Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #706793 > unrolled thread

kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 22:05 -0700
    Porat-- a Jewish stealing machine Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 22:10 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 22:57 -0700
      Is Porat the vanguard of how Jews steal science from Gentiles in the future-- nonexistent abstracts, baby talk, and only accusations of stealing Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:47 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 23:48 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 07:15 +0000
        kibo wants to steal Technion University physics dept Israel Amos Yarom,Shlomit Tarem,Ari Turner,Jeff Steinhauer,Yael Shadmi,Yoav Sagi,Yoram Rozen,Shlomo Razamat,Daniel Podolsky,Netanel Lindner,Yakov Krasik,Amit Keren,Amit Kanigel Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 00:32 -0700
          Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 14:45 +0000
            How did Porat make his living? Didn't he post that he stole bridges in Israel. But where did he sell them? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:50 -0700
            Terence Tao must believe in Moroney's failed ellipse proof is a conic, for Tao is silent// but does Tao also think 938 is 12% short of 945 ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 21:50 -0700
              Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-10 05:32 +0000
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:39 -0700
                  Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-11 01:45 +0000
                    Yea, Porat stealing Moroney (frankly he was worthless in science) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:06 -0700
                      Re: Yea, Porat stealing Moroney (frankly he was worthless in science) poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 06:41 -0700
                        if porat is a Israeli computer program, you have to make it stop accusing others of stealing, and footnote source Lord Kelvin, Tait for circlon Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:22 -0700
                          endless baby talk porat and then endless stealing and accusations of stealing, that is what this nutjob teaches youngsters Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:35 -0700
                            sci.physics has endured 5 or more years of this stealing creep and time to kick him out Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 13:18 -0700
                              Re: sci.physics has endured 5 or more years of this stealing creep and time to kick him out Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 17:48 -0700
                                Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:50 -0700
                                  Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:12 -0700
                                    Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:15 -0700
                                      Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 15:09 -0700
                                        Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 17:26 -0700
                                          Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-17 04:42 +0000
                                            Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 21:53 -0700
            Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 02:50 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-09 14:59 -0700
        Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 22:21 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Nate Higgers <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-09 16:45 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 21:53 -0700
        Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 02:36 -0700
        Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Pete Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-18 07:16 -0700
          Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 08:07 -0700
            science is not baby talk-- and Porat is nothing but baby talk--Porat teaches the young to steal science, not do science---- Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 14:30 -0700
            Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 12:28 -0700
              Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 19:52 -0700
                Re: Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-25 00:05 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-26 02:49 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#708265 — Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias

HOW CAN A PHOTON MOVE- IN SPACE -THAT IS NOT EMPTY ?
13 posts by 5 authors  



pora...@gmail.com 	
Oct 12


How can a photon move - in space ,that is not **empty ??!! 

TIA 
Y.POrat 
====================== 

Baez Crackpot list-- John Baez, chief crackpot-- thousands of fake names, spends more time with crackpot posts than with actually doing any physics or math.

No wonder he is a bi-- physics and math, for could never master either one

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708312 — Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias

Is John Baez Reber?


	WHAT IS THE SECRET OF GLUE MATERIALS /?
Oct 14pora...@gmail.com
what is the secrete of glue materials i was searching Wikipedia about and dint get even a basic understanding about that and dint get not ev
Oct 14pora...@gmail.com
lets try a common hint ": it is known that if we want to glue a surface ' it should not be contaminated for instance -with oil why ?? TIA Y.
Oct 14Double-A
Could gluons have something to do with it? Double-A
12:13 AMpora...@gmail.com
================== Hi A A!! my friend i am not sure about 'glueon ' i am not familiar with them it seems to me that Glue Ons is just a name
3:48 PMreber G=emc^2
- show quoted text -
Best animal using glue is the barnicale When I had that cabin 32 ft. boat I had to use a chisel and hammer to knock them off.They use their fast drying glue under water WOW.Their shell is as hard as a rock and it too is made from its glue WOW WOW  Interlocking molecules make for glue.Oil, dust and high temp can be bad for this action.  Stuff interlocks michanicaly too.Zippers,stickers,and harpoons     come to mind.Bert 

4:02 PMDouble-A
- show quoted text -
Vacuum, like matter-energy, is neither created nor destroyed.  But both are needed for the world of

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708535 — Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias

Are all three of these that of John Baez posting under fake names, what was his last known fake name Abu something?

