Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683279 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-02 05:10 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-05 19:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 254 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-02 05:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-02 08:37 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:33 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-05-11 06:42 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:26 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-02 09:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-02 09:01 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-03 05:34 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 09:41 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 11:55 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:33 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:50 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 21:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 22:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:24 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-04 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-04 18:28 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 16:33 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:52 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-05 16:23 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:29 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-06 12:55 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:14 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:37 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:03 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:13 -0400
Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 07:53 -0700
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:51 -0400
Reading "Sci.Physics", as I have for 12+ years. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 10:29 -0700
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:28 -0400
Re: Comrade Jim Jones preyed on people like "kensi". Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 20:56 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:11 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:17 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-06 19:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-06 16:52 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:05 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:05 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:43 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:32 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:46 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:06 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 16:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 14:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:21 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:47 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:50 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 00:06 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:53 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:00 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 18:20 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 12:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-10 13:41 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-10 18:45 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:41 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:42 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 16:33 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:11 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 20:24 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:06 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-10 20:32 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 17:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:12 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 08:01 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 10:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 11:04 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:27 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:15 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:43 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-14 18:35 +0100
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 14:54 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:42 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-10 16:34 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:14 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 08:41 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:41 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:26 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:13 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 10:02 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:40 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:18 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:20 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:32 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:52 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:15 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 20:51 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:22 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:38 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:43 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:23 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:33 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:44 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:28 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:17 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:15 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:36 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 20:29 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:00 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-04 17:51 -0600
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:46 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:39 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 12:24 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:56 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-05 05:20 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:35 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:11 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-05 20:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:16 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:39 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:07 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:26 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 00:49 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 08:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:08 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 14:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:09 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:05 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:14 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 19:17 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-09 00:40 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:48 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:21 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:04 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:33 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:23 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:31 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:26 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 22:44 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:26 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:37 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 19:24 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 23:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:35 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:03 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:29 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:32 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-09 11:19 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-11 08:24 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 21:05 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:39 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 09:47 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 11:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 13:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:22 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 12:27 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 14:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:47 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 15:20 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:34 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-09 18:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 07:59 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:30 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:31 +0000
