >>>>> if so
> >>>>> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
> >>>>> called  CURVED SPACE 
> >>>>> that is doing  gravity
> >>>>> if so 
> >>>>> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
> >>>>> !!) just the  great magician 
> >>>>> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
> >>>>> so 
> >>>>> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
> >>>>> tell us 
> >>>>> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
> >>>>> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
> >>>>> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
> >>>>> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
> >>>>> in short 
> >>>>> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
> >>>>> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
> >>>>> A BIG NOTHING !!
> >>>> 
> >>>> That s wrong. Sorry. 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> got it idiot crock ??
> >>>>> if you don't understand 
> >>>>> say
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
> >>>>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
> >>>>> we are not here 
> >>>>> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
> >>>>> ==> > Y.Porat 
> >>>>> ==============================================> > > 
> >>>> ==================I ask you Bodkin 
> >>> a simple question :
> >>> 
> >>> the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
> >>> a big triumph of 'curves space'
> >>> in that experiment at  least   
> >>> 3 main Msses  where involved  in  it
> >>> if  so
> >>> a basic  needed question has to be explained :
> >>> 
> >>> how was ''curved space' was looking like 
> >>> even just approximately  like --
> >>> -- during that famous experiment ?!!
> >>> that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
> >>> for 
> >>> curved space' story ??
> >> 
> >> I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the
> >> vicinity of the earth s surface, using the simple everyday observation of
> >> throwing a baseball 30 feet.

===============
YOU DINT ANSWR 
HOW DOES YOUR FEN CURVED SPACE
LOOK LIKE  
AROUND    THE 3!!!! MASSES INVOLVED 
SUN 
PLANT
AND EARTH ??!
> >> 
> >> This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of
> >> spacetime near the sun s surface. Just follow the same calculation.

PIGGY
TELL US HOE IT LOOKS LIKE ALL 
ARUND ALLABOVE  3  MASSES /!!???



> >> Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the
> >> earth. 
===
BUT PIGGY 
YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH ** ALL**  OF THEM
  simultaneously !!!!
because ha was the REALITY THERE qq

er
========

> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> 2
> >>> I was asking another question 
> >>> 
> >>> what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
> >>> that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
> >>> IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
> >>> A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
> >> 
> >> There aren t any minimal ones. 
=
oh o see 
length is good enough for all  sound  physics?
but even for length
you need point of mass there !! 
you did not answer that
 !
complicated for a genius like you ???
 > >>> ================TIA
> > >  ==============================imbecile !!!!
> > 
> > if just length   is goo enough to  make it 
> > AN **ACTIVE* PHYSICAL ENRITY !!!???!!
> > what for were the 
> > M K S or c g s system whee created ??
> ===============================================
> Not for what you think. Not to set a minimum for physical entity.
==================
if so 
FOR WAHT ??!!

==
don't you  (here I snip the insult) )
so 
don't  you understand that
you  cant   measure   a distance  in  space 
UNLESS   THERE ARE POINTS OF MASSIN IY ?? !!

== 
> 
> > and used  SO LONG AND SO  SUCCESFULL YY !!!
> > 2
> > can you idiot 
> >  even  just detect a physical  entity that has 
> > for instance no mass ??
> > 
> > sorry my rudeness  but there should be a limit 
> > to damaging 
> > 
> > ==Y.P
> > =============