Why do failed scientists have a taste for posting with fake names? And is that symptomatic of failure in science? Wish they were someone else. Another person delusion?



pora...@gmail.com 	
4:11 AM (12 hours ago)


- show quoted text -
and another question : 

you boil your morning Quaker wheat 
and you forget to shut off the fire 
and your quaker 
starts to stick sharply 
 to the bottom of the pot 
so 

WHAT  IS GOING ON THERE ?? !! 
======== 
TIA 
Y.Porat 
===================== 

 


reber G=emc^2 	
3:53 PM (1 hour ago)


- show quoted text -
Eggs make great glue.It was used to make plaster stick to brick.Old time painters did their pictures on it.Go figure Bert 
 


Double-A 	
4:12 PM (53 minutes ago)


- show quoted text -
The carbon from your burnt "Quaker Wheat" can form chemical bonds with the iron in your pot.  That is what makes it stick. 

Double-A 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708550 — Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias

On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 1:09:52 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Are all three of these that of John Baez posting under fake names, what was his last known fake name Abu something?
> 
> Why do failed scientists have a taste for posting with fake names? And is that symptomatic of failure in science? Wish they were someone else. Another person delusion?
> 
> 
> 
> pora...@gmail.com 	
> 4:11 AM (12 hours ago)
> 
> 
> - show quoted text -
> and another question : 
> 
> you boil your morning Quaker wheat 
> and you forget to shut off the fire 
> and your quaker 
> starts to stick sharply 
>  to the bottom of the pot 
> so 
> 
> WHAT  IS GOING ON THERE ?? !! 
> ======== 
> TIA 
> Y.Porat 
> ===================== 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> reber G=emc^2 	
> 3:53 PM (1 hour ago)
> 
> 
> - show quoted text -
> Eggs make great glue.It was used to make plaster stick to brick.Old time painters did their pictures on it.Go figure Bert 
>  
> 
> 
> Double-A 	
> 4:12 PM (53 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> - show quoted text -
> The carbon from your burnt "Quaker Wheat" can form chemical bonds with the iron in your pot.  That is what makes it stick. 
> 
> Double-A
======================
thanks
now 
please not another fact :

while that glueing starts 

you start to hear tiny sounds of sort of 'explosions 
:
so its seems to me that in addition to your emerk
something else take pace :
apparently 
tiny quantities of water from the porridge
start to boil  and shot out !!
so /
may be 
1
the chemical composition in that bottom layer
is changing !
2 may be 
some Vacuum points there are  created ??
2
my question is 
suppose that' experiment' is done
in a space craft
will we get the same  phenomenon ??
or something else ??!
btw 
 i noticed that the'composer of this  thread 
suddenly changed 
to me Mr Archi
insead  of me !!
how come ??
what is going on there ?
============================ 
TIA
Y.POrat
===============


 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708573 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat 
>likely to be John Baez with a different alias

What's that? You want me to post John Baez's crackpot index so you can see 
how high your score is? Sure thing!

The Crackpot Index
John Baez

A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to 
physics:

    A -5 point starting credit.

    1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.

    2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.

    3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.

    5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful 
correction.

    5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results 
of a widely accepted real experiment.

    5 points for each word in all capital letters (except for those with 
defective keyboards).

    5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".

    10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally 
misguided (without good evidence).

    10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this 
were evidence of sanity.

    10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how 
long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked 
on your own.)

    10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know personally 
and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for fear that your ideas 
will be stolen.

    10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds 
any flaws in your theory.

    10 points for each new term you invent and use without properly 
defining it.

    10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, 
but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to 
express it in terms of equations".

    10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only 
a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.

    10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory 
predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they occur, or 
fails to provide a "mechanism".

    10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or 
claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided 
(without good evidence).

    10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting edge of a 
"paradigm shift".

    20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. 
(E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I 
misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)

    20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.

    20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim 
that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good 
evidence).

    20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they 
were fact.

    20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) 
ridicule accorded to your past theories.

