Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #677269 > unrolled thread

_Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 17:26 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 17:12 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 12:15 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 09:36 -0700
      Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 14:42 -0700
        Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 08:13 -0700
          Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 12:36 -0700
            Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 19:50 -0700
              Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 20:02 -0700
                Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-04 03:28 +0000
                  Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 21:37 -0700
                  Moroney's tests with Nomen tests versus Barry Shein tests with Eric Francis tests Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 19:09 -0700
                    Re: Moroney's tests with Nomen tests versus Barry Shein tests with Eric Francis tests Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 11:15 -0700
                  Re: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:20 -0700
                  Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 11:53 -0700
                  Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 08:59 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 13:24 -0700
    Re: _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:03 -0700

#677269 — _Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000

Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 

Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 

Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 

Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 

Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 

PHYSICS TEST:: 

1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 

So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 

Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#677439

On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:26:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 
> 
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP



in 1999 i had a big enertia to talking to people and  (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 1 view updated 9:43 AM

if i stopeed the machines rockstars in 1999 i was a godzilla if i was (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 1 view updated 8:25 AM
 

the americans they ruin people s lives live for everyone to see and then they smile they are happy those schizzophrenic  (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 1 view updated 8:07 AM

AP writes: the above is a churning spammer of sci.physics-- just wanting to push everyone off the front page

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#677594

On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:26:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 
> 
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP



Why McGinn Wins Every Argument (4)
By Claudius Denk 11 posts 58 views updated 2:03 PM
+ 5 others
 



Announcing the Next Bobo Pool! (107)
By Nadegda 107 posts 16 views updated 1:44 PM
 




Meteorologists Don't Debate For a Reason -- (just like climate scientists) (32)
By Claudius Denk 42 posts 104 views updated 1:04 PM
 
+ 8 others
 



The History of Science Has Shown . . . (1)
By Claudius Denk 3 posts 15 views updated 1:03 PM
 

This topic has been hidden because it was flagged for abuse.




McGinn Quote: Well Understoodedness (2)
By Claudius Denk 5 posts 24 views updated 1:01 PM

AP writes:: Is UCLA backing the Spamming McGinn ?? Or is McGinn a Russian robot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#677722

Re: Calling someone a dopehead ... (1)
By Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. 1 post 0 views updated 11:24 AM
 
This topic has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.

i forgot the area variable area ->energy=resistance*area*deltavm (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 11:02 AM
 
Announcing the Next Bobo Pool! (18)
By Nadegda 132 posts 20 views updated 11:00 AM


AP writes:: the above sh)thead poster is here to sell his filter app and in the meantime shoves all legitimate posters off the front page

On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:26:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 
> 
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#677903

On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:52:42 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 
> And Archie's response to the babblers and offtopic spammers that ruin
> his beloved 'front page' is to... spam a bunch of babbling, offtopic
> posts himself.  Mr. Plutonium really, truly 'doesn't get it', how he
> is just as bad as those he complains about.
> 
> So why does Archie Plutonium flood these groups with these offtopic
> posts complaining about offtopic posts?
> 
> [ ] Archie Plutonium is a 'front page hog'.
> [ ] Archie is a spammer.
> [ ] Archie is narcissistic.
> [ ] Archie 'just doesn't get it'.
> [ ] All of the above.



Rent closely tracks gas prices. (10)
By Jeff-Relf.Me 10 posts 10 views updated 4:29 PM
+ 5 others
 

 

Re: Calling someone a dopehead ... (8)
By Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. 8 posts 4 views updated 3:44 PM
+ 6 others
 
This topic has been hidden because you reported it for abuse.


america is full of  (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 2:57 PM
 

in 1999 they gave me steel and made me believe (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 0 views updated 2:48 PM
 



1999 theft->the americans pulleld me with (1)
By _...@__.__ 1 post 1 view updated 2:39 PM

AP writes: what do all these physics failures have in common? Is it they want Higgs autograph???????

