Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #704541 > unrolled thread
| Started by | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-25 09:47 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-26 10:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 09:47 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-25 14:55 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 17:59 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 17:54 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 18:02 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 18:07 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-25 18:10 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-26 00:47 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:34 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-26 10:20 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-26 10:28 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:47 +0000
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-27 17:53 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-27 18:00 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-28 03:13 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-28 21:17 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-28 23:44 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-29 00:18 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-29 05:47 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND Greg Smith <invalid@example.com> - 2018-09-30 17:02 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-30 18:48 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 17:54 +0000
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-09-28 12:29 -0700
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:45 +0000
Re: WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE AROUND SUN ....AND "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-09-26 10:20 -0700
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 18:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a1077124-911e-495a-8ee4-3a032d7bf3c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #705437 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 3:03:03 AM UTC+3, Greg Smith wrote: > You are non-brain person. Go eat goat bottom. ======================= (:-) thank you coward anonymous piggy what is your real identity ?? it seems that i am threatening you and your monkey business with my innovations speak physics arguments !! hired gangster criminal against mankind but it want help you i am marching ahead ============================= next!! to human responsible beings! Y.Porat ======================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 18:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1964b666-0901-4c0b-8e91-51fd47894d00@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #705453 |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 4:49:00 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 3:03:03 AM UTC+3, Greg Smith wrote: > > You are non-brain person. Go eat goat bottom. > > ======================= > (:-) > thank you coward anonymous piggy > what is your real identity ?? > > it seems that i am threatening you > and your monkey business > with my innovations > > speak physics arguments !! > hired gangster > criminal against mankind > > but it want help you > i am marching ahead > ============================= > next!! > to human responsible beings! > Y.Porat > ====================== space has no curvature -- and no 'schmervature' !!! if forces are created - it is all Mass 'job' !! indeed not easy and ''obvious'' to understand but thats is ! .. .in order to understand it you have to be a bit more than a parrot ! =========================== Y.P ============================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 17:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <polpth$o3d$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704966 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 6:47:53 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 8:20:35 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 7:34:39 PM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 9:47:05 AM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE OF SPACE AROUND SUN ? >>>>>>> ANd WHAT IS IT AROUND EARTH ?? >>>>>>> (:-) ..... >>>>>>> ==================> > > > TIA >>>>>>> Y.POrat >>>>>> >>>>>> The diameter of the Sun. >>>>>> The diameter of the Earth... >>>>>> Gravity is a sphere closed curve. >>>>> >>>>> Nothing goes in a straight line,The universe is a spinning sphere.All >>>>> that it contains spins round and round.Spin creates inertia and curving >>>>> of space.Inertia and gravity are two sides to the same coin.In 1952 >>>>> Einstein and I talked about this.We agreed this was reality.It is the >>>>> heart of his GR.So many years ago,but this thinking will always be in Google.Bert >>>> ======================> why do you talk so much ??!! >>>> >>>> see >>>> ==================================================> MASS IS THE CREATOR >>>> OF ALL FORCES INCLUDING GRAVITY ! >>>> ======================================================> 2 >>>> there is inu universe some unknown yet >>>> basic particles that move''naturally' >>>> in curved lines >>>> and they make all forces >>>> and do all pull forces - >>>> -by mutual colissin and recycling >>>> that is how ''it was born ever since >>>> if you like a basic assumption >>>> that has to be developed >>>> see >>>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract >>>> ================> at its appendix !! >>>> ------------------ >>>> TIA >>>> Y.Porat >>>> >>> ============and if so no need for the idiotic assumption of >>> curved space '' >>> no curvature and no schmervature