    20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking about 
the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be Evans.)

    20 points for talking about how great your theory is, but never 
actually explaining it.

    20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".

    20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender of the 
orthodoxy".

    30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved in 
a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman was a 
closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the 
lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)

    30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was 
groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.

    30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an 
extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).

    30 points for allusions to a delay in your work while you spent time 
in an asylum, or references to the psychiatrist who tried to talk you out 
of your theory.

    40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, 
stormtroopers, or brownshirts.

    40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged 
in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved 
fame, or suchlike.

    40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a 
modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.

    40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, 
present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points 
for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your 
theories will be forced to recant.)

    50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no 
concrete testable predictions. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708575 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 7:42:36 AM UTC+3, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
> 
> >Subject: Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat 
> >likely to be John Baez with a different alias
> 
> What's that? You want me to post John Baez's crackpot index so you can see 
> how high your score is? Sure thing!
=====================
Thank you   Moroney !!
if there is someone that has to be kicked out 
i is the psycho gangster 
that was kicked out of university 
Named 
Archi plutonium Uranium  Rectum 
a pain in the neck tothis n g
====================
Y.P
========================== 


> 
> A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to 
> physics:
> 
>     A -5 point starting credit.
> 
>     1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.
> 
>     2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.
> 
>     3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
> 
>     5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful 
> correction.
> 
>     5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results 
> of a widely accepted real experiment.
> 
>     5 points for each word in all capital letters (except for those with 
> defective keyboards).
> 
>     5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".
> 
>     10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally 
> misguided (without good evidence).
> 
>     10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this 
> were evidence of sanity.
> 
>     10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how 
> long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked 
> on your own.)
> 
>     10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know personally 
> and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for fear that your ideas 
> will be stolen.
> 
>     10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds 
> any flaws in your theory.
> 
>     10 points for each new term you invent and use without properly 
> defining it.
> 
>     10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, 
> but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to 
> express it in terms of equations".
> 
>     10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only 
> a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.
> 
>     10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory 
> predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they occur, or 
> fails to provide a "mechanism".
> 
>     10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or 
> claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided 
> (without good evidence).
> 
>     10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting edge of a 
> "paradigm shift".
> 
>     20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. 
> (E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I 
> misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)
> 
>     20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.
> 
>     20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim 
> that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good 
> evidence).
> 
>     20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they 
> were fact.
> 
>     20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) 
> ridicule accorded to your past theories.
> 
>     20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking about 
> the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be Evans.)
> 
>     20 points for talking about how great your theory is, but never 
> actually explaining it.
> 
>     20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".
> 
>     20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender of the 
> orthodoxy".
> 
>     30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved in 
> a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman was a 
> closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the 
> lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)
> 
>     30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was 
> groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.
> 
>     30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an 
> extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).
> 
>     30 points for allusions to a delay in your work while you spent time 
> in an asylum, or references to the psychiatrist who tried to talk you out 
> of your theory.
> 
>     40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, 
> stormtroopers, or brownshirts.
> 
>     40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged 
> in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved 
> fame, or suchlike.
> 
>     40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a 
> modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.
> 
>     40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, 
> present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points 
> for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your 
> theories will be forced to recant.)
> 
>     50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no 
> concrete testable predictions.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706986 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Michael MOrOney WROTEN:
(snip the ACid Stalk) and push on to interesting writing

Moron MOrOney, did you live on a kibbutz ? Anything similar to your bed adn breakfast (serve grapefruits)

does Kibbutz living arouse what Westerners call stealing Re: Technion University in Israel, proud of the Porat stealing machine? Amos Yarom,Shlomit Tarem,Ari Turner,Jeff Steinhauer,Yael Shadmi