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#678350

> On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:52:42 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> > 
> > And Archie's response to the babblers and offtopic spammers that ruin
> > his beloved 'front page' is to... spam a bunch of babbling, offtopic
> > posts himself.  Mr. Plutonium really, truly 'doesn't get it', how he
> > is just as bad as those he complains about.
> > 
> > So why does Archie Plutonium flood these groups with these offtopic
> > posts complaining about offtopic posts?
> > 
> > [ ] Archie Plutonium is a 'front page hog'.
> > [ ] Archie is a spammer.
> > [ ] Archie is narcissistic.
> > [ ] Archie 'just doesn't get it'.
> > [ ] All of the above.
> 
> 
> 



♥♥♥AMAZING HEupdated 8:19 AM
 



♥♥♥AMAZING HEAL 1 post 0 views updated 8:17 AM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679012

Dan Christensen wrote:



10:29 AM (2 hours ago)



Just as we do NOT need an axiom or definition that distinguishes numbers from all other objects to develop number theory, we also do NOT need an axiom or definition that distinguishes sets from all other objects to develop set theory. We just a need a short list of axioms giving the essential, self-evident properties of sets (e.g. the ZFC axioms) from which to derive other properties of interest. 


Dan
> > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 3:52:42 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > And Archie's response to the babblers and offtopic spammers that ruin
> > > his beloved 'front page' is to... spam a bunch of babbling, offtopic
> > > posts himself.  Mr. Plutonium really, truly 'doesn't get it', how he
> > > is just as bad as those he complains about.
> > > 
> > > So why does Archie Plutonium flood these groups with these offtopic
> > > posts complaining about offtopic posts?
> > > 
> > > [ ] Archie Plutonium is a 'front page hog'.
> > > [ ] Archie is a spammer.
> > > [ ] Archie is narcissistic.
> > > [ ] Archie 'just doesn't get it'.
> > > [ ] All of the above.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ♥♥♥AMAZING HEupdated 8:19 AM
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ♥♥♥AMAZING HEAL 1 post 0 views updated 8:17 AM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679695

Subject: Far too dumb of a human is Richard L. McElroy for he allows 
sci.physics to be polluted day in and day out, via his AIOE.org 
Several years now, sci.physics is plagued by these spammers hiding behind McElroy's AIOE, and causing sci.physics to be a pollution landscape. I say-- never allow any AIOE posts to enter sci.physics. 

Drs.M. Plesser,Kate Scholberg 
Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as Aioe McElroy & Buck Futter//never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV 

Buck Futter writes:

8:48 PM (30 minutes ago)

>This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
>you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 

AP writes: hey, lets allow fake names, fake addresses, fake minds, fake humans, fake organizations post to sci.physics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679862

> Subject: Far too dumb of a human is Richard L. McElroy for he allows 
> sci.physics to be polluted day in and day out, via his AIOE.org 
> Several years now, sci.physics is plagued by these spammers hiding behind McElroy's AIOE, and causing sci.physics to be a pollution landscape. I say-- never allow any AIOE posts to enter sci.physics. 
> 
> Drs.M. Plesser,Kate Scholberg 
> Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as Aioe McElroy & Buck Futter//never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV 
> 
> Buck Futter writes:
> 
> 8:48 PM (30 minutes ago)
> 
> >This is a physics group, not a chemistry group, 
> >you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders. 
> 


Michael Moroney wrote:



3:07 PM (2 hours ago)


> flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679866 — Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:


>> Subject: Far too dumb of a human is Richard L. McElroy for he allows
>> sci.physics to be polluted day in and day out, via his AIOE.org
>> Several years now, sci.physics is plagued by these spammers hiding behind
> McElroy's AIOE, and causing sci.physics to be a pollution landscape. I say
>-- never allow any AIOE posts to enter sci.physics.
>>
>> Drs.M. Plesser,Kate Scholberg
>> Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as Aioe
>McElroy & Buck Futter//never realizing the Real Electron=3Dmuon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
>>
>> Buck Futter writes:
>>
>> 8:48 PM (30 minutes ago)
>>
>> >This is a physics group, not a chemistry group,
>> >you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders.
>>


>Michael Moroney wrote:


>3:07 PM (2 hours ago)


>> [Archimedes Plutonium] flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

In this post:

[X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
[X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
[ ] ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
[X] ...multiple times...
[X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
[X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
[X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
[X] ...who are university math or physics professors...
[X] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
[X] ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
[ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
[ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
[X] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
[X] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
[X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
[X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
[ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
[ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
[ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
[ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
[ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
[ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
[ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...