Not everyone who fails to spam you with esoteric math is stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-12 10:11 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-09 20:16 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:13 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 08:50 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:53 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:26 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:27 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 16:34 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-10 22:50 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-11 07:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-11 11:27 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 19:31 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 12:47 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-12 06:04 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-12 08:03 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-03 10:51 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 11:57 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 11:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 14:58 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-03 23:35 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 19:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-03 21:47 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:52 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-03 22:44 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:26 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:46 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:20 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:18 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:33 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:36 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:18 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-11 02:19 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:53 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:56 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:54 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:20 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:17 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-08 01:12 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:23 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-04 03:08 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-04 05:28 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 13:28 -0700
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 22:55 +0000
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 00:42 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 06:10 -0400
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:21 -0500
Re: Climate change dials down Atlantic Ocean heating system Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 19:28 -0700
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 22:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pd2i2a$aep$34@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684820 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 10 May 2018 16:37:53 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/10/2018 3:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 09 May 2018 21:34:01 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt >>>>>>>>> you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more >>>>>>>> valuable than some old car. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out >>>>>>> some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even >>>>>>> realize the problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my >>>>>>>> toes, >>>>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying >>>>>>>> Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>>>>>>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what >>>>>>>> she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually >>>>>>>> crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>>>> >>>>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house >>>>> that big means...... >>>> >>>> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized >>>> in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >>>> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's >>>> LEED-certified, >>>> and the only structure for miles that is. >>> >>> very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. >> >> When the outside temperature is nice, which is twice a day most of the >> year in this climate, open windows and fans freshen up the inside air. > > oh, your back to "Nads games", without your <sneakers> ? > > are you kensi/Nads/Yota/Libtard/Bevis/Paul/Roy this time ? > > > <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> > > > <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> > > > (goo<SMACKAKOOK!> Nope. Try again in a few more hours, after you've sobered up enough to write coherent and understandable English. Whatever you're on right now, it's making you unintelligible. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 19:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd2nsr$1c8i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684838 |
On 5/10/2018 5:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 10 May 2018 16:37:53 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/10/2018 3:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 21:34:01 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt >>>>>>>>>> you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more >>>>>>>>> valuable than some old car. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out >>>>>>>> some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even >>>>>>>> realize the problem. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my >>>>>>>>> toes, >>>>>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying >>>>>>>>> Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>>>>>>>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what >>>>>>>>> she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually >>>>>>>>> crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house >>>>>> that big means...... >>>>> >>>>> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized >>>>> in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >>>>> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's >>>>> LEED-certified, >>>>> and the only structure for miles that is. >>>> >>>> very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. >>> >>> When the outside temperature is nice, which is twice a day most of the >>> year in this climate, open windows and fans freshen up the inside air. >> >> oh, your back to "Nads games", without your <sneakers> ? >> >> are you kensi/Nads/Yota/Libtard/Bevis/Paul/Roy this time ? >> >> >> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> >> >> >> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> >> >> >> (goo<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Nope. Try again in a few more hours, after you've sobered up enough to > write coherent and understandable English. Whatever you're on right now, > it's making you unintelligible. > no need to take "Nads" seriously, as "Nads" never is, and 'she' still dosen't know any physics, or science, and never will.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-10 23:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd35k7$1td2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684846 |
On 5/10/2018 7:24 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/10/2018 5:45 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Thu, 10 May 2018 16:37:53 -0500, Sergio wrote: >> >>> On 5/10/2018 3:26 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Wed, 09 May 2018 21:34:01 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/2018 2:20 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 21:31:12 -0400, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> "Bricked" <bricked@barkingspiders.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:ijf4fdpbtlfkni0ko81a758tl0gtfp6nmh@4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 23:23:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt >>>>>>>>>>> you an EPIC SPNAK on that point] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> INSULATION. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> she rents >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more >>>>>>>>>> valuable than some old car. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out >>>>>>>>> some conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even >>>>>>>>> realize the problem. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't on my >>>>>>>>>> toes, >>>>>>>>>> was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by saying >>>>>>>>>> Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is >>>>>>>>>> obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what >>>>>>>>>> she is ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually >>>>>>>>>> crashes as someone else's pad. Hence no rent! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wouldn't talk bad about your daddy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1800 square feet.....think of all the pollution that having a house >>>>>>> that big means...... >>>>>> >>>>>> Most of the ones in this area are 3600+. Mine is also very modernized >>>>>> in having triple-glazed windows, new insulation, and other changes to >>>>>> minimize heating and cooling costs and energy use. It's >>>>>> LEED-certified, >>>>>> and the only structure for miles that is. >>>>> >>>>> very tight structure, guess you don't get much oxygen in there. >>>> >>>> When the outside temperature is nice, which is twice a day most of the >>>> year in this climate, open windows and fans freshen up the inside air. >>> >>> oh, your back to "Nads games", without your <sneakers> ? >>> >>> are you kensi/Nads/Yota/Libtard/Bevis/Paul/Roy this time ? >>> >>> >>> <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> >>> >>> >>> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> >>> >>> >>> (goo<SMACKAKOOK!