Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #549715 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-01 09:45 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-02-04 20:02 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 28 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:45 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-02-02 00:54 -0500
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 06:07 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 09:26 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 13:25 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 19:35 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 14:21 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 20:54 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 15:04 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-02 23:16 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 18:59 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 01:05 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-02 19:17 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 02:49 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:17 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:35 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:04 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:34 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:49 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-02 17:25 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-03 16:18 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:32 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-04 17:26 -0800
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 19:35 -0600
Re: Repost: Inertial frame of reference Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 20:02 -0600
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-01 09:45 -0600 |
| Subject | Repost: Inertial frame of reference |
| Message-ID | <Eq6dnQ03LMUu4DLLnZ2dnUU7-L2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 00:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <a3h0bbpqnimtbb1ueutindnh2r1810kaan@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #549715 |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:45:55 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: Reposted ... why?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 06:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <olt5oc-as2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #549868 |
Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:45:55 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > > Reposted ... why? For some bizarre reason, the spamming ass hat gets a boner cut and pasting the same things over and over. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 09:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <U9GdnTVyfdwoVy3LnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #549873 |
On 2/2/16 12:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > For some bizarre reason, the spamming ass hat gets a boner cut and > pasting the same things over and over. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 19:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <t3b7oc-0n7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #549932 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 12:07 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> For some bizarre reason, the spamming ass hat gets a boner cut and >> pasting the same things over and over. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. <snip yet another boner producing repaste of the same thing> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 13:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vuWdnVkEios9nyzLnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #549994 |
On 2/2/16 1:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 19:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d1d7oc-bv7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #549997 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 1:02 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. <snip yet another repaste of the same thing> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 14:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <K5SdnefyYqwlkizLnZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550003 |
On 2/2/16 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 20:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <skh7oc-9d8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550008 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 1:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. >> >> If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. > > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, > your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. <snip yet another repaste of the cut and paste> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 15:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <K5SdneLyYqxEhCzLnZ2dnUU7-QUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550019 |
On 2/2/16 2:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 23:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ovp7oc-d99.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550021 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 2:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. >> >> If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. > > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. snip yet another repaste of the cut and paste. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 18:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <_tednUFgbZpzzSzLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550059 |
On 2/2/16 5:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 01:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8c08oc-bt9.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550084 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 5:16 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. >> >> If you don't like my language, tough shit, shit head. > > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, > your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, tough shit. snip yet another repaste. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-02 19:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <_tednX1gbZqEyCzLnZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550093 |
On 2/2/16 7:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1f68oc-2ga.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550094 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 7:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, > your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. If you don't like my language, that is tough shit, ass hole. Snip yet another idiotic repaste. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 07:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <LI-dnWAIyPxMYCzLnZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550107 |
On 2/2/16 8:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kf0aoc-v2h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550192 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/2/16 8:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Fuck off and die, copyright violating, cut and paste, spamming shit head. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Shove it up your ass, fuck head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 13:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <NImdnd9-74ceyy_LnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550277 |
On 2/3/16 1:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Shove it up your ass, fuck head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jh2aoc-b9h.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #550280 |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/3/16 1:19 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Shove it up your ass, fuck head. > > > > Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, Fuck off and die, shit head. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-03 14:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <NImdndV-74fHwC_LnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #550292 |
On 2/3/16 1:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Fuck off and die, shit head. Now, now, jimp, your *obsessive-compulsive* behavior is outta control, your *language inappropriate* and your absolute contempt and total disgust are addressed in these Anger Management classes. You, jimp, need these services: > http://yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Inertial frame of reference > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference > In physics, an inertial frame of reference (also inertial reference > frame or inertial frame or Galilean reference frame or inertial > space) is a frame of reference that describes time and space > homogeneously, isotropically, and in a time-independent manner.[1] > > All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion > with respect to one another; an accelerometer moving with any of them > would detect zero acceleration. Measurements in one inertial frame > can be converted to measurements in another by a simple > transformation (the Galilean transformation in Newtonian physics and > the Lorentz transformation in special relativity). In general > relativity, in any region small enough for the curvature of spacetime > to be negligible, one can find a set of inertial frames that > approximately describe that region.[2][3] > > Physical laws take the same form in all inertial frames.[4] By > contrast, in a non-inertial reference frame the laws of physics vary > depending on the acceleration of that frame with respect to an > inertial frame, and the usual physical forces must be supplemented by > fictitious forces.[5][6] For example, a ball dropped towards the > ground does not go exactly straight down because the Earth is > rotating. Someone rotating with the Earth must account for the > Coriolis effect—in this case thought of as a force—to predict the > horizontal motion. Another example of such a fictitious force > associated with rotating reference frames is the centrifugal effect, > or centrifugal force. An accelerometer would detect zero acceleration. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web