Michael Moroney WROTE:         
Oct 9 
>MM: Antisemitic Failure 

AP: 
You calling Porat antisemitic? 
- hide quoted text -


> Sci.physics has endured enough abuse, and what greater abuse is there than for some insane idiot accusing you at every turn of stealing 
> 
> 
> 
> PORAT (kick that stealing shithead out of here) 
> 
> 
> Jew Porat stealing artwork Technion Univ in Israel;; Porat stole circlon from Lord Kelvin, now trying to steal AP artwork, please Drs 
> Ophir Auslaender, Assa Auerbach tighten security 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 2:02:51 AM UTC-6, pora...@gmail.com wrote: 
>   
> > > 
> > >=========================== 
> > see my 
> > the ''chain of orbitals system ' 
> > that goes all along my unprecedented  model 
> > -------- 
> > > Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
> > > ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 
> > ============= 
> > that: 
> >  of course a model of Archi psychopath Uoranium rectum 
> > ======= 
> >  >                 ::\ ::|:: /:: 
> >                   ::\::|::/:: 
> >                       _ _ 
> >                      (:Y:) 
> >                       - - 
> > >                  ::/::|::\:: 
> > >                 ::/ ::|:: \:: 
> > > One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
> > >             . \ .  . | .   /. 
> > >            . . \. . .|. . /. . 
> > >               ..\....|.../... 
> > >                ::\:::|::/:: 
> > > ---------------      ------------- 
> > > --------------- (Y) ------------- 
> > > ---------------      -------------- 
> > >                ::/:::|::\:: 
> > >               ../....|...\... 
> > >            . . /. . .|. . \. . 
> > >             . / .  . | .   \ . 
> > > 
> > >   
> 
> > ================== 
> > Does  that dot picture   need more  prove- 
> > - that Archi is a psychopath ??!! 
> > ===== 
> > Y.P 
> > ============================ 
> 
> 
> Numerable times I have asked Technion Univ to get Porat to cite Lord Kelvin for the circlon idea-- never any response 
> 
> Numerous times Porat has accused me of stealing from him-- when that creep only has baby talk, baby talk baby talk 
> 
> What is going on here, is that the Jews of Israel are trying to figure out a formula for the age of the Internet. They lost their great formula of stealing science in the 1900s-- own the gates of science publishing.  Now they are looking for a formula that is as successful as their formula in the 1900s. 
> 
> Their Jew formula for the 1900s was gain gatekeeper-ship over all publications of science. Once they gained that, they either stole the ideas of any Gentile with good science, or they refused to publish. Witness how the Indian Bose, had to give up over 1/2 his ideas and allow Einstein to gain credit for Bose statistic. The game the Jews played was either a Jew was awarded credit or the science was not published. 
> 
> This is why a small world population of Jews-- a few hundred million out of a total of 5 billion people has something like 50% of all the awards in science-- they rig it in favor of themselves. 
> 
> The reason Jews win Olympic gold in proportion to their population size, is because, well, they cannot cheat and control the Olympic judges, therefore, they win according to population size-- a CORRECT winning. If all of a sudden, Jews won 50% of Olympic Gold Medals with their 10 million or so population, everyone would be scratching their heads-- how is this possible. But, when they take home 50% of Nobel prizes in science, not many pay any attention. 
> 
> But in science, you can take control of the gateways of publication, and that is what the Jews did in the 1900s. 
> 
> Now, let me not bad mouth Jews, for we can see that Catholics were just the opposite of Jews in history. Starting with Galileo, we see that Catholics hated science, just the opposite reaction of Jews. And, so, there is no imbalance of Catholics winning Nobel prizes in science. But then, Jews took the opposite view of science-- they adored and worshipped science, to the point where their admiration of science crippled science itself, for they smother science. Probably every Jewish boy borne in Israel, probably every one of those parents are saying to the little child-- now you grow up and be an Einstein. This smothering love of science, has made the Jews walk the extra miles to gain control over science publication, and to bias all science awards. 
> 
> Jews are in trouble now, for they cannot control the Internet. They cannot have a Jew who discovered the Atom Totality. They cannot have a Jew who discovered RockThrowing theory how humans evolved from apes. They cannot have a Jew who discovered the Real Electron is the muon. They cannot have a Jew who discovered gravity is EM. They cannot have a Jew who discovered the Fusion Barrier Principle. 
> 
> So, what are the Jews to do? How can they have a New Wave of stealing science from Gentiles? Well, that is the purpose of Porat. 
> 
> And so, this is where Porat enters the picture. 
> 
> Baby talk Porat-- and claim of some Abstract some archive and abstract that is pure fiction. 
> 
> Then, when some Gentile posts a good theory of science, posts some good idea, in steps, the Porat stealer knucklehead and claims the Gentile stole it from him. 
> 
> Many many times I have asked Technion Univ to shut Porat down because it is horrible behavior to come blasting in sci.physics with Baby Talk and nothing but Accusations of stealing. 
> 
> For over a year now Technion has done absolutely nothing. This is why this letter. Because unless Porat shapes up our shipped out. This post needs to be on the front page of sci.physics. 
> 