13 points. Archie is losing it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680833 — Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> 13 points. Archie is losing it.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680998 — Moroney's tests with Nomen tests versus Barry Shein tests with Eric Francis tests

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> 
> 13 points. 

Nomen Nescio writes:

10:43 AM (10 hours ago)

Not that there's a lot of point. It's been a slow kook month, to the point 
that this is all we have: 

Don Quixote Windmill Award: 
[ ] 
[ ] 
       _____                                               
     .'/L|__`.     BEEP BOOP CHIRP PLOP                   
    / =[_]O|` \    OPEN ME UP AND YOU'LL FIND 
    |"+_____":|                                        
  __:='|____`-:__                                         
 ||[] ||====| []||                                         
 ||[] | |=| | []||                                         
 |:||_|=|U| |_||:|                                         
 |:|||]_=_ =[_||:|                                       
 | |||] [_][]C|| |                                         
 | ||-'"""""`-|| |                                         
 /|\\_\_|_|_/_//|\                                         
|___|   /|\   |___|                                       
`---'  |___|  `---'                                       
       `---' 
[ ] Big 
[ ] 
                  _.---._                                         
                .'     / '.                                       
               /      _/   \                                     
              /   .-'`  '.  \          WHO WERE THE CHEESE SKIRTS 
            .'   | ^ _ ^ |   '.                                   
          .'     \   _   /     \                                 
         /        '.___.'       '.                               
        |        _.'   '._        \                               
        |      .' `"---"` '.       |                             
        \      |           |       /                             
         \     | |       | |      /                               
          \    | :--"""--: |    /`                               
           )   | |       | |   (                                 
          /    \.'-.....-'./    \                                 
         /    .' / ;|:| \ '.    |                                 
   .-._  \_.-' .' / ' . : '. '. /                                 
   |  \```      .'  ;     \    `:                                 
    \  \                   '     '.                               
 .--'\  |  '         '       .     `-._                           
/`;--' /_.'          .                 `-.                       
|  `--`        /               \          \                       
 \       .'   '                 '-.        |                     
  \   '               '          __\       |                     
   '.      .                 _.-'  `)     /                       
     '-._                _.-' `| .-`   _.'                       
         `'--....____.--'|     (`  _.-'                           
                  /  | |  \     `"`                               
                  \__/ \__/            
[ ] If you were to ask me that question a couple of years ago, I would have shrugged my shoulders 

[ ] THE HEART OF % 
[ ] Scientists can now quickly link extreme weather events to 
[ ] "All for one!" "One for all!" "Every man for himself!" 
[ ] The Gaussian Curvature

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682342 — Re: Moroney's tests with Nomen tests versus Barry Shein tests with Eric Francis tests

> On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> > [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> > 
> > 13 points. 

Dan Christensen writes:

8:30 AM (4 hours ago)

>
Math failure Archie Pu scored 0/4 on this easy little math test (answers given here): 
>
Use any aids. Answer in the space provided. 
  
1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places?    (0.707 from calculator) 

2. True or false:  10^604 = 0   (False) 
  
3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is  (False) 
  
4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is  (True) 
0/4. What a numbskull! 
>Dan 