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711631

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 15:26 +0000
Message-ID<prpner$12p5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711624
<yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 2:59:08 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 5:00:47 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 12:14:44 AM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 8:45:32 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> <yporat08@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, November 4, 2018 at 7:25:06 AM UTC+2, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> one of the big' Triumphs'    of Einstein about
>>>>>>>>>> his 'curved space ''THEORY  
>>>>>>>>>> if so 
>>>>>>>>>> can  anyone  hear  tell   us
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --HOW WAS  'CURVED SOPACE'  LOOK LIKE
>>>>>>>>>> DURING THAT EDIGTON EXPERINET ??!!> >>>> --and around   it 
>>>>>>>>>> and even  if difficult - just in general lines ??
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>>>> Y.Porat
>>>>>>>>>> =======================> >>> 
>>>>>>>>> no answer is an answer as well !!!!
>>>>>>>>> until now
>>>>>>>>> no one can explain /describe 
>>>>>>>>> how    curved space
>>>>>>>>> look like  at the Edington  experiment !!!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Manipulative lying. You said the same thing about curvature calculations,
>>>>>>>> and you said the same thing about GR in the GPS system. Then when given
>>>>>>>> answers you went mute. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Now here you are doing it on another topic. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I man  not  only in this    NG
>>>>>>>>> but in general and   everywhere 
>>>>>>>>> just mumblings are  going on  here 
>>>>>>>>> and there 
>>>>>>>>> ==============> >>> TIA
>>>>>>>>> Y.P
>>>>>>>>> ==============> >>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> =================> > what is that you don't understand little parrot
>>>>>>> I wanted to show  
>>>>>>> that idiots like you 
>>>>>>> speak about curved  space  right ??
>>>>>>> as the maim actor of gravity
>>>>>>> if so
>>>>>>> I ask you to  discrine your 'main hero of gravity
>>>>>>> called  CURVED SPACE 
>>>>>>> that is doing  gravity
>>>>>>> if so 
>>>>>>> just go on and tell us how is that curved  space of your (AND NOT MASES
>>>>>>> !!) just the  great magician 
>>>>>>> that you call ''curved space' is creating   gravity in  that  Edington experiment ?
>>>>>>> so 
>>>>>>> if it such a big magician  (that curved space '')
>>>>>>> tell us 
>>>>>>> how is that wizard  (curved  space )
>>>>>>> how is took like while so many masses are  involved in it _
>>>>>>> is it just one curve around all involved  masses
>>>>>>> is  it many  different curves   around any mass  involved with it   etc etc 
>>>>>>> in short 
>>>>>>> you have not the faintest idea  about what you are 
>>>>>>> mumbling around magic curved space that  is actually
>>>>>>> A BIG NOTHING !!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That s wrong. Sorry. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> got it idiot crock ??
>>>>>>> if you don't understand 
>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I DONT  UNDERSAND WAHT I AM TALKING ABOUT   
>>>>>>> JUST BASIC DECENCY !!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> that  is demanded form a real  scientist
>>>>>>> we are not here 
>>>>>>> in a fish (fishy )market !!!
>>>>>>> ==> > Y.Porat 
>>>>>>> ==============================================> > > 
>>>>>> ==================I ask you Bodkin 
>>>>> a simple question :
>>>>> 
>>>>> the  EDIGTON EXPERIMENT WAS CONSIDRED 
>>>>> a big triumph of 'curves space'
>>>>> in that experiment at  least   
>>>>> 3 main Msses  where involved  in  it
>>>>> if  so
>>>>> a basic  needed question has to be explained :
>>>>> 
>>>>> how was ''curved space' was looking like 
>>>>> even just approximately  like --
>>>>> -- during that famous experiment ?!!
>>>>> that was considered  a breakthrough experiment 
>>>>> for 
>>>>> curved space' story ??
>>>> 
>>>> I already showed you how to calculate the curvature of spacetime in the
>>>> vicinity of the earth s surface, using the simple everyday observation of
>>>> throwing a baseball 30 feet.
> 
> ===============
> YOU DINT ANSWR 
> HOW DOES YOUR FEN CURVED SPACE
> LOOK LIKE  
> AROUND    THE 3!!!! MASSES INVOLVED 
> SUN 
> PLANT
> AND EARTH ??!

What plant? You mean planet? The only planet involved in the Eddington
experiment was the Earth. If you don’t know what Eddington did, try reading
a book about it. 

There are 4D wells surrounding the sun and the earth, and the one around
the sun dominates the experiment completely for obvious reasons. 