> >> > > no need to take "Nads" seriously, as "Nads" never is, and 'she' still > dosen't know any physics, or science, and never will. > oh, your back to "Nads games", without your <sneakers> ? are you kensi/Nads/Yota/Libtard/Bevis/Paul/Roy this time ? <https://goo.gl/sbdRcq> <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC> this picture of Nads makes kensi pupa horny.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 22:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355c2878a941b0cb993955@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684442 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pctbgr$ci8$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:33:32 -0400, benj wrote: > > > On 5/8/2018 4:04 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 08:46:11 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/8/2018 5:23 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: > >> [snip bogus claim about solar EROI -- I see kensi already dealt you an > >> EPIC SPNAK on that point] > >>>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... > >>>>> INSULATION. > >>>> > >>>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? > >>> > >>> she rents > >> > >> Nope. > > > > Lie. No lib is stable enough to actually OWN anything more valuable than > > some old car. > > Just you watch. In less than a week the same kook will burble out some > conspiracy theory about George Soros. And he won't even realize the > problem. > > > A house is clearly out of the question. Oh wait! I wasn't > > on my toes, was I? Stooopid me! I jumped to a conclusion that Nads by > > saying Nope to "rent" was saying she actually owned a place which is > > obviously impossible. But clearly (coming to my lib senses) what she is > > ACTUALLY saying is that she owns nothing and actually crashes as someone > > else's pad. Hence no rent! > > > > Cho<SMACKAKOOK!> > > It's about 1800 square feet, kooktard. My bathroom is bigger than that... when I pee outside, which I can do, because there ain't no one around to admire my junk. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcsvqq$ci8$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684313 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 06:23:11 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>> again. >> >> Solar? >> >> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the coal >> being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? > > Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar, > k0Ok. > >> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >> produced it in the first place? > > Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they > return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in > the first place. > >> That even if it does manage to reach a net positive energy that won't >> begin to offset the fact that all the pollution 'saved' over that life >> span of the panel would instead be condensed and released in a matter >> of days instead of decades? > > A concentrated problem is easier to deal with. Electric cars replace > thousands of tiny tailpipes with one big smokestack, and CCS can be used > there much more easily, or that smokestack replaced with a solar panel. > A solid lump of lead can be sealed in wax or something and buried > somewhere geologically stable, or even just reused, whereas the same > mass as lead dust dispersed over a huge area is a huge problem. And so > forth. > >> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >> INSULATION. > > How do you know she isn't doing that too? She is. If you're still talking about me, that is. :) Or rather, she was. She insulated her place quite nicely a while back. The infrared doohickey shows very little thermal leaking near any of the windows or doors, even. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 17:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <_EoIC.59634$nT1.19042@fx20.iad> |
| In reply to | #684398 |
On 5/8/2018 4:03 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 06:23:11 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>> again. >>> >>> Solar? >>> >>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the coal >>> being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? >> >> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar, >> k0Ok. >> >>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>> produced it in the first place? >> >> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >> the first place. >> >>> That even if it does manage to reach a net positive energy that won't >>> begin to offset the fact that all the pollution 'saved' over that life >>> span of the panel would instead be condensed and released in a matter >>> of days instead of decades? >> >> A concentrated problem is easier to deal with. Electric cars replace >> thousands of tiny tailpipes with one big smokestack, and CCS can be used >> there much more easily, or that smokestack replaced with a solar panel. >> A solid lump of lead can be sealed in wax or something and buried >> somewhere geologically stable, or even just reused, whereas the same >> mass as lead dust dispersed over a huge area is a huge problem. And so >> forth. >> >>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>> INSULATION. >> >> How do you know she isn't doing that too? > > She is. If you're still talking about me, that is. :) Or rather, she was. > She insulated her place quite nicely a while back. The infrared doohickey > shows very little thermal leaking near any of the windows or doors, even. > Hey, Nads, scientific genius, I seem to be having some trouble. My science education seems inadequate to understand the subtleties of climate change. In particular I don't seem to recognize that crucial piece of climate gear known as the "infrared doohicky"! Perhaps you could get "Kanzi" to jump into your sock and give us a Ph.D. level exposition of what exactly a science "doohicky" is. Inquiring minds want to know. This is SO funny! I love it when libs try to bluff their way pretending to know science. <snicker> (This time for real, not even rule #5!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 14:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8pqio.94o.19.12@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684419 |
On 2018-05-08 2:29 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/8/2018 4:03 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 06:23:11 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> Solar? >>>> >>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the coal >>>> being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? >>> >>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar, >>> k0Ok. >>> >>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to >>>> produced it in the first place? >>> >>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they >>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in >>> the first place. >>> >>>> That even if it does manage to reach a net positive energy that won't >>>> begin to offset the fact that all the pollution 'saved' over that life >>>> span of the panel would instead be condensed and released in a matter >>>> of days instead of decades? >>> >>> A concentrated problem is easier to deal with. Electric cars replace >>> thousands of tiny tailpipes with one big smokestack, and CCS can be used >>> there much more easily, or that smokestack replaced with a solar panel. >>> A solid lump of lead can be sealed in wax or something and buried >>> somewhere geologically stable, or even just reused, whereas the same >>> mass as lead dust dispersed over a huge area is a huge problem. And so >>> forth. >>> >>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... >>>> INSULATION. >>> >>> How do you know she isn't doing that too? >> >> She is. If you're still talking about me, that is. :) Or rather, she was. >> She insulated her place quite nicely a while back. The infrared doohickey >> shows very little thermal leaking near any of the windows or doors, even. >> > Hey, Nads, scientific genius, I seem to be having some trouble. My > science education seems inadequate to understand the subtleties of > climate change. In particular I don't seem to recognize that crucial > piece of climate gear known as the "infrared doohicky"! Perhaps you > could get "Kanzi" to jump into your sock and give us a Ph.D. level > exposition of what exactly a science "doohicky" is. Inquiring minds want > to know. > > This is SO funny! > I love it when libs try to bluff their way pretending to know science. > > <snicker> (This time for real, not even rule #5!) that's a lie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 20:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pctib6$ula$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684398 |
On 5/8/2018 3:03 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 06:23:11 -0400, kensi wrote:
>
>> On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote:
>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org...