> Jews are having a tough time of stealing science with the Internet, the new technology of introducing true new ideas. Internet bypasses all the corrupt gatekeepers. Science before 1993 was all gatekeeper science, and Porat is the VANGUARD of how to steal. Baby talk incessant baby talk, a fictional nonexistent archive or abstract which is worthless. The moment a Gentile has a great idea-- in swoops Porat saying "you stole it from me, you stole it from me" 
> 
> This is all that Porat amounts to-- you stole it from me, you stole it from me 
> 
> Newsgroups: sci.physics 
> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:57:26 -0800 (PST) 
> 
> Subject: Technion Univ, in Israel, your Porat keeps accusing authors of 
>  stealing? See something good by others and claim they stole it 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 09:57:27 +0000 
> 
> 
> Technion Univ, in Israel, your Porat keeps accusing authors of stealing? See something good by others and claim they stole it 
> 
> I am not the only one harassed by Porat, for he recently harassed Alan Folmsbee, by claiming Alan had stole some ideas from Porat. 
> 
> Porat's sci.physics formula;; 
> 
> 1) scout around in sci.physics 
> 
> 2) if you see some author with good ideas, post in his thread that he stole those ideas from you 
> 
> 3),,, once the author dies, rejurgitate the original authors ideas saying they are all your ideas 
> 
> 4) just like Porat stole from Lord Kelvin the circlon idea, pretending as if circlon belongs to Porat, never once mentioning Lord Kelvin 
> 
> --- quoting from Internet --- 
> What is fascinating to me is that he's not the first person who has had this theory, that actually two of the great British scientists of the 19th century, including Lord Kelvin (of the Kelvin scale), as well as his colleague the great mathematician Peter Guthrie Tait, conceived of a similar theory. In the 1870s they were interested in the question which was big in 19th century psychology; what are atoms 
> 
> --- end quote --- 
> 
> Technion University, am please asking you to cut the cord on Porat posting to sci.physics. He is a menace and a constant harassment upon other authors. He accuses them of stealing, and as such is huge abuse to sci.physics. Please end his posting to sci.physics. Constant accusations of stealing has no place in sci.physics. 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, November 19, 2017 at 1:48:22 AM UTC-6, pora...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, November 19, 2017 at 5:28:34 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> > > Now on that same page of Halliday & Resnick if you take 3 pions at 135 MeV plus 1 muon you get approx 1 K-meson at 497 MeV 
> > > 
> > > There is a strong correlation of 105 MeV with other rest masses. 
> > > 
> > > AP 
> > 
> > ================================= 
> > and now the psychopath pig shit criminal 
> > is trying to steal my model 
> > of the atom and nuc 
> > instead of*** bubbling figures*** he started with 
> > energy losses stole  in genenral  from my abstract 
> > but the pig shit 
> > cannot do it all  the way because he is lacking the 3D ability that i had 
> > 25 years ago 
> > not the creative imagination that  i have 
> > he still   din t stole the chain of orbitals system 
> > etc etc etc 
> > but dont worry he will try doing it later 
> > but it want help him 
> > because my model is 
> > documented in Google 
> > and my American   copyrighted  book 
> > from 1993 !! 
> > so just see 
> > the following link 
> > and you will   get the real much  far going  original (only abstract !!of it )!!! 
> > 
> > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> > -- 
> > not to mention the say the 
> > helix model of the photon and why and how  helix !! 
> > and how it creates both 
> > 1 
> > enery 
> > 2 
> > masses /particles 
> > etc etc 
> > 
> > TIA 
> > Eng 
> > Y.Porat 
> > ================================== 
> 
> Another time he accuses Alan Folmsbee 
> 
> > > Porat:: ============================ 
> little psychopath senile pig shit gagster 
> Archi  plutonium uranium ERECTOM ETC 
> 
> I AM STEALING FROM ALAN ??!! 
> 
> DID ANYONE EVER SEE SOMETING MORE DETAILED AND ACURATE 
> AS I CHOSE TO PRESENT (RANDOMLY IRON 56 !!??? 
> just to explain my system in general 
> 
> 
> in my site 
> Google 
> 'the  y porat model an abstract ' 
> 0 
> TO SHOW /EXPLAIN MY  HISTORIC UNPR4CEDENTED SYSTEM FINDINGS 
> ABOUT THE 
> 3D STRUCTURE OF ATOMS AND NUCLIE 
> and chose just for instance 
> iron 56!! 
> my model is not all about 
> iron 56 
> it is all along the periodic table !!! 
> 
> did Alan did it !! 
> did it before me ?? 
> it is from 1993! 
> 
> how old was Alan  in 1993 ??!! 
> 
> ===== 
> next!! 
>  to human sane decent people 
> ======== 
> Y.Porat 
> ========== 
> 
> Another ACCUSATION OF STEALING 
> 
> On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:42:26 PM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote: 
> 
> > ================================ 
> > The crock 'Archimedes'   
> > is trying to steal from me 
> > the 
> > ''Y Circlon mechanism'' 
> > ====== 
> > 
> > TIA 
> > Y.Porat 
> > ==================================== 
> 
> --- 
> 
> 
>            |\__/| 
>           /     \ 
>          /_.~ ~,_\ 
>             \@/ 
> 
> 
> 
> Technion University physics dept Israel 
> 
> Amos Yarom 
> 
> Shlomit Tarem 
> 
> Ari Turner 
> 
> Jeff Steinhauer 
> 
> Yael Shadmi 
> 
> Yoav Sagi 
> 
> Yoram Rozen 
> 
> Shlomo Razamat 
> 
> Daniel Podolsky 
> 
> Netanel Lindner 
> 
> Yakov Krasik 
> 
> Amit Keren 
> 
> Amit Kanigel 
> 
> David Gershoni 
> 
> Boris Blok 
> 
> Oren Bergman 
> 
> Ophir Auslaender 
> 
> Assa Auerbach 
> 
> Itai Arad 
> 
> Eric Akkermans 
> 
> Joan Adler 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         * 
>    /*** 
> 
>   *    *   PonyMovies 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706926