AP writes::  please let Medical doctors DNA test these stalkers --do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-25 year insane stalker, Michael Moroney compared to, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#682474 — Re: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
> >> Subject: Far too dumb of a human is Richard L. McElroy for he allows
> >> sci.physics to be polluted day in and day out, via his AIOE.org
> >> Several years now, sci.physics is plagued by these spammers hiding behind
> > McElroy's AIOE, and causing sci.physics to be a pollution landscape. I say
> >-- never allow any AIOE posts to enter sci.physics.
> >>
> >> Drs.M. Plesser,Kate Scholberg
> >> Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as Aioe
> >McElroy & Buck Futter//never realizing the Real Electron=3Dmuon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
> >>
> >> Buck Futter writes:
> >>
> >> 8:48 PM (30 minutes ago)
> >>
> >> >This is a physics group, not a chemistry group,
> >> >you walking catalog of third-world rectal disorders.
> >>
> 
> 
> >Michael Moroney wrote:
> 
> 
> >3:07 PM (2 hours ago)
> 
> 
> >> [Archimedes Plutonium] flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> 
> In this post:
> 
> [X] Archie responds to criticism but is unable to discuss the issue...
> [X] ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
> [ ] ...and to the wrong newsgroup...
> [X] ...multiple times...
> [X] ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
> [X] ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test never taken...
> [X] ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
> [X] ...who are university math or physics professors...
> [X] ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
> [X] ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
> [ ] ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
> [ ] ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
> [X] ...and Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
> [X] ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
> [X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
> [X] ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
> [ ] ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
> [ ] ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
> [ ] ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
> [ ] ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
> [ ] ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
> [ ] ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
> [ ] ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> 
> 13 points. Archie is losing it.

Dan Christensen 	writes:
12:07 AM (13 hours ago)

>There are no known paradoxes (i.e. inconsistencies) in modern set theory. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 
>
>Dan

AP writes::  please let Medical doctors DNA test these stalkers --do please submit to DNA testing as a proven-25 year insane stalker, Michael Moroney compared to, Jan Bielawski-24 year, Jan Burse-approx 5 year, Dan Christensen-approx 6 year, Karl Olav Nyberg approx 3 year, Alouatta approx 3 years, Zelos Malum--approx 2 yr, insane stalkers, probably have the same genetic defects that make them obsessive stalkers. Probably all of them have a defect on the Y chromosome.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#683905 — Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> [X] ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...


benj writes:



1:48 AM (10 hours ago)



Nobody is envious of a senile old insane geezer. We feel nothing but 
pity for you. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684347 — Re: Archimedes Plutonium flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 at 10:28:36 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> [ ] ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
> 



James McGinn wrote:

6:01 PM (1 hour ago)
>There is no such thing as a gas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685439

Michael Moroney 	writes:
3:10 PM (10 minutes ago)

>Still no answer? I knew you weren't very good at math but I thought you 
>could at least do simple problems like that.

percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945 


On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 


AP writes: these type of posts goes away once the 26 year long stalker Moroney is forced to go away-- otherwise, they are like the US postage stamp, the "forever stamp"


On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:26:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 
> 
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685941

Michael Moroney 	writes:
1:21 AM (10 hours ago)

> "Failure"

percentage for Moroney, 938 is what percent short of 945

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
> 
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

AP writes: I am sure Leon Lederman was able to do correct percentages even in Grade School, so why is Moron Moroney still posting in sci.physics



On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 7:26:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 13:35:31 -0800 (PST)
> 
> Subject: Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:35:31 +0000
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test 
> 
> Physics lifelong-generation Test & Leon Lederman flunked it 
> 
> Now in each generation of about 50 years, there is a big question in science which the general population participates in-- for example Continental Drift from about 1930 to 1970. And from 1980 to present the question is Climate Change. Big science questions where the general public participates in. 
> 
> Now there is a Science lifelong-generation Test. It has but one question, do you believe and accept Global Warming Climate Change, and has never vocalized any opposition to it? If yes, well, you pass, if no, well, you were never a scientist, never. 
> 
> Now, Physics has a lifelong-generation Test. Here again, only one question is needed. 
> 
> PHYSICS TEST:: 
> 
> 1) You studied momentum in physics, especially angular momentum, and, can you have Chemistry and the Chemical Bond, the ionic, covalent, metallic bonding, if the Proton was 938MeV while electron is .5MeV. Or, can this bonding exist only when the Proton is 840 MeV, electron = muon = 105 MeV, and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole. So, which is it. Chemistry exists only if 840 to 105 MeV for angular momentum sake or 938 to .5? 
> 
> So, all physicists who studied and thought they mastered physics, turns out, they are so pitiful, so pathetic in physics understanding of just about anything, that they believe you can have Chemistry with a 938 MeV proton with a .5 MeV electron. 
> 
> Leon Lederman flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test. 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web