Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #690582 > unrolled thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
Last post2018-07-01 14:06 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 103 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

#691770

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
Message-ID<bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>
In reply to#691769
On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>
>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>
>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
>> people.
>>
> 
> Is it?
> 
no if anything its more insulting

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691771

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3599d2c7c540821f994074@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#691770
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> 
> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> > 
> > 
> >>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> >>>
> >>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> >>
> >> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> >> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
> >> people.
> >>
> > 
> > Is it?
> > 
> no if anything its more insulting

It is?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691772

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
Message-ID<bcm1k3.9b7.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#691771
On 2018-06-24 5:10 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>>
>>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>>
>>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
>>>> people.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it?
>>>
>> no if anything its more insulting
> 
> It is?
> 
blow me

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691775

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3599d563b72e97c2994077@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#691772
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bcm1k3.9b7.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> 
> On 2018-06-24 5:10 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> > says...
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >>> @gmail.invalid says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> >>>>
> >>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> >>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
> >>>> people.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Is it?
> >>>
> >> no if anything its more insulting
> > 
> > It is?
> > 
> blow me

Buy me a pony.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691776

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
Message-ID<bcm2e2.9b7.19.18@news.alt.net>
In reply to#691775
On 2018-06-24 5:21 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bcm1k3.9b7.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-06-24 5:10 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>>>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it?
>>>>>
>>>> no if anything its more insulting
>>>
>>> It is?
>>>
>> blow me
> 
> Buy me a pony.
> 
i guess i could christ knows you could never afford one

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691778

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3599e759b8460c2899407b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#691776
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bcm2e2.9b7.19.18@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> 
> On 2018-06-24 5:21 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!  In article <bcm1k3.9b7.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> > says...
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> On 2018-06-24 5:10 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>> Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> >>> says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> >>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> >>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> >>>>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
> >>>>>> people.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it?
> >>>>>
> >>>> no if anything its more insulting
> >>>
> >>> It is?
> >>>
> >> blow me
> > 
> > Buy me a pony.
> > 
> i guess i could christ knows you could never afford one

Why use MY money?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691781

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
Message-ID<bcm9f7.m7m.19.7@news.alt.net>
In reply to#691778
On 2018-06-24 6:38 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bcm2e2.9b7.19.18@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On 2018-06-24 5:21 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <bcm1k3.9b7.19.4@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
>>> says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-06-24 5:10 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <bcm08u.qoj.19.11@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2018-06-24 4:48 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>>>> Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>>>>>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
>>>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> no if anything its more insulting
>>>>>
>>>>> It is?
>>>>>
>>>> blow me
>>>
>>> Buy me a pony.
>>>
>> i guess i could christ knows you could never afford one
> 
> Why use MY money?
> 
get some first

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691773

FromTrevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Date2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
Message-ID<fpaqlvFbgm4U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#691762
On 25/06/2018 7:50 AM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> 
>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>> read it's posts.
>>>
>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>
>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> 
> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
> people.
> 

**It is pretty much impossible to avoid insulting people in this method 
of communication. Some would be more insulted if I used the wrong sex 
descriptor. In the final analysis, we need to harden up when using this 
type of forum.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691774

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
Message-ID<bcm21d.9b7.19.12@news.alt.net>
In reply to#691773
On 2018-06-24 5:18 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 25/06/2018 7:50 AM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>
>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>
>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>
>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
>> people.
>>
> 
> **It is pretty much impossible to avoid insulting people in this method 
> of communication. Some would be more insulted if I used the wrong sex 
> descriptor. In the final analysis, we need to harden up when using this 
> type of forum.
> 
don't let sex matter just reply to the text

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692261

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA9115DB91DA2Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#691762
Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me: 

> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> 
>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>> read it's posts.
>>> 
>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>> 
>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> 
> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use 
> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
> many people.
> 

Who gives a fuck? I don't alter my life to accomodate the mentally ill.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692262

FromYour Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1>
Date2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
Message-ID<y7adnfYs9ecSF6rGnZ2dnUU7-LvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#692261
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:12:46 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Avenging Angel
<Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>" determined that the following was of
great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in
<XnsA9115DB91DA2Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>:
 
>Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me: 
>
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: 
>>>On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>**I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't read
>>>>>it's posts.
>>>>ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>**Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>"they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>>many people. 
>
>Who gives a fuck? I don't alter my life to accomodate the mentally ill.

are you going to get worked up about it?