>>>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try
>>>> again.
>>>
>>> Solar?
>>>
>>> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the coal
>>> being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel?
>>
>> Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar,
>> k0Ok.
>>
>>> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as
>>> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to
>>> produced it in the first place?
>>
>> Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. Which means they
>> return over ten times the energy that was consumed to produce them in
>> the first place.
>>
>>> That even if it does manage to reach a net positive energy that won't
>>> begin to offset the fact that all the pollution 'saved' over that life
>>> span of the panel would instead be condensed and released in a matter
>>> of days instead of decades?
>>
>> A concentrated problem is easier to deal with. Electric cars replace
>> thousands of tiny tailpipes with one big smokestack, and CCS can be used
>> there much more easily, or that smokestack replaced with a solar panel.
>> A solid lump of lead can be sealed in wax or something and buried
>> somewhere geologically stable, or even just reused, whereas the same
>> mass as lead dust dispersed over a huge area is a huge problem. And so
>> forth.
>>
>>> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference......
>>> INSULATION.
>>
>> How do you know she isn't doing that too?
>
> She is. If you're still talking about me, that is. :) Or rather, she was.
> She insulated her place quite nicely a while back. The infrared doohickey
> shows very little thermal leaking near any of the windows or doors, even.
>
(little slippy there Nads/kensipupa)
how do you know she insulated her place ?
and what is this "doohickey"?
What is thermal leaking ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 11:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcv3is$1d73$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684466 |
On 5/8/2018 9:19 PM, Sergio wrote: > What is thermal leaking ? Warm piss, dumnass. -- Dinsdale
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-11 08:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pd45jl$1j2l$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684573 |
On 5/9/2018 10:19 AM, Dinsdale wrote: > On 5/8/2018 9:19 PM, Sergio wrote: >> What is thermal leaking ? > > Warm piss, dumnass. > <http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 21:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pctj5i$4fh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684313 |
"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:pcrtqh$6ho$1@gioia.aioe.org... > On 5/8/2018 12:49 AM, Scout wrote: >> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:pcmk83$1t2r$5@gioia.aioe.org... >>> I offset my carbon use in various ways and Nadegda's on solar. Try >>> again. >> >> Solar? >> >> You mean the means that results in massive amounts of CO2 from the coal >> being burned to produce the electricity needed to make the panel? > > Any energy can be used to make the panel, including wind and more solar, > k0Ok. Sure, but in China, where the cells are manufactured they primarily use C O A L...and dirty coal at that. Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as used to create them. Further we would also need to consider the added heat that solar would cause since the panels are more absorptive than reflective and thus would trap more solar heat within the atmosphere thus compounding any global warming. >> That over it's average life span it almost certainly won't produce as >> much useable and used real world electricity as was consumed to produced >> it in the first place? > > Wrong. Modern solar panels have an EROI in the teens. In theory, in practice, the average return is less than the sum of the energy investment to create the panel. Nor does this eliminate the fact that the pollution caused by production is all concentrated at the time of production thus compounding the effect of the pollution produced rather than the more distributed pollution produced by conventional methods. >hich means they return over ten times the energy that was consumed to >produce them in the first place. Not really, given that the average real world observed life is 17 years...which puts it right around your best case result for energy neutrality. >> That even if it does manage to reach a net positive energy that won't >> begin to offset the fact that all the pollution 'saved' over that life >> span of the panel would instead be condensed and released in a matter of >> days instead of decades? > > A concentrated problem is easier to deal with. Electric cars replace > thousands of tiny tailpipes with one big smokestack, and CCS can be used > there much more easily, or that smokestack replaced with a solar panel. Yes, but then you have a lot more conversion loses in electric cars, as well as the pollution from all the rare earth mining necessary to get the elements used in the motors and batteries for such cars. > A solid lump of lead can be sealed in wax or something and buried > somewhere geologically stable, or even just reused, whereas the same mass > as lead dust dispersed over a huge area is a huge problem. And so forth. Which is exactly what happens with solar cell production which involves a lot of heavy metals and toxic chemicals. They can't be removed totally from the discharge so they are dispersed over a vast area as air pollution, water pollution and soil pollution. Further such chemicals remain for centuries or longer and don't break down quickly and easily like common green house gases would and do. > >> Tell you what, if you REALLY want to make a difference...... INSULATION. > > How do you know she isn't doing that too? She wouldn't be wasting money on dirty solar while claiming to be 'saving the planet'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcumlj$l2o$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684472 |
On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: > Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when > then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as > used to create them. Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being massively refuted. >> hich means they return over ten times the energy that was consumed to >> produce them in the first place. > > Not really, given that the average real world observed life is 17 > years...which puts it right around your best case result for energy > neutrality. Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 that's well into positive net energy territory. And they actually last 30. > Yes, but then you have a lot more conversion loses in electric cars, You must be joking. A normal gasoline car has a tank-to-wheel efficiency of 16%. An electric car, at 85% to 90%, is over four times as efficient at turning energy into motion. Well-to-tank efficiency is also greater for electric, especially if the energy source is renewable. https://matter2energy.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/wells-to-wheels-electric-car-efficiency/ > break down quickly and easily like common green house gases would and do. CO2 has a residency time in the atmosphere measured in centuries, k0ok. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 09:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcv1mb$19m0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684537 |
