Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #510818 > unrolled thread
| Started by | me <idatarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-02 02:46 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-08-03 21:52 +0000 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
music & ai me <idatarm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 02:46 -0700
Re: music & ai R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-08-02 10:01 +0000
Re: music & ai benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 01:40 -0400
Re: music & ai Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-03 13:21 +0000
Re: music & ai noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:34 -0700
Re: music & ai Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-03 21:52 +0000
| From | me <idatarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 02:46 -0700 |
| Subject | music & ai |
| Message-ID | <1e5a25cf-b942-4e59-84f3-6706066c80b9@googlegroups.com> |
http://www.last.fm/music/d.o.kumi-o/Virtuoso would ai be able to generate music? what about game theory? -suresh
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-02 10:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mpkppm$bi5$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> |
| In reply to | #510818 |
me <idatarm@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.last.fm/music/d.o.kumi-o/Virtuoso > would ai be able to generate music? For 30-40 years that I know of. Mostly in LISP from my experience. > what about game theory? More interesting. GT finds good or optimal stretegies in situations where there are opposing goals. Certainly some composition could be frame in such a way. But I have not head of such, not that music comp is in my area. :) > -suresh -- For every credibility gap, there is a gullibility fill. -- Richard Clopton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 01:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <t9Dvx.74556$XZ5.28477@fx19.iad> |
| In reply to | #510818 |
On 08/02/2015 05:46 AM, me wrote:
> http://www.last.fm/music/d.o.kumi-o/Virtuoso
>
>
> would ai be able to generate music? what about game theory?
>
>
> -suresh
Sure, music. But AI can't communicate with God so the music will be crap.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 13:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.08.03.13.20.36@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #510901 |
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:40:41 -0400, benj wrote: > > Sure, music. But AI can't communicate with God so the music will be crap. > Will it? In the first place, most current music and art is produced by AI of the flesh and blood variety. Ever hear of "Tin Pan Alley?" It is merely the designation for a collection of human automatons that grind out popular music according to preconceived formulas and templates. There is no inspired creativity (or "communication with God" as you call it) happening. It is all automatic, artificial, and contrived. Secondly, some people find fractal art, that is imagery generated according to certain mathematical algorithms, and even fractal music to be fascinating and enjoyable. I, personally, find such patterns, in spite of a seemingly variegated nature, to be far too regular and predictable to be of any interest. In my case, an enlightened insight into the actual process destroys the experience. But then an enlightened insight can destroy the beauty of all the classic music and art that is held in such high esteem by our civilization. AI generated music (of the machine variety) need not be "crap" to some listeners. Indeed, the aleatory, or purely random, movement in music (e.g. Karlheinz Stockhausen) has a devoted following. Let's face the facts. Art is based in spectacle, and the enjoyment thereof depends in large part on pure ignorance. For me, truthfully, the only sounds that can satisfy are pure noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 13:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f61599ae-9af7-47de-a255-08310dca4d5e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #510930 |
12-tone is garbage, although I have not heard any of the calssically trained S-guy. what is the canonical magor key, not C > some listeners. Indeed, the aleatory, or purely random, movement in music > (e.g. Karlheinz Stockhausen) has a devoted following. > > Let's face the facts. Art is based in spectacle, and the enjoyment > thereof depends in large part on pure ignorance. > > For me, truthfully, the only sounds that can satisfy are pure noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-03 21:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.08.03.21.52.46@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #511048 |
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:34:10 -0700, noTthaTguY wrote: > 12-tone is garbage, > That judgment doesn't mean very much coming from someone who idolizes Lady Gaga while munching a bag of Cheetos and swilling a can of diet soda. Don't blame the aspartame. You were born that way.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web