Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #708573

Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Show all headers | View raw

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat 
>likely to be John Baez with a different alias

What's that? You want me to post John Baez's crackpot index so you can see 
how high your score is? Sure thing!

The Crackpot Index
John Baez

A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to 
physics:

    A -5 point starting credit.

    1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.

    2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.

    3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.

    5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful 
correction.

    5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results 
of a widely accepted real experiment.

    5 points for each word in all capital letters (except for those with 
defective keyboards).

    5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".

    10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally 
misguided (without good evidence).

    10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this 
were evidence of sanity.

    10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how 
long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked 
on your own.)

    10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know personally 
and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for fear that your ideas 
will be stolen.

    10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds 
any flaws in your theory.

    10 points for each new term you invent and use without properly 
defining it.

    10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, 
but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to 
express it in terms of equations".

    10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only 
a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.

    10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory 
predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they occur, or 
fails to provide a "mechanism".

    10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or 
claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided 
(without good evidence).

    10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting edge of a 
"paradigm shift".

    20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot index. 
(E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers" or saying that I 
misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)

    20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.

    20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim 
that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good 
evidence).

    20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they 
were fact.

    20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined) 
ridicule accorded to your past theories.

    20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking about 
the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be Evans.)

    20 points for talking about how great your theory is, but never 
actually explaining it.

    20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".

    20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender of the 
orthodoxy".

    30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved in 
a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman was a 
closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the 
lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)

    30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was 
groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.

    30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an 
extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).

    30 points for allusions to a delay in your work while you spent time 
in an asylum, or references to the psychiatrist who tried to talk you out 
of your theory.

    40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, 
stormtroopers, or brownshirts.

    40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged 
in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved 
fame, or suchlike.

    40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a 
modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.

    40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, 
present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points 
for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your 
theories will be forced to recant.)

    50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no 
concrete testable predictions. 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 22:05 -0700
  Porat-- a Jewish stealing machine Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 22:10 -0700
  Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 22:57 -0700
    Is Porat the vanguard of how Jews steal science from Gentiles in the future-- nonexistent abstracts, baby talk, and only accusations of stealing Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-08 23:47 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-08 23:48 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 07:15 +0000
      kibo wants to steal Technion University physics dept Israel Amos Yarom,Shlomit Tarem,Ari Turner,Jeff Steinhauer,Yael Shadmi,Yoav Sagi,Yoram Rozen,Shlomo Razamat,Daniel Podolsky,Netanel Lindner,Yakov Krasik,Amit Keren,Amit Kanigel Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 00:32 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-09 14:45 +0000
          How did Porat make his living? Didn't he post that he stole bridges in Israel. But where did he sell them? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 13:50 -0700
          Terence Tao must believe in Moroney's failed ellipse proof is a conic, for Tao is silent// but does Tao also think 938 is 12% short of 945 ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-09 21:50 -0700
            Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-10 05:32 +0000
              Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 15:39 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-11 01:45 +0000
                Yea, Porat stealing Moroney (frankly he was worthless in science) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 22:06 -0700
                Re: Yea, Porat stealing Moroney (frankly he was worthless in science) poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-11 06:41 -0700
                if porat is a Israeli computer program, you have to make it stop accusing others of stealing, and footnote source Lord Kelvin, Tait for circlon Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-11 11:22 -0700
                endless baby talk porat and then endless stealing and accusations of stealing, that is what this nutjob teaches youngsters Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-12 19:35 -0700
                sci.physics has endured 5 or more years of this stealing creep and time to kick him out Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 13:18 -0700
                Re: sci.physics has endured 5 or more years of this stealing creep and time to kick him out Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-13 17:48 -0700
                Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-14 10:50 -0700
                Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 11:12 -0700
                Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-15 14:15 -0700
                Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-16 15:09 -0700
                Re: Baez crackpot list-- thousands of fake names Re: Porat likely to be John Baez with a different alias poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 17:26 -0700
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-17 04:42 +0000
                Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 21:53 -0700
          Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-10 02:50 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-09 14:59 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-09 22:21 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Nate Higgers <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-09 16:45 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-16 21:53 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-18 02:36 -0700
      Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Pete Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-18 07:16 -0700
        Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-18 08:07 -0700
          science is not baby talk-- and Porat is nothing but baby talk--Porat teaches the young to steal science, not do science---- Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-20 14:30 -0700
          Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-23 12:28 -0700
            Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-24 19:52 -0700
              Re: Einstein stole E=mc^2, stole 1/2 of Bose statistics, never cited Hilbert or Levi Cevita math Re: kick-out.. Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk yporat08@gmail.com - 2018-10-25 00:05 -0700
    Re: kick-out that insane stealing cocksucker Porat from sci.physics-- constant accusation of stealing, constant stealing from others and never any physics-- only baby talk Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-26 02:49 -0700

csiph-web