-- 
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this 
seems to be the new norm in the world.  It's spreading like a cancer, 
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil.  We need to put an 
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell 
everywhere.  We need to get these people out of every civilized 
country, and there's only one way to do it.  IOW, we have to become 
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) 

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working.  We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too.  One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode 

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692320

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA912673E4D38Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#692262
Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus
=?UTF-8?B?8J+Qtuesmw==?= <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in
news:y7adnfYs9ecSF6rGnZ2dnUU7-LvNnZ2d@giganews.com: 

> On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:12:46 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Avenging
> Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>" determined that the following
> was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it
> with us in <XnsA9115DB91DA2Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>:
>  
>>Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>>news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me: 
>>
>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: 
>>>>On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>**I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I
>>>>>>don't read it's posts.
>>>>>ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>**Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>>"they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>>>many people. 
>>
>>Who gives a fuck? I don't alter my life to accomodate the mentally
>>ill. 
> 
> are you going to get worked up about it?
> 

As usual, you missed the point.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692333

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35a29adab4549b799941ce@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#692320
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <XnsA912673E4D38Dgreyghost471bazinga@
85.214.115.223>, Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com says...


> 
> Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus
> =?UTF-8?B?8J+Qtuesmw==?= <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in
> news:y7adnfYs9ecSF6rGnZ2dnUU7-LvNnZ2d@giganews.com: 
> 
> > On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 13:12:46 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Avenging
> > Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>" determined that the following
> > was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it
> > with us in <XnsA9115DB91DA2Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>:
> >  
> >>Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> >>news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me: 
> >>
> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote: 
> >>>>On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>>On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>**I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I
> >>>>>>don't read it's posts.
> >>>>>ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> >>>>**Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> >>>Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> >>>"they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
> >>>many people. 
> >>
> >>Who gives a fuck? I don't alter my life to accomodate the mentally
> >>ill. 
> > 
> > are you going to get worked up about it?
> > 
> 
> As usual, you missed the point.

Pussy Willow wouldn't know a point if it was up his ass.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692264

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
Message-ID<ph83fp$d67$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692261
On 6/30/2018 9:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
> news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me:
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>
>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>
>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>
>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>> many people.
> 
> Who gives a fuck?

I do, dickwad.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692482

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
Message-ID<phfase$jtm$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#692264

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:ph83fp$d67$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 6/30/2018 9:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>
>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>
>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>>> many people.
>>
>> Who gives a fuck?
>
> I do, dickwad.

it's getting rather nasty....

The personal pronouns are: I, you, we, he, she, it, me, us, him,her, they, 
them.

Once we eliminate the plural pronouns: we, us, they and them, we are left 
with the singular pronouns.

Once we eliminate the gender specific singular pronouns: he, she, him, her

and then we eliminate the first person singular pronouns: I, me

And the 2nd person singular pronouns: you

We have only one pronoun left: It.

So when talking about an individual not present in the conversation the only 
proper pronoun to us is "IT".

If it finds that offensive, then maybe it should reconsider its feelings 
towards gender specific singular pronouns.

Until then it shall be called an it because no one wants to offend its 
sensibilities by imposing an unwanted gender designation on it even if such 
a designation is factually true.

it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it,

AND IT!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692486

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
Message-ID<phfe6m$1sgp$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692482
On 7/3/2018 4:01 AM, Scout wrote:
> The personal pronouns are: I, you, we, he, she, me, us, him,her, 
> they, them.
FTFY. HTH, HAND.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692570

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
Message-ID<phhfbj$uq4$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#692486

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:phfe6m$1sgp$2@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 7/3/2018 4:01 AM, Scout wrote:
>> The personal pronouns are: I, you, we, he, she, me, us, him,her, they, 
>> them.
> FTFY. HTH, HAND.

Translation: when I hate reality I simply deny reality and then claim to 
have fixed it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692588

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
Message-ID<phi3bn$a0t$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#692570
On 7/3/2018 11:31 PM, Scout wrote:
> when I hate reality I simply deny reality and then claim to have fixed it.

Believe me, we've noticed that about you.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692493

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35a4f1a8a622cd2199420b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#692264
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ph83fp$d67$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> I do, dickwad.

Sounds like what you probably said when you took your wedding "vows".

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#692598

FromAvenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com>
Date2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
Message-ID<XnsA9157201D406Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223>
In reply to#692264
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in news:ph83fp$d67$1
@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 6/30/2018 9:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me:
>> 
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I 
don't
>>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>
>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>
>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>>> many people.
>> 
>> Who gives a fuck?
> 
> I do, dickwad.
> 

You don't matter.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web