>>>> 
>>>> This same kind of calculation can be used to calculate the curvature of
>>>> spacetime near the sun s surface. Just follow the same calculation.
> 
> PIGGY
> TELL US HOE IT LOOKS LIKE ALL 
> ARUND ALLABOVE  3  MASSES /!!???
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Substituting the mass and radius of the sun for the mass and radius of the
>>>> earth. 
> ===
> BUT PIGGY 
> YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH ** ALL**  OF THEM
>   simultaneously !!!!
> because ha was the REALITY THERE qq

No, you really don’t. The sun was BY FAR the biggest mass in the experiment
and so the effect of any other bodies is negligible. Second, the bending
only is significant if the light is grazing tangentially. The light came in
almost vertically to the earth and so no significant bending happens there.


You really have NO idea other than a cartoon version what this experiment
measured and how, do you?

> 
> er
> ========
> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2
>>>>> I was asking another question 
>>>>> 
>>>>> what are/is  the minimal number of basic physical dimensions 
>>>>> that are  the   needed for a PHYSICAL ENTITY
>>>>> IN  ORDER OF BEING CONSIDERD  
>>>>> A PHYSICAL  ENTITY ??!
>>>> 
>>>> There aren t any minimal ones. 
> =
> oh o see 
> length is good enough for all  sound  physics?
> but even for length
> you need point of mass there !! 
> you did not answer that
>  !
> complicated for a genius like you ???
>  > >>> ================TIA
>>>> ==============================imbecile !!!!
>>> 
>>> if just length   is goo enough to  make it 
>>> AN **ACTIVE* PHYSICAL ENRITY !!!???!!
>>> what for were the 
>>> M K S or c g s system whee created ??
>> ===============================================
>> Not for what you think. Not to set a minimum for physical entity.
> ==================
> if so 
> FOR WAHT ??!!

For setting a stable and reproducible standard for unit measures. Period.
That’s ALL its for. 

> 
> ==
> don't you  (here I snip the insult) )
> so 
> don't  you understand that
> you  cant   measure   a distance  in  space 
> UNLESS   THERE ARE POINTS OF MASSIN IY ?? !!
> 
> == 
>> 
>>> and used  SO LONG AND SO  SUCCESFULL YY !!!
>>> 2
>>> can you idiot 
>>> even  just detect a physical  entity that has 
>>> for instance no mass ??
>>> 
>>> sorry my rudeness  but there should be a limit 
>>> to damaging 
>>> 
>>> ==Y.P
>>> =============   
>  
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711633

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 07:55 -0800
Message-ID<a3376477-c7c3-45cc-8d8f-92acef41a1fc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711631
I love how Oddiot and MM say that Space can curve, but it can’t spin
Hahahaha

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711646

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 17:42 +0000
Message-ID<prpvds$1ihf$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711633
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> I love how Oddiot and MM say that Space can curve, but it can’t spin
> Hahahaha
> 

Does curve, doesn’t spin. 
The first matches experimental evidence QUANTITATIVELY. 

Your wild-ass conjectures without numerical comparison with data are
POINTLESS. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711650

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 10:20 -0800
Message-ID<b4ba74b9-e6fa-4c7e-bf63-a740081d4b2e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711646
Odd
“Does curve, doesn’t spin. ”
Hahahaha 
Again!!!
Hahahaha

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711695

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 21:28 +0000
Message-ID<prqcml$b78$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#711650
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> Odd
> “Does curve, doesn’t spin. ”
> Hahahaha 
> Again!!!
> Hahahaha
> 

Hoot all you want. It’s all Greek to you. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711767

Fromyporat08@gmail.com
Date2018-11-05 16:42 -0800
Message-ID<fa3f96eb-59cf-4f3b-9126-6be782c38253@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711695
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 11:28:58 PM UTC+2, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Odd
> > “Does curve, doesn’t spin. ”
> > Hahahaha 
> > Again!!!
> > Hahahaha
> > 
> 
> Hoot all you want. It’s all Greek to you. 
> 
>===========================

 shameless  CROCK !!!
=============================
Y.P
================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#711651

Fromjohn <johnsefton288@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-05 10:24 -0800
Message-ID<ffb2dbf4-c922-4d9a-84f9-b591b0b6a2b7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#711646
Oddiot
“Does curve, doesn’t spin. ”

The total disintegration of a brain- QM-driven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web