of space >>> but >>> natural curved motion of those quotes >>> 'y circlons' >>> that can explain all of it >>> ====TIA >>> Y.P >>> ==================> >> You keep saying, qualitative before quantitative. But keep in mind that >> explanation in science requires proof of viability by quantitative match >> against measurement. Until you can PROVE that the circling idea gets the >> numbers right, then your claim that they can explain it all will be >> dismissed as an empty and unsubstantiated claim. The onus is on you to >> provide that quantitative proof of viability. No one will give you credit >> for anything of value until you do. >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > ==================================Bod > the only positive think i can say about you > sd that > you are not indifferent against me (:-) > ie > something at the 'back of your mind'tell you > that that y p > is one of the most interesting chaps in this ng (:-) > and i indirectly thank you for that > 2 > to tell me that 'i am not quantitative' is ... > ... > i don t want to deteriorate our personal relations > and say > you cheat !!!! > or alternatively you are blind !!! > > here it is again my abstract > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstact > > pease look mre attentivly there > and tell me please : > > DO YOU SEE ANY FIGURES THERE ??!! For your string of orbital idea? Yes. For circlons and gravity? No. > ''hadron ballance ' > losses calculations rt each connection point > angles of deviation > etc etc > many **figures** that i kept secret only for myself Scientist publish their calculations. This may seem odd to you, but scientists do not withhold their calculations out of fear that someone will steal them. And in fact, hiding calculations is one of the fastest ways to get completely ignored in the scientific world. > > now pease note > wHat you see there is > ONLY AN ABSTRACT OF A BOOK 150 DENSE PAGES !! > ***unprecedented* unique explanation > about the > 'geologic clock' > archoplic clock ' > etc etc > so > btw Bodkin or whatever is your real name ...! > (actually i have a guess what is your real name ..) > i can 'smell' people from thousand of kilometers .. > so > would you like to be the publisher of that book ??... I have no way to do that. I’m not a publisher. This may come as a shock to you, but physicists PAY to have their calculations published in journals. > > that might be ''the ''deal of your life'' ... > > TIA > Y.Porat > ================================================ > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e0961bb0-3eb3-4c7b-b344-767037298552@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #705063 |
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 8:55:03 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 6:47:53 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 8:20:35 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 7:34:39 PM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 9:47:05 AM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>> WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE OF SPACE AROUND SUN ? > >>>>>>> ANd WHAT IS IT AROUND EARTH ?? > >>>>>>> (:-) ..... > >>>>>>> ==================> > > > TIA > >>>>>>> Y.POrat > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The diameter of the Sun. > >>>>>> The diameter of the Earth... > >>>>>> Gravity is a sphere closed curve. > >>>>> > >>>>> Nothing goes in a straight line,The universe is a spinning sphere.All > >>>>> that it contains spins round and round.Spin creates inertia and curving > >>>>> of space.Inertia and gravity are two sides to the same coin.In 1952 > >>>>> Einstein and I talked about this.We agreed this was reality.It is the > >>>>> heart of his GR.So many years ago,but this thinking will always be in Google.Bert > >>>> ======================> why do you talk so much ??!! > >>>> > >>>> see > >>>> ==================================================> MASS IS THE CREATOR > >>>> OF ALL FORCES INCLUDING GRAVITY ! > >>>> ======================================================> 2 > >>>> there is inu universe some unknown yet > >>>> basic particles that move''naturally' > >>>> in curved lines > >>>> and they make all forces > >>>> and do all pull forces - > >>>> -by mutual colissin and recycling > >>>> that is how ''it was born ever since > >>>> if you like a basic assumption > >>>> that has to be developed > >>>> see > >>>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract > >>>> ================> at its appendix !! > >>>> ------------------ > >>>> TIA > >>>> Y.Porat > >>>> > >>> ============and if so no need for the idiotic assumption of > >>> curved space '' > >>> no curvature and no schmervature of space > >>> but > >>> natural curved motion of those quotes > >>> 'y circlons' > >>> that can explain all of it > >>> ====TIA > >>> Y.P > >>> ==================> > >> You keep saying, qualitative before quantitative. But keep in mind that > >> explanation in science requires proof of viability by quantitative match > >> against measurement. Until you can PROVE that the circling idea gets the > >> numbers right, then your claim that they can explain it all will be > >> dismissed as an empty and unsubstantiated claim. The onus is on you to > >> provide that quantitative proof of viability. No one will give you credit > >> for anything of value until you do. > >> > >> -- > >> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables > > ==================================Bod > > the only positive think i can say about you > > sd that > > you are not indifferent against me (:-) > > ie > > something at the 'back of your mind'tell you > > that that y p > > is one of the most interesting chaps in this ng (:-) > > and i indirectly thank you for that > > 2 > > to tell me that 'i am not quantitative' is ... > > ... > > i don t want to deteriorate our personal relations > > and say > > you cheat !!!! > > or alternatively you are blind !!! > > > > here it is again my abstract > > > > http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstact > > > > pease look mre attentivly there > > and tell me please : > > > > DO YOU SEE ANY FIGURES THERE ??!! > > For your string of orbital idea? Yes. For circlons and gravity? No. ===================== for my 'chain of orbitals' you are right now about Y Circlon'' of course i never thought about it quantitatively it is a fantastic novelty so how can i have calculations ? i thought that about my nuclear model : dont you think that it is a **life time work** for itself ?? for one person ??!! i worked about it,lets say about 10 years sometimes day and much of the night !! parallel you my day job as a bridge engineer ... now about my y Circlon dot you think that it is something once in a lifetime even just the idea !! because it is some .sort of divine enlightenment (with all the modesty) it stated by 100 percent conviction that space is nothing !! and if so can do '' nothing!! and if so i started to look for some another alternative that will be tangible may be the Faraday experiment with the magnetyt was ''at the back of my mind along decades ! 2] i was convinced that basic particles ar sort of 100 percent elastic entities with 100 percent collision moment !! or else i cannot survive forever !! you see knowledge/study plus intuition !! that was occupying i most of my free time i was capture ' by physics from age aay 14 read about the grate people of science 3 now you suggest that i will start all over from beginning ay my age ??(80) you arr right without quantitative work it will not be accepted as science alli cando now is saring collecting any piece of information to go on with it but that is not east itis a job for decades may be in collaborations with others etc but asi isayed above what i achieved until now is a life time job TIA Y.P ============================== > > ''hadron ballance ' > > losses calculations rt each connection point > > angles of deviation > > etc etc > > many **figures** that i kept secret only for myself > > Scientist publish their calculations. > This may seem odd to you, but scientists do not withhold their calculations > out of fear that someone will steal them. And in fact, hiding calculations > is one of the fastest ways to get completely ignored in the scientific > world. > > > > > > ONLY AN ABSTRACT OF A BOOK 150 DENSE PAGES !! > > ***unprecedented* unique explanation > > about the > > 'geologic clock' > > archoplic clock ' > > etc etc > > so > > btw Bodkin or whatever is your real name ...! > > (actually i have a guess what is your real name ..) > > i can 'smell' people from thousand of kilometers .. > > so > > would you like to be the publisher of that book ??... > > I have no way to do that. I’m not a publisher. > > This may come as a shock to you, but physicists PAY to have their > calculations published in journals. > > > > > that might be ''the ''deal of your life'' ... > > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > ================================================ > > > > > > -- >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-28 23:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pomeek$1otp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #705078 |
<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 8:55:03 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 6:47:53 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 8:20:35 PM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 7:34:39 PM UTC+3, reber G=emc^2 wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 5:54:06 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 9:47:05 AM UTC-7, pora...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF CURVATURE OF SPACE AROUND SUN ? >>>>>>>>> ANd WHAT IS IT AROUND EARTH ?? >>>>>>>>> (:-) ..... >>>>>>>>> ==================> > > > TIA >>>>>>>>> Y.POrat >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The diameter of the Sun. >>>>>>>> The diameter of the Earth... >>>>>>>> Gravity is a sphere closed curve. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing goes in a straight line,The universe is a spinning sphere.All >>>>>>> that it contains spins round and round.Spin creates inertia and curving >>>>>>> of space.Inertia and gravity are two sides to the same coin.In 1952 >>>>>>> Einstein and I talked about this.We agreed this was reality.It is the >>>>>>> heart of his GR.So many years ago,but this thinking will always be in Google.Bert >>>>>> ======================> why do you talk so much ??!! >>>>>> >>>>>> see >>>>>> ==================================================> MASS IS THE CREATOR >>>>>> OF ALL FORCES INCLUDING GRAVITY ! >>>>>> ======================================================> 2 >>>>>> there is inu universe some unknown yet >>>>>> basic particles that move''naturally' >>>>>> in curved lines >>>>>> and they make all forces >>>>>> and do all pull forces - >>>>>> -by mutual colissin and recycling >>>>>> that is how ''it was born ever since >>>>>> if you like a basic assumption >>>>>> that has to be developed >>>>>> see >>>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract >>>>>> ================> at its appendix !! >>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>> TIA >>>>>> Y.Porat >>>>>> >>>>> ============and if so no need for the idiotic assumption of >>>>> curved space '' >>>>> no curvature and no schmervature of space >>>>> but >>>>> natural curved motion of those quotes >>>>> 'y circlons' >>>>> that can explain all of it >>>>> ====TIA >>>>> Y.P >>>>> ==================> >>>> You keep saying, qualitative before quantitative. But keep in mind that >>>> explanation in science requires proof of viability by quantitative match >>>> against measurement. Until you can PROVE that the circling idea gets the >>>> numbers right, then your claim that they can explain it all will be >>>> dismissed as an empty and unsubstantiated claim. The onus is on you to >>>> provide that quantitative proof of viability. No one will give you credit >>>> for anything of value until you do. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin Maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> ==================================Bod >>> the only positive think i can say about you >>> sd that >>> you are not indifferent against me (:-) >>> ie >>> something at the 'back of your mind'tell you >>> that that y p >>> is one of the most interesting chaps in this ng (:-) >>> and i indirectly thank you for that >>> 2 >>> to tell me that 'i am not quantitative' is ... >>> ... >>> i don t want to deteriorate our personal relations >>> and say >>> you cheat !!!! >>> or alternatively you are blind !!! >>> >>> here it is again my abstract >>> >>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstact >>> >>> pease look mre attentivly there >>> and tell me please : >>> >>> DO YOU SEE ANY FIGURES THERE ??!! >> >> For your string of orbital idea? Yes. For circlons and gravity? No. > ====================for my 'chain of orbitals' > you are right > now > about Y Circlon'' of course > i never thought about it quantitatively > it is a fantastic novelty > so how can i have calculations ? Until you do, it will get no attention. > > i thought that about my nuclear model : > dont you think that it is a **life time work** > for itself ?? for one person ??!! > i worked about it,lets say about 10 years > sometimes > day and much of the night !! > parallel you my day job > as a bridge engineer ... > now about my y Circlon > dot you think that it is > something once in a lifetime > even just the idea !! > because it is some .sort of > divine enlightenment (with all the modesty) > it stated by > 100 percent conviction that space is nothing !! > and if so > can do '' nothing!! > and if so i started to look for some another alternative that will be tangible > may be the Faraday experiment with the magnetyt > was ''at the back of my mind along decades ! > 2] > i was convinced that basic particles > ar sort of 100 percent elastic entities > with 100 percent collision moment !! > or else i cannot survive forever !! > > you see knowledge/study plus intuition !! > that was occupying i most of my free time > i was capture ' by physics from age aay 14 > read about the grate people of science > 3 > now you suggest that i will start all over from beginning ay my age ??(80) > you arr right > without quantitative work > it will not be accepted as science > alli cando now > is saring collecting any piece of information > to go on with it > but that is not east > itis a job for decades > may be in collaborations with others > etc > but asi isayed above > what i achieved until now > is a life time job > TIA > Y.P > ============================= >>> ''hadron ballance ' >>> losses calculations rt each connection point >>> angles of deviation >>> etc etc >>> many **figures** that i kept secret only for myself >> >> Scientist publish their calculations. >> This may seem odd to you, but scientists do not withhold their calculations >> out of fear that someone will steal them. And in fact, hiding calculations >> is one of the fastest ways to get completely ignored in the scientific >> world. >> >>> >> >>> ONLY AN ABSTRACT OF A BOOK 150 DENSE PAGES !! >>> ***unprecedented* unique explanation >>> about the >>> 'geologic clock' >>> archoplic clock ' >>> etc etc >>> so >>> btw Bodkin or whatever is your real name ...! >>> (actually i have a guess what is your real name ..) >>> i can 'smell' people from thousand of kilometers .. >>> so >>> would you like to be the publisher of that book ??... >> >> I have no way to do that. Im not a publisher. >> >> This may come as a shock to you, but physicists PAY to have their >> calculations published in journals. >> >>> >>> that might be ''the ''deal of your life'' ... >>> >>> TIA >>> Y.Porat >>> ===============================================> > >> >> >> >> -- >> > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pogf5r$o86$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704702 |
"homo-reber G=emc^2" <herbertgay-lazier0@gmail.com> wrote: "Nothing goes in a straight line, especially not when Bert does this: <http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg> Inertia and gravity are two sides to the same coin, just like in Bert's case when Bert's Face-shitting and Bert's criminal Graveyard Vandalism are the 2 sides of the same coin". Bert > "In 1952 Einstein's-Bobble head that I have mounted onto the lid of the bucket that I shit into in my Van, talked about this. <https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51eLvJ%2BGpZL._SY300_.jpg> > The bobble-head and me agreed this was reality.It is the heart of "Glaziers' Rant" ( = GR.) So many years ago, but this thinking will always be in Google.Bert.. where web-searches says: > --- Swine Glazier G=EMC^2 Cretin ---- 3'327'833 hits & rising --- TurdBert mooch reber Face-shitter ---- 3'947'953 hits & rising --- Glazier criminal Graveyard Vandal ---- 3'653'334 hits & rising > > PS: SwineBert, listen: checK daily for the posts that appear in your thread: __Re: Where is Hanson? I miss Him___ <snicker> <chucle> <chortle> ...ROTFLMAO... O ya
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web