On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 10:57:05 PM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 8:05:38 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk, never any science talk
> > 
> > Porat steals the circulon from Lord Kelvin and mathematician Tait and never ever refers to either one.
> > 
> > Now the kleptomaniac stealing cuss tries to steal from others in sci.physics.
> > 
> > Kick that worthless stealing shithead out of sci.physics
> > 
> > There is never ever any substance of physics to any of that insane Porat posts-- always and only -- talk of stealing.
> > 
> > Kick the shithead out.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> ===========================
> little Nazi psychopath criminal !!
> my findings are from 1993
> anyone could see it a long decades
> at my abstract  
> all the other  pig shit that you post
> i leave for you 
> 
> anyone could see my abstract 
> that is only an *abstract  **of a book !!!
> ====
> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> 
> plus all my innovating findings 
> that i publish here along decades!!
> even just to this very time/days  
> about all  push  forces ''
> that can be explained only by my Y circlon mechanism
> and not only by stealing pictures
> and showing the original form 25 years ago 
> like
>  
> no empty space !and prove it 
> no curved space !
> etc etc etc 
> yet unlike that psychopath
> i do it short and 'to the point ' 
> ====
> ATB
> Y.POrat 
> =========================================


At least you seem to have a consistent theory, Porat.  All I ever see in Archi's posts are totally unbelievable far flung crap theories of all kinds.  Doesn't seem to me there is anything in them worth reading.  Now he seems to be trying to call more attention to himself by attacking others in this group.  That is really desperate of him! 