On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: > >> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when >> then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as >> used to create them. > > Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being > massively refuted. you failed, the links ignore total cost of ownership. > >>> hich means they return over ten times the energy that was consumed to >>> produce them in the first place. >> >> Not really, given that the average real world observed life is 17 >> years...which puts it right around your best case result for energy >> neutrality. > > Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 that's > well into positive net energy territory. And they actually last 30. liar, try 7 to 10 year. > >> Yes, but then you have a lot more conversion loses in electric cars, > > You must be joking. A normal gasoline car has a tank-to-wheel efficiency > of 16%. An electric car, at 85% to 90%, is over four times as efficient > at turning energy into motion. wrong. apples and oranges, you have to transport the electricity to the location, and generate the electricity is made a 60% chance of using coal. you have to store the electricity in special $6,000 batteries that have to be replaced every 7 years and deal with that pollution <snip crap>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 11:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcv315$1beh$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684564 |
On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: >>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when >>> then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as >>> used to create them. >> >> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being >> massively refuted. > > you failed, No. >> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 that's >> well into positive net energy territory. And they actually last 30. > > liar, try 7 to 10 year. Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd STILL be wrong on the larger point! But I guess you're used to being wrong all the time by now... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 13:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcvfji$33v$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684571 |
On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: >>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when >>>> then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as >>>> used to create them. >>> >>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being >>> massively refuted. >> >> you failed, > > No. accept the fact that you failed, the links ignore total cost of ownership. > >>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 that's >>> well into positive net energy territory. And they actually last 30. >> >> liar, try 7 to 10 year. > > Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year > payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd > STILL be wrong on the larger point! > you are 10 years behind the times; Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding https://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2013/07/08/germanys-solar-industry-is-imploding/#2556bb4a6ef9 Solar PV has failed in Germany and it will fail in the UK https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/mar/11/solar-power-germany-feed-in-tariff
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 19:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcvhoq$aep$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684591 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:44:57 -0500, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar >>>>> when then panels are most likely never going to produce as much >>>>> energy as used to create them. >>>> >>>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being >>>> massively refuted. >>> >>> you failed, >> >> No. >> >>>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 >>>> that's well into positive net energy territory. And they actually >>>> last 30. >>> >>> liar, try 7 to 10 year. >> >> Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year >> payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd >> STILL be wrong on the larger point! > > you are 10 years behind the times; > > Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding > > https://www.forbes.<SMACKAKOOK!> Stick your right-wing propaganda where the sun don't shine. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 12:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8s7kg.1pu.19.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684605 |
On 2018-05-09 12:22 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:44:57 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar >>>>>> when then panels are most likely never going to produce as much >>>>>> energy as used to create them. >>>>> >>>>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being >>>>> massively refuted. >>>> >>>> you failed, >>> >>> No. >>> >>>>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 >>>>> that's well into positive net energy territory. And they actually >>>>> last 30. >>>> >>>> liar, try 7 to 10 year. >>> >>> Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year >>> payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd >>> STILL be wrong on the larger point! >> >> you are 10 years behind the times; >> >> Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding >> >> https://www.forbes.<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Stick your right-wing propaganda where the sun don't shine. > you want his propaganda under your belly flap , why
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 14:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcviui$8jt$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684605 |
On 5/9/2018 2:22 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:44:57 -0500, Sergio wrote:
>
>> On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar
>>>>>> when then panels are most likely never going to produce as much
>>>>>> energy as used to create them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being
>>>>> massively refuted.
