Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #692482

Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

From "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change
Date 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <phfase$jtm$5@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <pgoj8h$s9k$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fpadkgF98o8U1@mid.individual.net> <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me> <XnsA9115DB91DA2Dgreyghost471bazinga@85.214.115.223> <ph83fp$d67$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw



"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:ph83fp$d67$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 6/30/2018 9:12 AM, Avenging Angel wrote:
>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>> news:pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>>>> read it's posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>>>
>>>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
>>>
>>> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
>>> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by
>>> many people.
>>
>> Who gives a fuck?
>
> I do, dickwad.

it's getting rather nasty....

The personal pronouns are: I, you, we, he, she, it, me, us, him,her, they, 
them.

Once we eliminate the plural pronouns: we, us, they and them, we are left 
with the singular pronouns.

Once we eliminate the gender specific singular pronouns: he, she, him, her

and then we eliminate the first person singular pronouns: I, me

And the 2nd person singular pronouns: you

We have only one pronoun left: It.

So when talking about an individual not present in the conversation the only 
proper pronoun to us is "IT".

If it finds that offensive, then maybe it should reconsider its feelings 
towards gender specific singular pronouns.

Until then it shall be called an it because no one wants to offend its 
sensibilities by imposing an unwanted gender designation on it even if such 
a designation is factually true.

it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it, 
it, it, it, it, it, it, it, it,

AND IT! 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

csiph-web