Double-A

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706969

On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 12:59:18 AM UTC+3, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, October 8, 2018 at 10:57:05 PM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 8:05:38 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk, never any science talk
> > > 
> > > Porat steals the circulon from Lord Kelvin and mathematician Tait and never ever refers to either one.
> > > 
> > > Now the kleptomaniac stealing cuss tries to steal from others in sci.physics.
> > > 
> > > Kick that worthless stealing shithead out of sci.physics
> > > 
> > > There is never ever any substance of physics to any of that insane Porat posts-- always and only -- talk of stealing.
> > > 
> > > Kick the shithead out.
> > > 
> > > AP
> > 
> > ===========================
> > little Nazi psychopath criminal !!
> > my findings are from 1993
> > anyone could see it a long decades
> > at my abstract  
> > all the other  pig shit that you post
> > i leave for you 
> > 
> > anyone could see my abstract 
> > that is only an *abstract  **of a book !!!
> > ====
> > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> > 
> > plus all my innovating findings 
> > that i publish here along decades!!
> > even just to this very time/days  
> > about all  push  forces ''
> > that can be explained only by my Y circlon mechanism
> > and not only by stealing pictures
> > and showing the original form 25 years ago 
> > like
> >  
> > no empty space !and prove it 
> > no curved space !
> > etc etc etc 
> > yet unlike that psychopath
> > i do it short and 'to the point ' 
> > ====
> > ATB
> > Y.POrat 
> > =========================================
> 
> 
> At least you seem to have a consistent theory, Porat.  All I ever see in Archi's posts are totally unbelievable far flung crap theories of all kinds.  Doesn't seem to me there is anything in them worth reading.  Now he seems to be trying to call more attention to himself by attacking others in this group.  That is really desperate of him! 
> 
> Double-A
======================
thank you my  friend A A 
-=====
Y.P
===========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#706941

shut up idiot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708576

On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 8:57:05 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 8:05:38 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk, never any science talk
> > 
> > Porat steals the circulon from Lord Kelvin and mathematician Tait and never ever refers to either one.
> > 
> > Now the kleptomaniac stealing cuss tries to steal from others in sci.physics.
> > 
> > Kick that worthless stealing shithead out of sci.physics
> > 
> > There is never ever any substance of physics to any of that insane Porat posts-- always and only -- talk of stealing.
> > 
> > Kick the shithead out.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> ===========================
> little Nazi psychopath criminal !!
> my findings are from 1993
> anyone could see it a long decades
> at my abstract  
> all the other  pig shit that you post
> i leave for you 
> 
> anyone could see my abstract 
> that is only an *abstract  **of a book !!!
> ====
> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> 
> plus all my innovating findings 
> that i publish here along decades!!
> even just to this very time/days  
> about all  push  forces ''
> that can be explained only by my Y circlon mechanism
> and not only by stealing pictures
> and showing the original form 25 years ago 
> like
>  
> no empty space !and prove it 
> no curved space !
> etc etc etc 
> yet unlike that psychopath
> i do it short and 'to the point ' 
> ====
> ATB
> Y.POrat 
> =========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708759

The stealing machine


4:15 AMypor...@gmail.com
- show quoted text -
Thank you 
poor psychopath 
ARCIMEDES  PLUTONIUM URANIUM RCTUM 
did anyone in history ever called himself as that ?? 

for promoting me 

I WAS** NOT** KIKRD OUT OF MY   UNIVERITY!! 
YOU WAS !!! 
2 
anyone can/could  see my abstract 
and my innovative  posts along many years here 
is it something similar to what that psychopath does ?? 
=============== 
TIA 
to sane human   beings 
Y.Porat 
========================= 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708777

Learn English, you puppy-hurting, jaywalking, trailer-
dwelling fried-chicken-neck gobbling tiny-dicked dog-
porking pus-encrusted urine-soaked cross-eyed syphilitic
gap-toothed loser.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#708791

On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 5:16:03 PM UTC+3, Pete Smith wrote:
> Learn English, you puppy-hurting, jaywalking, trailer-
> dwelling fried-chicken-neck gobbling tiny-dicked dog-
> porking pus-encrusted urine-soaked cross-eyed syphilitic
> gap-toothed loser.
===========================
(:-)
oh  !!!   now I know is that poor 
miserable coward anonymous  pig shit psychopath 
Smith ''
===
Y.P
======================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709037 — science is not baby talk-- and Porat is nothing but baby talk--Porat teaches the young to steal science, not do science---- Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon

Porat teaches the young to steal science, not do science---- Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon
science is not baby talk-- and Porat is nothing but baby talk--

Porat teaches the young to steal science, not do science---- Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon 

This worthless Israeli sci.physics crank only teaches stealing of science 
- hide quoted text -


7:00 PMypor...@gmail.com wrote 
- show quoted text - 
==================== 
thank you A A 
a good question : 
now see google 
''THE Y CIRCLON MECHANISM' !! 
it is not space that is curving 

it is something else that is curving 
stem out from  any  mass !! 
--- 
http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
---------------------- 
at its appendix !! 
===== 
from 1993 !! 
=== 
TIA 
Y.Porat 
=================== 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709370

On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 10:07:10 AM UTC-5, ypor...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 5:16:03 PM UTC+3, Pete Smith wrote:
> > Learn English, you puppy-hurting, jaywalking, trailer-
> > dwelling fried-chicken-neck gobbling tiny-dicked dog-
> > porking pus-encrusted urine-soaked cross-eyed syphilitic
> > gap-toothed loser.
> ===========================
> (:-)
> oh  !!!   now I know is that poor 
> miserable coward anonymous  pig shit psychopath 
> Smith ''
> ===
> Y.P
> ======================


On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 5:33:52 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote:
> Den tisdag 23 oktober 2018 kl. 11:22:46 UTC+2 skrev 
> 
> Hey idiot!
> 
> PROVE things, not DEMONSTRATE somoe examples.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709564 — Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk

Maybe the prevalence of stealing by Jewish scientists comes from the examples Einstein showed them, set for them, and Porat is a modern day version --

Write and publish about E=mc^2 without citing one single source, a massive past history source.

So that when a modern Jewish scientist does science, he/she looks at Einstein and follows what Einstein did-- never list or mention anyone who worked on the topic before. Steal it all, steal it all.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709579 — Re: Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk

On Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 5:52:30 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Maybe the prevalence of stealing by Jewish scientists comes from the examples Einstein showed them, set for them, and Porat is a modern day version --
> 
> Write and publish about E=mc^2 without citing one single source, a massive past history source.
> 
> So that when a modern Jewish scientist does science, he/she looks at Einstein and follows what Einstein did-- never list or mention anyone who worked on the topic before. Steal it all, steal it all.
> 
> AP
======================
thank you  poor   little nasty  psychopath 
for promoting me
===
Y.Porat
==========================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709718

More baby talk, never any actual physics, never any math, only -- stealing and accusations of stealing is Porat. Time to kick this anti-science creep out of sci.physics


ypor...@gmail.com 	wrote:
Oct 25 (5 hours ago)

======================================================== 

TIA 

old copyright 
Y.Porat 
====================== 


On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 12:57:05 AM UTC-5, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 8:05:38 AM UTC+3, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk, never any science talk
> > 
> > Porat steals the circulon from Lord Kelvin and mathematician Tait and never ever refers to either one.
> > 
> > Now the kleptomaniac stealing cuss tries to steal from others in sci.physics.
> > 
> > Kick that worthless stealing shithead out of sci.physics
> > 
> > There is never ever any substance of physics to any of that insane Porat posts-- always and only -- talk of stealing.
> > 
> > Kick the shithead out.
> > 
> > AP
> 
> ===========================
> little Nazi psychopath criminal !!
> my findings are from 1993
> anyone could see it a long decades
> at my abstract  
> all the other  pig shit that you post
> i leave for you 
> 
> anyone could see my abstract 
> that is only an *abstract  **of a book !!!
> ====
> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract 
> 
> plus all my innovating findings 
> that i publish here along decades!!
> even just to this very time/days  
> about all  push  forces ''
> that can be explained only by my Y circlon mechanism
> and not only by stealing pictures
> and showing the original form 25 years ago 
> like
>  
> no empty space !and prove it 
> no curved space !
> etc etc etc 
> yet unlike that psychopath
> i do it short and 'to the point ' 
> ====
> ATB
> Y.POrat 
> =========================================

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web