>>>>
>>>> you failed,
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17
>>>>> that's well into positive net energy territory. And they actually
>>>>> last 30.
>>>>
>>>> liar, try 7 to 10 year.
>>>
>>> Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year
>>> payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd
>>> STILL be wrong on the larger point!
>>
>> you are 10 years behind the times;
>>
>> Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding
>>
>> https://www.forbes.<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
> Stick your right-wing propaganda where the sun don't shine.
>
Hillary loves you, but in a different way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 13:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355cf4217d7293599396f@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684605 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcvhoq$aep$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 09 May 2018 13:44:57 -0500, Sergio wrote: > > > On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote: > >> On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: > >>> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: > >>>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar > >>>>> when then panels are most likely never going to produce as much > >>>>> energy as used to create them. > >>>> > >>>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being > >>>> massively refuted. > >>> > >>> you failed, > >> > >> No. > >> > >>>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 > >>>> that's well into positive net energy territory. And they actually > >>>> last 30. > >>> > >>> liar, try 7 to 10 year. > >> > >> Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year > >> payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd > >> STILL be wrong on the larger point! > > > > you are 10 years behind the times; > > > > Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding > > > > https://www.forbes.<SMACKAKOOK!> > > Stick your right-wing propaganda where the sun don't shine. Assume the position... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 15:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0fIIC.116418$1e7.105949@fx38.iad> |
| In reply to | #684591 |
On 5/9/2018 2:44 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/9/2018 10:10 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/9/2018 10:47 AM, Sergio wrote: >>> On 5/9/2018 6:39 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 9:05 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>> Further it's kind of pointless to use solar to produce more solar when >>>>> then panels are most likely never going to produce as much energy as >>>>> used to create them. >>>> >>>> Didn't we *just* do this dance? It ended with that k'lame being >>>> massively refuted. >>> >>> you failed, >> >> No. > > accept the fact that you failed, the links ignore total cost of ownership. > >> >>>> Idiot. If the payoff time is one to four years and they last 17 that's >>>> well into positive net energy territory. And they actually last 30. >>> >>> liar, try 7 to 10 year. >> >> Wrong, as already established, but even if that were correct a 7 year >> payoff time means 10 years of free energy from it afterward. = you'd >> STILL be wrong on the larger point! >> > > you are 10 years behind the times; > > Germany's Solar Industry Is Imploding > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2013/07/08/germanys-solar-industry-is-imploding/#2556bb4a6ef9 > > Solar PV has failed in Germany and it will fail in the UK > > https://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/mar/11/solar-power-germany-feed-in-tariff > This is SO typical of Marxist Libs and their wonderful ideas. I recall some years ago the CEO of Exxon (yes that guy) on Charlie Rose (before Rose's perversions were outed) explaining in no uncertain terms (with math, figures and everything) how the liberal plans for Solar and Wind were doomed to fail to take over as a power source for civilization. It was hilarious to see this truth pouring out on liberal PBS and right into Globalist Rose's face! But libs still try to sell the plan as their "green revolution" crashed and burns. One more epic fail in their record. Libs do this over and over and nobody ever catches on. Remember when Marxism was going to turn the earth into utopia? Wonderful Lib understanding of human nature. Not only tortured half the world with idiot schemes (Like cultural revolution) and murdered a hundred million to prop the scheme up, in the end it crashed and burned like all liberal idiocies. Remember when they convinced Congress to stop all school shootings by posting "gun free zone" signs in all schools. So how did that work out? Any person with the tiniest modicum of common sense would understand that criminals and nutjobs do not obey laws let along signs. And all it did was create sanctuary zones, where shooters don't have to worry about someone shooting back. But somehow these libs are so good at fantasy they dominate entertainment and news and in spite of example after example (burning food to save the planet is a good one) They change the words over and over and none of you stoops can figure out they are doing it again. Shame on all you people who let them get away with this bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web